
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/25/26 at 6:25 pm to OleVaught14
My only regret is I had a couple more great thread ideas to get though the last week of the offseason that will go to waste now 
Posted on 8/25/26 at 6:28 pm to Dixie.Reb
Don't think LSU will be fighting this.
quote:
The vote from SEC presidents on the new pro-player ban was unanimous, as well as granting Greg Sankey unlimited powers to enforce the rule.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:06 pm to OleVaught14
They're salty and it's funny. They've been insufferable, motherless fricks about this since the weekend. Oh well.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 9:37 pm to A10Rebel
If it can be proven and players go on record that LSU and Kiffin were trying to get players to sue the NCAA for eligibility, his arse very well could be showcaused.
It’s a long shot but my God that would be beyond epic
It’s a long shot but my God that would be beyond epic
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:06 pm to Henry Jones Jr
The problem is that a show cause probably gets LSU off the hook for $72 mil so I’d rather he gets to stick around and just keep causing messes like this 
Posted on 8/25/26 at 10:18 pm to Dixie.Reb
How hilarious would it be if zxavian Harris ends up being the witness the ncaa uses to prove kiffin orchestrated this whole thing.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 11:23 pm to Henry Jones Jr
The guy is shite from a butt. But he'll always be that no matter where he hangs his hat. You just want people to come around to seeing the absolute narcissist that he is. A casual glance at social media would indicate a lot of college football fans see that. Him and LSU fans are made for each other, however and as evil seems to prevail in the world these days I remain pessimistic about the gavel of humility being dropped on LSU.
I don't know who would pursue this anyway? I don't believe the NCAA has any teeth.
I don't know who would pursue this anyway? I don't believe the NCAA has any teeth.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:41 am to A10Rebel
I understand the animosity for Lane, but his comments on the five for five rule seem perfectly fair? Harris and Wright should have been told they were going to have another year of eligibility in a timely manner. They’d have absolutely stayed at Ole Miss or moved on to make a nice NIL bag.
I’m not outraged the two are probably going to be ineligible, but I wish everyone would have an honest conversation and we tell the thousands of entirely too old “college athletes” to move on so high schoolers can be prioritized again. The ladder has been pulled up on people in so many professions and we’ve managed to add college athletics to the list
I’m not outraged the two are probably going to be ineligible, but I wish everyone would have an honest conversation and we tell the thousands of entirely too old “college athletes” to move on so high schoolers can be prioritized again. The ladder has been pulled up on people in so many professions and we’ve managed to add college athletics to the list
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:49 am to tigerbait2010
The rules are retarded for everyone but Lane's own actions have people dunking on him. Lane has never wanted his behavior to be criticized even here(easiest example is not playing Bentley in 24).
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:04 am to tigerbait2010
quote:
I understand the animosity for Lane, but his comments on the five for five rule seem perfectly fair? Harris and Wright should have been told they were going to have another year of eligibility in a timely manner. They’d have absolutely stayed at Ole Miss or moved on to make a nice NIL bag.
I’m not outraged the two are probably going to be ineligible, but I wish everyone would have an honest conversation and we tell the thousands of entirely too old “college athletes” to move on so high schoolers can be prioritized again. The ladder has been pulled up on people in so many professions and we’ve managed to add college athletics to the list
I do see how the class of 2022 got screwed. But it's also hard to feel too bad for them when they are first class to have NIL available to them their entire collegiate career and through their senior year of hs recruiting. I don't like the 5 for 5 to begin with, not sure why it's always been you have 4 years with redshirt and medical exemptions, but now everyone has 5 years.
As for Wright and Harris, I do think they would have declared this year even if they had the ability to go back. Wright was All-SEC and was thought to be an NFL draft pick. Didn't work out that way, but both him and Harris were thought to be draft picks at the end of last season so I think they would have declared anyways. There are tons of others I think 100% would have stayed in school had they been given the option so I still see the argument that the timeline screwed them.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:18 am to tigerbait2010
You have to draw the line somewhere, and someone was going to be screwed either way.
They could have made 2022 eligible for a 5th year, but coaches had been recruiting like they were gone so incoming kids would have been told, long after they had signed and committed, that they no longer had a spot because a super senior was returning.
