Started By
Message

re: Big 12 might boycott Texas Tech

Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:17 am to
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
53530 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:17 am to
Do not let Tech fans claim they are doing no wrong. They are poison. They bring lies and deceit and dirty money to swindle their way into builiding a conference contender by allowing an overpaid mediocre QB to keep some eligibility before they ultimately lose in round one..

In reality they were the loser in middle school that got pantsed and stuffed into lockers by their big and bad bullies and now they just want revenge.
Posted by Dawgs2122
Member since Dec 2024
2721 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:21 am to
Couldn't the NCAA simply say "OK, he's free to play, but any game he plays in will be a forefit by Tech? Then we could see if Texas Tech is really all about "the young man;'s recovery" as they say.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
32656 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Reports are that he only bet on Indiana games when he was redshirted there. Never bet on a game he played in. He bet on lots of other stuff but not his games. We will see if this is true. Again, lots of postings with no facts.


Its a crime to do what you just said he did. He had insider information. And TT still coddled him and are really going to suffer from this long term. Even if you cut ties today the damage is done. Your school supported a known gambler which is the cardinal sin of sports.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



Posted by LOTOTiger
Member since May 2025
274 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:19 am to
Let's not forget Texas and OU flirting with Larry Scott and the Pac10 (and attempting to bring/force A&M and OSU along for the ride). That was very, very close to reality - and ultimately what set the first wave of big12 defections (Colorado, Nebraska, A&M, Mizzou) in motion.
Posted by Pimphand
Member since Sep 2021
5814 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Let's not forget Texas and OU flirting with Larry Scott and the Pac10 (and attempting to bring/force A&M and OSU along for the ride). That was very, very close to reality - and ultimately what set the first wave of big12 defections (Colorado, Nebraska, A&M, Mizzou) in motion.


You have a sequencing issue there baw....

December 2009 Big Ten announced it was exploring expansion.

March 2010 Pinkel whined about Big 12 and praised the Big Ten

May 12, 2010 Missouri governor publicly advocated for Missouri to join the Big Ten.

Don't know the exact date that Nebraska got envious but you can tell from this Stewart Mandel article written June 4, 2010 at SI.com

quote:

Texas isn't necessarily looking to flock West -- but it almost certainly would if Nebraska bolts to the Big Ten. (Texas reportedly has little interest in the SEC, mainly for academic reasons.) Of course, we don't yet know whether the Big Ten is serious about the Huskers or whether they'll have to make a decision before the Longhorns make theirs.


Exactly one week after that article was published Nebraska officially applied, the next day the Big Ten voted them in, and the next day Nebraska officially accepted.

It was always the Big Ten starting it, y'all expressing interest which got the Huskers motivated that triggered everything. You are unable to pin that on mean evil Texas & OU full stop.

Also if you really think Larry Scott who was a bumbling idiot was the mastermind
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74446 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:56 am to
WJOX in Bham has been talking about this whole Texas Tech deal all morning. A moment ago they mentioned the Texas court has scheduled the trial to take place in February 20207, two weeks after the national championship game.

Texas Tech look like a joke, but this Texas court looks even worse.
Posted by LOTOTiger
Member since May 2025
274 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:59 am to
So - a Texas judge made his ruling that Sorsby can play for Tech. What is stopping the teams they are playing against from seeking an injunction in their own states to prevent him from playing in their jurisdictions (they have 4 road games outside of Texas)?

In other words, why shouldn't Colorado seek an injunction from a Colorado court (with a judge who has a degree from CU) to prevent Sorsby (an ineligible player per the rules) from playing in Colorado? They also play in Oregon (Oregon State), Ohio (Cinci), and Oklahoma (OSU).
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
32656 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

WJOX in Bham has been talking about this whole Texas Tech deal all morning. A moment ago they mentioned the Texas court has scheduled the trial to take place in February 20207, two weeks after the national championship game.

Texas Tech look like a joke, but this Texas court looks even worse.


