Started By
Message
re: Lane is about make OM pay
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:27 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:27 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
Congrats on making MBG.
1
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:32 pm to geauxcoco
They evidently signed a contract. This case may open the flood gates. Couldn't happened to two bigger assholes, LSU and Kiffen.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:37 pm to geauxcoco
quote:
didn’t want to go play there.
You're being disengenuos. They were fine going to Ole Miss until LSU raised the ante.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:54 pm to Quicksilver
Don't understand any of your trans lingo. Evidently you never even worked for someone with deep pockets. Verbal stuff can get you on the hook for money in the form of "implied contract".
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:57 pm to geauxcoco
quote:
Lane is about make OM pay
LSU fans are making complete fools of themselves.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:57 pm to ukraine_rebel
quote:
I think the play here isn’t to make Ole Miss look bad but rather to get rid of buyouts. After this, what player is going to sign a rev share w a buyout in it? Agents will spin this and have them done away with next recruiting cycle.
Agreed. This case is both schools testing the revenue share buyout/contract viability.
This is the first real case of a school going after kids for revenue share issues, we'll see what happens.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 3:58 pm to Sharlo
quote:
OM looks like Ned in the Third Grade and will probably lose some recruits over this, as all LSU or anyone else has to say is: "If you go there and leave, OM will sue you."
Why hasn’t Ole Miss sued any of the other players who hit the portal and left this offseason? Only the two players who signed agreements and left?
Oh yeah, because LSU fans are super emotional about this for some reason
Posted on 7/29/26 at 6:26 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
quote:
Don't understand any of your trans lingo. Evidently you never even worked for someone with deep pockets. Verbal stuff can get you on the hook for money in the form of "implied contract".
Players would have to file separate suit or bring LSU in as a third party.
They had legal representation throughout the entire process, I can’t imagine verbal agreements as such not being reduced in writing. Maybe they can file malpractice suits against their attorneys.
This may end up being a bad look for LSU, but the school will not be held responsible for the players’ breach of contract.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 6:32 pm to geauxcoco
LSU fans are struggling.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 6:37 pm to geauxcoco
Players have agents, correct?
Posted on 7/29/26 at 6:49 pm to Goldingera
quote:
Goldingera
Nice Alter name. Born on 12/22/25. I bet you were shedding some awesome tears when you made this account.
quote:
The actual recruiting line for portal players is “LSU is gonna leave you high and dry on that buyout while *every other school in the country* will pay it” lmao I’d imagine those players aren’t too happy being served a complaint asking for their salary because their school is acting poor
LSU is going to pay the money, the boys know it, and are in on the game. Kiffin will stretch this out, and use this to any advantage he can think of. There is plenty to gain from this.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:07 pm to geauxcoco
quote:You are one crazy fool
Do you see the problem with that?
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:08 pm to geauxcoco
quote:Nobody thinks this but LSU fans
just love how fricking stupid this makes Ole Miss look
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:12 pm to Goldingera
quote:
Nice fan fiction
More true than the 1000s of tales the Crying Rebs come up with.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:46 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
quote:
Don't understand any of your trans lingo. Evidently you never even worked for someone with deep pockets. Verbal stuff can get you on the hook for money in the form of "implied contract".
Players would have to file separate suit or bring LSU in as a third party.
They had legal representation throughout the entire process, I can’t imagine verbal agreements as such not being reduced in writing. Maybe they can file malpractice suits against their attorneys.
This may end up being a bad look for LSU, but the school will not be held responsible for the players’ breach of contract.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:09 pm to RebelExpress38
quote:dude im an LSU, and the amount of crying ive heard about this is wild. Like what are we so worked up for? My goodness
because LSU fans are super emotional about this for some reason
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:12 pm to geauxcoco
quote:Coco this whole thread and all of your responses honestly makes you seem the one obsessed with Ole Miss. Some yall take this shite too serious...
When is Ole Miss
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:20 pm to geauxcoco
quote:Truthfully listen to both your schools bicker about nothing all the time really makes both look bad … no one gives two shits about Ole Miss and LSU it’s irrelevant. So please stop posting about Ole miss and starting new threads daily about them it’s embarrassing.
could give two shits if we pay it, I just love how fricking stupid this makes Ole Miss look and how badly Lane will use this against them. Anyone out there who thinks otherwise it’s just heads in the sand.
This post was edited on 7/29/26 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:36 pm to geauxcoco
I feel the only real negative for OM here is the negative recruiting every other team will use with this.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:47 pm to cyarrr
quote:
Players would have to file separate suit or bring LSU in as a third party.
Players could absolutely sue LSU over an implied contract. If so terrible publicity for LSU.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News