What makes the 2022 class more important than this freshman class? Why should the freshman had been told, late in the process, they no longer had a roster spot because a newly eligible 2022 was returning?
They could have made 2022 eligible for a 5th year, but coaches had been recruiting like they were gone so incoming kids would have been told, long after they had signed and committed, that they no longer had a spot because a super senior was returning.
What makes the 2022 class more important than this freshman class? Why should the freshman had been told, late in the process, they no longer had a roster spot because a newly eligible 2022 was returning?
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 11:29 am
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:20 am to DMagic
The only statement I’ve seen him come out seemed within reason. It’s fair to say wright and harris should have been notified they can play a fifth year, because the ruling leaves a lot of money in the table for both of them.
Lane’s handling of Bentley is way more bewildering to me
Lane’s handling of Bentley is way more bewildering to me
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:38 am to tigerbait2010
His general behavior is what I meant. I have no issue with Wright or Harris coming back at all and have said they should be able to play wherever. The NCAA is who I truly hate and wish nothing but ill will upon.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:16 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
but I wish everyone would have an honest conversation and we tell the thousands of entirely too old “college athletes” to move on so high schoolers can be prioritized again
I 100% support this. And maybe I'm just old but I just hate the complete lack of loyalty to schools in exchange for loyalty to mammon. I don't have any issue providing NIL income, whatever that figure is for the individual, but I simply won't endorse having to re-recruit players at the conclusion of each season. They don't even do this in the pros. You sign a contract, you want out in a year, fine but you're going to get a reduced bag. I'd much rather watch the development of high schoolers and cheer their progression through one program. What's wrong with that? I don't know who the frick is on our team from one year to the next with the exception of the absolute stand outs. It used to be fun to anticipate the buildup to signing day and score your "guy." Now...why bother. I hate that. The loopholes and bypasses, and work arounds, wild west absolutely sucks. I'm by no means saying we're not guilty either because we certainly took our liberties and used the NCAA's own language to make it happen with TC but it we want it all back all this has to go in the fire. All of it.
And for the record I'm not trying to generalize all LSU fans, there are some of you here that I enjoy your takes and appreciate your honesty and humbleness. I'm glad you can comment on our board.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 7:31 am to A10Rebel
They need multi year contracts.
Rookie/Freshman contract for 2 years
Then the 2nd Contract to reward guys who are lower level who want to move up or guys who have broken out and have more bargaining power.
Yearly free agency is absurd.
Rookie/Freshman contract for 2 years
Then the 2nd Contract to reward guys who are lower level who want to move up or guys who have broken out and have more bargaining power.
Yearly free agency is absurd.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:24 pm to tigerbait2010
They went to the NFL. They took money from a team, practiced, and played.
You can no longer come back to college.
You can no longer come back to college.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 2:01 pm to Shunface
They would have returned just like every other class of 2022 athlete had the NCAA ruled in a timely manner. They’ve never competed in the NFL. Do people think Harris practicing with the saints for a summer without being paid constitutes being ineligible?
Every class of 2022 athlete should be eligible to compete per the rules, and after that under no circumstances should “professional athletes” be allowed to return to college.
By the way, Ole Miss isn’t very serious in this pearl clutching. You made your should be NFL quarterback eligible through a kangaroo court just like LSU went the injunction route. If fair is fair all three athletes discussed should be ineligible but if Ole Miss gets to bend the rules then LSU certainly should.
I completely agree. None of the former and current Ole Miss athletes discussed should be playing college football this year.
Every class of 2022 athlete should be eligible to compete per the rules, and after that under no circumstances should “professional athletes” be allowed to return to college.
By the way, Ole Miss isn’t very serious in this pearl clutching. You made your should be NFL quarterback eligible through a kangaroo court just like LSU went the injunction route. If fair is fair all three athletes discussed should be ineligible but if Ole Miss gets to bend the rules then LSU certainly should.
I completely agree. None of the former and current Ole Miss athletes discussed should be playing college football this year.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 3:28 pm to tigerbait2010
Arguments over whether or not they should be able to play aside, I just don’t understand why LSU is going through all this for what is essentially going to be two depth pieces with the players they already have on campus.
We at least did it to bring back arguably the top QB in college football.
We at least did it to bring back arguably the top QB in college football.
Latest Ole Miss News

Popular
Back to top


1








