Favorite team:Auburn 
Location:Colleyville Tx
Biography:
Interests:Gardening, Trucks
Occupation:Retired- Now on 2nd career GOLF
Number of Posts:64
Registered on:8/24/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Messi or Ice Cube?? Which is biggest "world" star?
The point about “center of the conference schools” doesn’t mean much…football championship game being in Atlanta. Why not hold it at Globe Life and eliminate the rain and lightning issues?
I have had several occasions to spend a bit of time with this man…he is absolutely one of the nicest, easiest to talk with stars around. In fact, first time was at a gathering where my company had an appearance by Julius Erving - another tremendously gracious superstar- as the keynote speaker the following evening. My boss and I shared a table of 4 with Earl and Doc for dinner that night. Some great conversations and stories!
Anyone have the current student populations/enrollments? I guess inclusive of grad schools numbers.

re: Tuesday SEC Baseball

Posted by Cuthy on 4/28/26 at 11:44 am to
The remaining schedule for Ga. is much easier than the ones for other schools I’ve seen. Aggies, Auburn, Oklahoma, Miss. St. are very challenging.

That’s what you get though when playing baseball in this conference. I believe that the most competitive sport in the SEC is baseball. What other sport does Ole Miss, Miss. St., Vandy, S. Carolina win National titles? You add those schools into the TOP level with the others…man, almost everyone can field nationally ranked teams.
With Beshear exploring a run for Dem presidential nomination I would say his comment about concerns about “partisan” influence may be revealing his motives in posting this.
No one has suggested a D on behalf of Auburn so, here’s one (4-3-4)
Performance as collegians more heavily weighed in the selections

DL: Tracy Rocker (Outland winner)
Nick Fairley. (Outland winner)
Aundray Bruce (NFL #1 pick)
Quentin Groves
LB: Mike Kolen
Karlos Dansby
Freddie Smith
DB: Carlos Rogers
Larry Willingham
Carlton Davis
Tucker Frederickson

Got some older generation players in here that youngsters looking this over won’t know.
Coach Bryant would say in referring to Jordan - “Shig has more courage in his little finger than I have in my whole body”

They seemed to have a tremendous respect for the other and some degree of friendship.

re: 2023 Recruiting

Posted by Cuthy on 7/27/22 at 2:17 pm to
Was just 3-4 years ago there were so many mentions of Auburn losing out on recruits because we didn't have a new Football-only facility like our main competition for top recruits did. "If only" the administration would commit to and build a football Taj Mahal like those other schools, then we would win our share of the top recruits. I guess maybe $90+ million isn't enough to build a top-level facility or, the recruits don't know it will open before the end of the year.

SEC Media Days - TOP story will be _____?

Posted by Cuthy on 7/17/22 at 7:32 am
What will be the biggest story of this week's Media Days? Saban vs Fisher? Realignment "news"? Something out of left field?

What you got?

re: Is Sankey up to the task

Posted by Cuthy on 7/4/22 at 9:10 am to
Part of the issue with Missouri in the SEC is the lack of natural/traditional rivals. Adding a team or two that would complement each other in this way would strengthen the overall appeal of Missouri +, +.

Believe adding Texas and Oklahoma is going to be very good for Arkansas. Think of the old SWC and how many big games between Texas & Arkansas. And, though Oklahoma was Big 8, the schools aren't that distant from one another and that should develop into a strong rivalry.
So...adding Clemson and FSU would bring 50% more average viewers than what the B1G brought in with USC and UCLA. (per the 2015-2019 list)
With the forums of a month ago being centered on SEC football scheduling - how many "permanent" vs rotating opponents, divisions vs pods, etc - does further expansion really add any appeal to a future SEC football season? Or, just a big group of teams that rarely even play one another? Does a "conference" lose it's appeal when your team plays a handful of "conference" opponents once every 4-6 years? I doubt that the season would be extended by more than 1 week - and, maybe that's via some end of season conference playoff - so, there's not much opportunity to increase the frequency of teams meeting in that.

Why add some of the teams being talked about? Adding them is going to diminish the competition level.

re: B10 Retaliation?

Posted by Cuthy on 7/2/22 at 4:45 pm to
Reminds me of TCU experience when they were playing very good football but in the Mountain West conference. This was post merging of the Big 8 and SWC and only 4 Texas teams were to be part of the new Big 12. (Texas politicians drove the decisions and chose Baylor over TCU to be part of the new conference- along with Texas, A&M and Texas Tech). Though T C U was doing well the fact of playing games in Pacific time zone was a major detriment to viewership. Now, with a 4-time zone assortment of schools in a coast-to-coast B1G do not underestimate the problems this will create for TV.
I have no clue as to what led you to such a statement. So what that half the games are not so interesting- I’m guessing we could include Vandy vs anybody, Missouri, Kentucky, too. But, reading back thru the games that would Not occur every year - Ok vs Texas, Ga vs Aub, Ala vs Tenn, LSU vs Ole Miss to name a few - slot those in on that additional week of SEC National broadcasts. Very valuable programming! The SEC commissioner and school Presidents are not going to just add that to the TV rights (had they announced at Destin last week) without getting something ($$$$) in return.
This is about negotiating with Disney/ESPN to get the contract money increased for providing one more week of strong SEC matchups. The same rivalry games you all mention as going away in a 1/7 format are very valuable potential TV audiences. When both sides of the table agree to raising the annual contract monies, we will see an announcement of a 3/6 schedule.

re: Kentucky lost their Super Bowl

Posted by Cuthy on 1/23/22 at 8:07 am to
The result was what was expected. Saw a compilation of media picks across multiple outlets (CBS, 247, ESPN, etc) ahead of the game. NO one picked Kentucky! Came out exactly as expected.