Started By
Message
re: Is south carolina a sleeping cfp threat this year?
Posted on 8/1/26 at 2:47 pm to JamalMurry27
Posted on 8/1/26 at 2:47 pm to JamalMurry27
No
Posted on 8/1/26 at 2:59 pm to JamalMurry27
Old team experienced mobile qb with a deep ball, wr with elite speed that can get downfield, should have solid dline. Serious depth questions(who doesnt these days) on the roster and a lotta questions on online(really poor last year). If the oline figures it out they’ll push for a playoff spot. If the oline is bad….the deep ball becomes obsolete, defenses stack the box and they probably struggle to make a bowl.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 3:02 pm to JamalMurry27
South Carolina is a joke, and every year we go through this nonsense for some inexplicable reason with their program.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 3:19 pm to JamalMurry27
quote:
with lanoris sellers back again im a little suprised there isnt a little more hype for them.
Sellers actually reminds me of Vince Young...A Vince Young with little to no talent around him.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:19 pm to JamalMurry27
The schedule is very favorable to them. They somehow drew Arkansas, Kentucky, Florida, and MSU, all of which they should be favored against. They get a talented but rebuilding Alabama early, and Tennessee will be rebuilding on offense. Clemson seems to be going down the wrong path. GA, OU, and A&M are probably losses but there's a path to 10-2 or 9-3 if the stars align. They've had A&M's number the last two years. I'm not really a Sellers NFL believer but I think Kendal Briles could get production out of most QBs.
So sure, there's an unlikely path to 10-2 which would likely earn a playoff berth. 8-4/7-5 is probably where I would put them. If they lose to MSU in September, the wheels will probably fall off and Beamer is probably done.
So sure, there's an unlikely path to 10-2 which would likely earn a playoff berth. 8-4/7-5 is probably where I would put them. If they lose to MSU in September, the wheels will probably fall off and Beamer is probably done.
This post was edited on 8/1/26 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:26 pm to JamalMurry27
Absolutely. Better chance than Florida or some of these other teams that are mentioned.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 4:41 pm to JamalMurry27
Sellers is good for 4-5 complete no show performances a year. He can also win a game on his own.
Hes the most high ceiling low floor SEC QB in recent memory.
Hes the most high ceiling low floor SEC QB in recent memory.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 6:26 pm to FAT SEXY
quote:
Sellers got figured out last year
Sellers got put into a system that he was not suited for and the rest of the team did not have the talent to execute.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 6:38 pm to Victor R Franko
quote:
One O-lineman starter returning to team. O-line will have 0 offensive starts as a unit together and Ourlads web site has transfers for SC 5 O-line starters. I can understand the lack of hype.
This is probably a good thing. They had the worst OL in the conference last year. Made LSU’s look not terrible
Posted on 8/1/26 at 6:49 pm to JamalMurry27
I watched USCe last year against A&M so I will say no.
Shane lost me forever
Shane lost me forever
Posted on 8/1/26 at 8:29 pm to BurgTiger
Reggie McNeal II electric boogaloo
Posted on 8/1/26 at 8:35 pm to GarnetNBlack
Biggest problem for South Carolina is depth. They need to stay healthy for sure and try and close out games in the 4th qtr. DL is legit.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 8:39 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I like Briles, and think that should help Sellers a lot.
but South Carolina always seems able to frick things up.
I would say the same for Lame Kiffin.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 8:42 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
I would say the same for Lame Kiffin.
Lame Kiffin has more championship rings than SCar.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 10:12 pm to GarnetNBlack
quote:
terrible OL last year
This is, somehow, an understatement.
Posted on 8/1/26 at 10:14 pm to GarnetNBlack
Not sure Briles is all that great, he has bounced around quite a bit
Back to top

0








