Favorite team:Ole Miss 
Location:In your base, killin your dudes
Biography:
Interests:https://i.imgur.com/pmTDaRT.jpg
Occupation:
Number of Posts:14337
Registered on:4/16/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Sanky was talking generally about tampering. You linked a specific article about a legal case where the difference between NIL and Revenue Share is literally the reason why there is even a case to begin with, yet the writer doesn’t know or care enough to make the distinction.

Just admit you don’t know either or you just liked the bias and posted it to fit your narrative.
The difference between NIL and Rev Share is a massive part of this case. Yet you post someone who doesn’t know the difference.
Shows you how little casual LSU fans know about current state of this sport when they regurgitate national writers calling this an NIL dispute when it’s actually Revenue Share. That’s an important distinction if you actually follow the sport and recruiting.

This has been in the news for weeks and we have people who still don’t understand the difference. I recommend reading up on it and then posting.
quote:

many states disfavor non-compete clauses in employment contracts



Many suspect this would be viewed as liquidated damages instead of a traditional non compete. I think that favors Ole Miss especially if there is a strong paper trail on how the buyout numbers were calculated and agreed upon prior to the contracts being signed.
Will Lane’s second choice QB pan out 2 years in a row? Who knows. Going to be tough with all new players in an all new system.
quote:

LSU never agreed to pay it, so again it just looks bad for Old Piss.



If LSU recruited these guys and told them to not worry about the buyout, and have no interest or intention of paying, that will come back to bite hard. Any kid who has a deal in place will be told the cautionary tale of the 2 guys who went there and had to pay buyouts out of their own pockets.

Hope the head in the sand ignore the lawyers strategy works for LSU!

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by RebelExpress38 on 7/30/26 at 9:51 am to
quote:

So Mensah paid via his NIL earnings?



Yes. Miami paid him more money to help him pay the buyout.

If you do mental gymnastics hard enough you can rationalize that this doesn’t count as Miami paying the buyout. However you need to spin it.
Miami upped their deal to Mensah so he could cover the buyout settlement. Money is fungible and everyone knows this, but everyone is being intentionally obtuse about this claiming “Miami isn’t directly involved” because the check didn’t come directly from Miami.

So yall believe a player transferred knowing he’s very likely going to be in the hook for a big buyout, and didn’t negotiate an increased NIL payout to make up for the settlement? Just paid out of his own pocket because he was sold on Miami’s academics or something?

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by RebelExpress38 on 7/30/26 at 9:02 am to
quote:

I’ll hang up and listen.


Darian Mensah. Hope this helps

LINK


quote:

The case settled quickly, reportedly involving Mensah paying a significant buyout to Duke—likely in the range of millions of dollars—to exit the remaining term of his contract.

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by RebelExpress38 on 7/30/26 at 8:13 am to
Or they would just transfer to a school that pays buyouts for their players.

This isn’t hard.
quote:

Debt slavery has been illegal in the United States in some form, since its founding. The passage of the 13th Amendment codified it into the Constitution. It is indeed cut and dry. Just maybe not as cut and dry in the direction you want it.



:lol:

“I don’t like the employment terms I agreed to, and that’s actually slavery. I’m smart”
quote:

You little cuck boys need to calm down before you kill any chance of other players coming to your school.



LSU will look great to future recruits when they are on the record refusing to pay rev share agreement buy outs for their players. Im sure these players love all the extra attention they are getting in the news completely unrelated to their actual football ability. Not distracting at all!

quote:

LSU is going to pay the money, the boys know it, and are in on the game. Kiffin will stretch this out, and use this to any advantage he can think of. There is plenty to gain from this.



I’m sure every future recruit who has a revenue share agreement signed at former school will love to go to LSU when they know the buyout will drag out “for LSU’s advantage”

LSU has more to lose than OM dragging this out. All other schools have to say is “if you go to lsu, they’ll refuse to pay your buyout and you’ll be dealing with lawyers all year”

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by RebelExpress38 on 7/29/26 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

OM looks like Ned in the Third Grade and will probably lose some recruits over this, as all LSU or anyone else has to say is: "If you go there and leave, OM will sue you."


Why hasn’t Ole Miss sued any of the other players who hit the portal and left this offseason? Only the two players who signed agreements and left?

Oh yeah, because LSU fans are super emotional about this for some reason
quote:

State won the SEC Western Divison in 1998


A super impressive 8-5 record to pair with it
Those crazy evangelicals might’ve been onto something saying it was a slippery slope
LSU’s biggest weakness this year will be blonde coeds