Actually that is a normal court cycle don’t blame them.

The problem is TT gamed the court system knowing full well if they got a judge to grant this now that was the win because of the timing. They knew it would not be heard until after the season. And then it would be dropped because its too late. That was their plan all along. And they knew no judge in Tx would deny it because its election year and football is so big in Tx they could not deny it else risk losing their seat by unhappy fans and money makers.

Posted by bulldawger
Fish Creek, GA
Member since Jul 2010
3097 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:


Actually that is a normal court cycle don’t blame them.

The problem is TT gamed the court system knowing full well if they got a judge to grant this now that was the win because of the timing. They knew it would not be heard until after the season. And then it would be dropped because its too late. That was their plan all along. And they knew no judge in Tx would deny it because its election year and football is so big in Tx they could not deny it else risk losing their seat by unhappy fans and money makers.



This is why boycotting TT should happen immediately.

The Big 12 should take the lead on this. It affects the conference more than anyone else. And if they don't, I would be for expanding the boycott to the entire Big 12. Their inaction only enables TT.
Posted by Forrestgrump
Member since Jan 2019
100 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 12:45 pm to
Being lectured to by an OU guy is priceless. You guys have been dirty forever. Joe Mixon.
Posted by TailbackU
ATL
Member since Oct 2005
13591 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

he's free to play, but any game he plays in will be a forefit by Tech


That’s a good idea.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
32656 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:11 pm to
HeyTech Bot stay on topic. This is about Tech rostering a known admitted gambler and being ok with breaking the cardinal rule of gambling in sports.

You are trying to deflect constantly because you know 100% TT is screwing up. And you and your bot fans can’t escape it. He bet on his own team. Thats illegal. He has insider info.

Taco Tech managed to unify the entire sports world against them this may never happen again.
Posted by Gunny Hartman
Member since Jan 2021
1358 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Nebraska followed suit and got the invitation your school so desperately wanted.


Mizzou was offered a spot in the Big 10 but the payouts would have been graduated and were not 100% for a few years. Mizzou rejected that. Its not like NU stole Mizzous spot. They both could have gone. Instead Mizzou went to the SEC and got paid a full share from day one. I don't know if NU had to accept partial payouts initially.
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
50470 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by Hback
Member since Aug 2017
13911 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:35 pm to
What'd she say? I was distracted ...
Posted by byrt bulimia
Member since Oct 2015
38 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:38 pm to
This is how we actually get college sports back. No one is forcing anyone to accept transfers or pay players. If everyone or 80 percent would refuse and then no schedule anyone who did….we could get college sports back.
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
50470 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

What'd she say? I was distracted .


Posted by tBrand
Member since Oct 2022
4258 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Mizzou was offered a spot in the Big 10 but the payouts would have been graduated and were not 100% for a few years.

That's what Mizzou fans say to make themselves feel better about not getting a B1G invitation.

quote:

October 6, 2011 / 7:10 AM CDT / CBS Texas

ST. LOUIS (AP) - Missouri is hoping to join the Southeastern Conference but would have preferred an offer from the Big Ten that never came, a university official said Wednesday.

Missouri hoped to join the Big Ten last year but the league instead chose Nebraska. The university official said the Big Ten remains Missouri's top choice but that conference "has no interest."

"That's what's left," the official said, referring to the SEC. The official, who is familiar with school discussions involving conference affiliation, spoke on condition of anonymity because the school has not commented publicly about its intentions.
Posted by Hilonghorn9
Member since Oct 2024
971 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 1:59 pm to
It’s almost as if he knew the gameplan to start out was going to be establish the run and pound the rock early and often
Posted by JeffLebowski
Member since Feb 2015
2840 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 2:09 pm to
Good! frick this fricking kid and these fricking judges who don’t understand the rule of law. Also, if it’s going to be like this, then Pete Rose immediately needs to be inducted into the baseball Hall of Fame.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter