Started By
Message
re: The B1G and SEC want UNC, so who wins the prize?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:42 am to Gunny Hartman
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:42 am to Gunny Hartman
But you don’t think the SEC should boost up in anything other than fb?
0
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:46 am to Scoob
quote:
This is if they are going to 2 conferences. In that case, I can't see Texas being the limit we go west.
Geographically, where would you stop?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:48 am to Cuthy
While I agree, little hard to do when 1 TZ falls on the Ga./Alabama borderline.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:14 am to Landmass
Sankey has made it about as clear as he could without tampering that he wants UNC and uva. I can understand UNC but not so much uva. There is obviously reasons beyond having a competitive FB team.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:24 am to southernboisb
quote:It was a great coup by the B1G, even Sankey would have jumped at the chance to add Los Angeles.
Yet Los Angeles, Oregon, & Washington (state) does in the B1G?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:49 am to Dry Prong Wildcat
The only things that UVa brings in is the D.C. TV market and the leftwing politics.
No thanks.
No thanks.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:54 am to Landmass
quote:
The only things that UVa brings in is the D.C. TV market and the leftwing politics.
UVA doesn’t bring the DC market, they’re probably like 4th after Maryland, Va Tech and Penn State.
Culturally and from a sports standpoint Va Tech would be a far better addition IMO.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 8:06 am to southernboisb
quote:
Yet Los Angeles, Oregon, & Washington (state) does in the B1G?
The real question is whether adding west coast schools would make the conference money or add to the conference in football or basketball.
I don’t see how Arizona or ASU would do either which is why the B10 didn’t bring them when they made their western expansion.
Clear value adds:
UNC
Borderline:
FSU
Clemson
Miami
Va Tech
NC State
UVA
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News