Started By
Message

re: Monday Will Be Interesting. Don't Shoot the Messenger.

Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86571 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:02 pm to
I agree-Also-what about the tiny little detail of school enrollment?
Posted by Quicksilver
Poker Room
Member since Jan 2013
13324 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:03 pm to
Then LSU becomes party to discovery which could be tricky if the allegations of them encouraging the lawsuit
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11322 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:03 pm to
LSU won’t be instigating this, but the SEC was late to the rule announcement.

If they announced before this all started we wouldn’t be here.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11322 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:05 pm to
And what discovery do you think that would be, that lsu contacted college eligible athletes by law of the American Justice system?
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 7:06 pm
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
47065 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:06 pm to
It definitely affects the players. It decreases their earning potential if the SEC Coaches can't take them
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11322 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:07 pm to
Definitely an argument made by the plantiffs
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
12594 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

And what discovery do you think that would be, that lsu contacted college eligible athletes by law of the American Justice system?


Well for one, they weren't eligible when LSU contacted them about filing a lawsuit to gain eligibility...
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
15634 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

which could be tricky if the allegations of them encouraging the lawsuit


Ole Miss encouraged the Trinidad Chambliss lawsuit. LOIC.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11322 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:11 pm to
That would be interesting to prove that LSU orchestrated this entire thing. I don’t see that as likely.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
12594 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

I don’t see that as likely.


Considering the multiple national media reports saying they did, it's probably not something LSU wants to roll the dice on with discovery.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15432 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

It is highly likely that the 33 plaintiffs of the 2022 5 to play 5 will now sue the SEC like they sued the NCAA.


How?

The NCAA said you can't play. Of course they got sued.

The SEC didn't say that. They said their member institutions will get penalized if they play these players. And it won the vote of its members.

There's no tort there.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11322 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:13 pm to
The class action lawsuit was done in June 2026 by 18 players in Colorado. You think LSU was behind that?
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 7:15 pm
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86571 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:15 pm to
Discovery can go both ways. What about the idea that the SEC office planned and orchestrated the timing of this to force legislation-intentionally harming this one class of athletes?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66917 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:16 pm to
Lol they ran with a story a nobody posted on Twitter. No sauces revealed.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
12594 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

You think LSU was behind that?


The August 2026 lawsuit in Louisiana which this entire thread discussion is based off of? Personally, no idea. But plenty in the national media certainly seem to think so.

The Colorado lawsuit is wholly irrelevant to the Louisiana lawsuit as Colorado is federal and Louisiana is state. At least until the plaintiffs in Louisiana try to sue the SEC and it gets dragged into federal court. Where the federal court has currently prohibited players from playing would be the precedent.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11322 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Federal appeals courts temporarily halted blanket preliminary injunctions favoring the players, leaving eligibility status dependent on individual state-level restraining orders.


You really want to go down this road?
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38706 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:19 pm to
This ends one of two ways



All players under TRO play or none do.




OM better start loving kiffin again
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
15634 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

How?

The SEC is deeming them ineligible based on an inconsistently applied definition of a “professional.”
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
27025 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Liss of income. If they have to go play in the mountains west the sec is denying them the chance to make money.

I’m going to sue Harvard Business School on the same grounds. This is genius.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
12594 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

You really want to go down this road?


If they sue the SEC, there is no avenue for them to get a state court TRO or injunction against the SEC.

The entirety of the players v. SEC lawsuit would be in federal court. They can't get a state TRO if the lawsuit isn't in state court.

In order for a state court to grant a TRO on a case, the case actually has to be before them in state court. A court can't grant something in a case that's sitting in an entirely different jurisdiction.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter