Started By
Message
The B1G and SEC want UNC, so who wins the prize?
Posted on 6/28/26 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 6/28/26 at 6:48 pm
It is the Gem of the ACC. An academic and athletic powerhouse.
Also, N.C. State left out or not?
Also, N.C. State left out or not?
Posted on 6/28/26 at 6:53 pm to BuckI
By all accounts the UNC athletic department and money people want the SEC. So id guess that
This post was edited on 6/28/26 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 6/28/26 at 6:56 pm to Cuthy
quote:What is your reason?
I would hope not!
Posted on 6/28/26 at 6:58 pm to BuckI
I would be fine with bringing UNC and Clemson to the SEC
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:07 pm to BuckI
I don’t care for some schedules being much harder than other teams. The more teams added would likely exacerbate that.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:08 pm to VFL67
I know Clemson is bigger nationwide, but USC rules the state. Are they really valuable to the SEC?
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:11 pm to BuckI
quote:Clemson is a lock to go to Big 10.
I know Clemson is bigger nationwide, but USC rules the state. Are they really valuable to the SEC?
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:20 pm to TrueLefty
They operate more like an SEC school
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:26 pm to TrueLefty
It would make sense for them and probably what they prefer.
Florida State should be more desirable than they are. Some speculate their suing the ACC made them suspect but I doubt the state will stay at 1 member of a P2 league.
Florida State should be more desirable than they are. Some speculate their suing the ACC made them suspect but I doubt the state will stay at 1 member of a P2 league.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:30 pm to BuckI
Lol gem of the acc athletic lmao really now fau and clemson are gyms wtf has unc done
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:32 pm to BuckI
Usc don't own shite dumbass go look at the record how many natties does usc have who owns who look at the over all record
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:44 pm to Tenn grad LSU fan
Are you serious about UNC? It is the top brand in the ACC.
quote:Perhaps I'm wrong but I believe they have more fans than Clemson in their state.
Usc don't own shite dumbass go look at the record how many natties does usc have who owns who look at the over all record
Posted on 6/28/26 at 7:44 pm to VFL67
UNC and UVa
Nobody else should be considered at all.
Nobody else should be considered at all.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:03 pm to NickPapageorgio
UVA is the actual boss of that conference somehow
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:05 pm to NickPapageorgio
How about California to the SEC? 
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:08 pm to BuckI
UNC is not a football power. For whatever reason, being a mainly basketball power isn't nearly as valuable. That's why, for example, the Big 10 hasn't gone after Kansas. I feel Kansas is a natural Big 10 expansion target but there has been no sign of that happening.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:13 pm to BuckI
Of course anecdotal, but as a UNC alum (JD), I don’t know anyone who wants to join a largely Midwestern conference. Outside of NC, UNC alumni largely work in SEC states, work with SEC alumni, and find far more scholastic and cultural camaraderie with SEC grads.
Most of them would prefer that the ACC remain intact, but would choose the SEC over any other conference.
UNC and UVA should be in the same conference as their geographic (e.g., Tennessee, South Carolina), academic (e.g., Vandy, UF, UGA, Texas), and cultural peers. I don’t think they want to be in a random conference with Rutgers, Ohio State, and Oregon.
Most of them would prefer that the ACC remain intact, but would choose the SEC over any other conference.
UNC and UVA should be in the same conference as their geographic (e.g., Tennessee, South Carolina), academic (e.g., Vandy, UF, UGA, Texas), and cultural peers. I don’t think they want to be in a random conference with Rutgers, Ohio State, and Oregon.
Back to top

8




