Started By
Message
re: Lane is about make OM pay
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:03 pm to SidewalkTiger
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:03 pm to SidewalkTiger
I know you have autism and take everything literally but it’s called trolling you dumb frick. It’s so easy to get a rise out of you rubes.
1
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:04 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
I know you have autism and take everything literally but it’s called trolling you dumb frick. It’s so easy to get a rise out of you rubes.
That's cool. Like Landmass said, we're loving it.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:06 pm to SidewalkTiger
Tell us more about how the contract Princewill signed “isn’t legal” you dumb frick. Stand behind your argument you weak bitch.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:10 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Tell us more about how the contract Princewill signed “isn’t legal” you dumb frick. Stand behind your argument you weak bitch.
I didn't say it wasn't legal, I said it may not be legal. Everything could be perfectly enforceable and the players will pay the buyouts.
Again, both schools are testing the enforceability of revenue share contracts, this is going to set the precedent for how these are handled going forward.
I have no prediction as to how it will work out.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:10 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Stand behind your argument you weak bitch.
Seems like a nerve was hit.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:12 pm to geauxcoco
quote:
from those players for nothing but signing their names
With a legally binding contract that's pretty much all it takes.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:17 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
I said it may not be legal.
Because you’re stupid.
quote:
both schools are testing the enforceability of revenue share contracts
Again you are stupid. It’s a contract dispute. You’re calling it a “revenue share contract” because you’re stupid.
The contract meets all of the elements of a legally enforceable contract. Contract disputes have been going to court since the 14th century. Ole Miss isn’t “testing” anything retard.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:25 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Again you are stupid. It’s a contract dispute. You’re calling it a “revenue share contract” because you’re stupid.
It's a contract dispute over a revenue share agreement...
quote:
The contract meets all of the elements of a legally enforceable contract. Contract disputes have been going to court since the 14th century. Ole Miss isn’t “testing” anything retard.
Okay, since you believe I'm "stupid" what is your opinion on why the players didn't pay the buyouts?
Do you think Kiffin and Billy Glasscock forgot how the portal works? Do you think LSU doesn't have lawyers? If it's as open and shut as you claim, why the hold up?
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:27 pm to SidewalkTiger
It's funny that this thread is still going. There will be a courtroom full of people that are paid big bucks to hash this out. How about we just see what the court says?
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:34 pm to Landmass
quote:
It's funny that this thread is still going. There will be a courtroom full of people that are paid big bucks to hash this out. How about we just see what the court says?
I think we all know what the result will be, at least at the trial court level.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:38 pm to Landmass
quote:
It's funny that this thread is still going. There will be a courtroom full of people that are paid big bucks to hash this out. How about we just see what the court says?
It's just the nature of message boards. I personally enjoy debate.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News