Crowknowsbest
| Favorite team: | Georgia |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 27157 |
| Registered on: | 5/11/2012 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Will Kirby go the way of Dabo?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/22/26 at 3:28 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
It's amazing how far schools fall when everyone can legally pay players....
Agreed. Now even shitty programs like South Carolina can pay 5*s enough to outweigh the development deficit.
re: Will Kirby go the way of Dabo?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/22/26 at 3:22 pm to cajuntiger1010
So far, his NIL/portal strategy seems pretty prudent. I do think we’ll become more transfer friendly over time, but so far the priority has been retention, for good reason.
re: Bijan Robinson calls out a clear culture problem that's infecting the Texas Longhorns
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/21/26 at 11:08 am to CT Hooktip
Bijan is probably a bit outdated in his commentary, but I do think every program has a “type” who they tend to attract. Sark/Texas’ type probably isn’t as committed to football as a passion than someone who chooses an OSU, Georgia, or Alabama. That isn’t permanent, but it’s probably been true for 15-20 years.
re: America, Bud Light, Cracker Barrel, etc, etc
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/19/26 at 1:15 pm to meansonny
quote:
The only explanation that I can think of for going to the larger playoff format is to placate those funding the athletes.
I think this is correct. It’s an empty way for college to show their boosters some level of ROI. Emphasis on empty.
There are successful people out there annually giving seven figures to sustain the rosters of football teams that will be lucky to go 7-5. Texas has a $50M, 8-4ish football team. Colleges are desperate to keep those donations going, even if they’d all be better off by letting booster fatigue set in and restore some sanity to the marketplace.
re: Now that everyone is sober and thinking clearly…
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/18/26 at 6:20 am to Jefferson Dawg
I kept having flashbacks to the 2019 South Carolina game.
Our depth at safety is a real problem. It also appears that we’ve totally whiffed on every edge signed over the past 3-4 years. Yesterday it felt like Cole and Wilson were the only guys who could tackle their QB.
Our depth at safety is a real problem. It also appears that we’ve totally whiffed on every edge signed over the past 3-4 years. Yesterday it felt like Cole and Wilson were the only guys who could tackle their QB.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 9:59 am to bigDgator
quote:
Insignificant bowl games do not matter to players.
They weren’t insignificant and did matter to players before playoffs existed.
quote:
Also now teams can schedule other good teams and still get in the playoffs, giving us more good football to watch.
The 12-team “era” would indicate that the opposite is true. Maybe this is true for Georgia and Ohio State, but it is almost certainly not true for most of the top 25.
I’ll grant TCU 2014 as a particularly strong 5/6, but that outlier isn’t convincing enough to me to say that the system really needed overhauling.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 9:16 am to bigDgator
quote:
special season.
That’s extremely generous.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 9:11 am to bigDgator
quote:
But you think someone or some group of people can decide among 130+ teams who should be deserving? I bet you are also the first person to criticize the selection committee too.
Can you provide any examples where the #5 ranked team in the BCS or 4-team playoff era had a great argument to be ranked #2?
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:58 am to bigDgator
quote:
None of that has or will change.
:lol:
They’ve spent the last 15 years blowing up conferences and traditional matchups with reckless abandon.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:55 am to Afrojedi
quote:
Because championships were only part of college football. College football is about regionality, its about beating your rival, its about the pageantry of a blustery fall Saturday morning, its was so much more than ratings and playoffs. If you like pro sports where the only thing that matters is playoff seeding then thats fine, go watch the NFL. Thats not what college football is about and a lot of people have either forgotten that or never got to experience it in the first place so they dont know what they are giving up.
Quoting for emphasis. I grew up cheering for some pretty average Georgia teams and got addicted anyway because of things that have nothing to do with winning the national championship.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:52 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Not who gets healthy or lucky in the playoffs.
Not talked about enough.
For example, March Madness is a great, entertaining tournament, but a shitty method for deciding who the actual “best” team is.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:49 am to bigDgator
quote:
So you think a #4 ranked team out of 130+ teams is undeserving of making the post season? In what universe are you talking about? That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
I do not think they are as deserving as the #2 team.
The #4 team is usually perfectly deserving of playing for its conference championship and a major bowl, which both seemed to matter quite a lot before the playoff became everything anyone talked about.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:31 am to bigDgator
quote:
So you don't think a team ranked #5 could win the playoff, or deserved to be in the playoff, or what here?
In the vast majority of seasons, #5 had a notably worse resume than #2.
In the BCS era, #3 got fricked over a couple times. Anyone past that was always undeserving. Whether they “could win” is irrelevant, because they didn’t win enough to get there.
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:22 am to Dr Rosenrosen
quote:
I mean would you rather watch 9-3 Mizzou go the CFP or the Music City Bowl?
Who gives a shite either way (other than Missouri fans)?
re: Why the 24-Team playoff hate?
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/16/26 at 8:09 am to Pvt Hudson
quote:
Doesn’t make the regular basketball season meaningless
Meaningless? No.
Less interesting and lower stakes? 100% yes.
re: 2027-28 CFP odds have been released...
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/15/26 at 3:31 pm to Master of Sinanju
quote:
Lol. I guess it would take 4 losses to keep those teams out of an expanded playoff.
At least 4, maybe 5
re: Sources: The College Football Playoff is nearing a deal to expand to 24 teams in 2027
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/15/26 at 3:01 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
I’ll tell you this, it’s a tough scene when your argument for your team is we played a shitty USC team close
:lol:
I actually agree with him that the first round could be mostly competitive, but that’s only because teams 9-24 are typically average at best and isn’t a credit to the new layout. The real carnage will be in round 2.
re: Sources: The College Football Playoff is nearing a deal to expand to 24 teams in 2027
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/15/26 at 2:56 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
We all eagerly await the day that the #23 seed upsets the #10, at which point America will get the pleasure of watching #23 lose by 30 on the road at #2 as a 3+ TD underdog.
This will all be worth it.
This will all be worth it.
re: Sources: The College Football Playoff is nearing a deal to expand to 24 teams in 2027
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/15/26 at 1:55 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
gives middle tier power programs and small schools a punchers chance on the big stage.
:lol:
re: Sources: The College Football Playoff is nearing a deal to expand to 24 teams in 2027
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/15/26 at 1:45 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
I guarantee you the ratings for these playoff games are great and they’re highly competitive.
That seems like a great trade-off for butchering the drama of top 10 matchups throughout the season.
re: NY Times - Ranking CFB's Biggest Underachievers of All Time
Posted by Crowknowsbest on 10/15/26 at 9:23 am to FAT SEXY
With Florida, I think the author is making the mistake of thinking that the demographic advantages they’ve enjoyed since the ~70s have always existed. That’s true for other southern schools as well. Florida was not a densely populated state, historically, and that’s reflected in their all time win totals.
Popular
0











