Started By
Message

re: LSU fans are calling this a win?? They are kidding right??

Posted on 9/11/26 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by Thorny
Montgomery, AL
Member since May 2008
2440 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Seems Lane quit doing what the lawsuit accused him of. He didn't fight this lawsuit.


Funny, I was under the impression that lawsuit contained accusations that would proceed even if Lane didn't roster Wright and Harris.

I'm sure I read that somewhere.
Posted by gamecockman12
Columbia, SC
Member since Aug 2012
8558 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 2:48 pm to
LSU back tracked so.damn fast.
Posted by That LSU Guy
Public Enemy #1 & #2
Member since Jul 2008
16554 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by stopitnow1
Florida
Member since Mar 2013
3390 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 3:54 pm to
As in from before the judge told the sec to come back with legitimate proof. Do you have down syndrome? Legitimate question here.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
33113 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 4:29 pm to
Which players were Lane trying to recruit to LSU?
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
22220 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

I didn't know an NFL team offered him a head coaching position.


As to whether he was formally "offered" an NFL HC job, IDK either. I do know his name was mentioned for the NY Giants opening (one of my former colleagues, avid Giants fan, informed me and see below).

Athlon Sports

So which is it? Like the OP asserts, i.e., at first opportunity? Or never, due to his Oakland baggage?
Posted by stopitnow1
Florida
Member since Mar 2013
3390 posts
Posted on 9/11/26 at 7:03 pm to
Lane was contacted by the players to come to LSU and old piss actually reached out to them. Lane told the players if it fits within the rules then come play. This is according to Deaquan wright when he got interviewed after the louisiana court judge said they could play, but since it didn't fit within the rules from the biased SEC they didn't play or even get rostered.
Posted by Dawgs2122
Member since Dec 2024
3375 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 2:27 am to
OK, well we have the last 2 natties in the conference and if winning the conference is nothing, I gotta ask, what is losing it...as LSU did the last time you came to Atlanta LOL
Posted by Dawgs2122
Member since Dec 2024
3375 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 2:36 am to
I've posted multiple quotes from chancellors and presidents across the board. I don't have to prove a negative...not how it works. Their are multiple public statements that indicate unity. I have no reason to doubt as other statements seem to back them up. You are making the claim that these are lies. You get to provide the proof. These are basics of debate taught in grade school. Oh wait - Checks Rankings - Louisiana - 49.
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12601 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 6:11 am to
This is already over, the SEC is going to hope it just fades away.
LSU already decided they're not rostering the players, so no rules were broken.

The SEC suing in Federal court is where they really screwed the pooch.
That trial won't happen. They'll be sued by the players and will settle out of court and walk away with their tails tucked.

All 50 states in the United States possess sovereign immunity, meaning they are protected from certain types of lawsuits unless they choose to waive that protection.

I assure you Louisiana will NOT waive that protection in this case. The Louisiana AG has already stated this.

Under this immunity, states (including arms of the state like LSU) cannot be sued in Federal court without the states consent (not happening).

The SEC fricked up. Sorry you guys got all excited.

Spot the ball.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
22197 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 6:18 am to
quote:

coach who's going to leave you for the first NFL golden egg to come his way.


I don’t think he’s leaving.

College: unlimited free agency every year

Pro: you get 5 to 10 draft choices and maybe 3-8 free agent deals in a big year.


College: 10 wins at LSU gets you in playoffs, 3 cupcakes per year

Pro: no cupcakes. 10 wins puts you on the road in playoffs.

No, Lane will be going in dry in the SEC for the next 25 years.
Posted by flagshipuniversity
Camden SC, Charlotte NC
Member since Jul 2024
662 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 6:42 am to
quote:

I don’t think he’s leaving.

College: unlimited free agency every year

Pro: you get 5 to 10 draft choices and maybe 3-8 free agent deals in a big year.


College: 10 wins at LSU gets you in playoffs, 3 cupcakes per year

Pro: no cupcakes. 10 wins puts you on the road in playoffs.

No, Lane will be going in dry in the SEC for the next 25 years.
The NFL... no coddling high school kids and kissing their a$$ to try to sway them. No year around recruiting and several months of free time in the off season. CFB offers no coach a day off and recuring is year-round. The NFL pays more on average also. I would say any coach with a brain would rather coach at he NFL level than to deal with kids, parents, administrators and worse of all... the damn boosters who really run the programs. Lane would jump in a heartbeat and who could blame him. Geez..
Posted by flagshipuniversity
Camden SC, Charlotte NC
Member since Jul 2024
662 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Fishhead
It's not as simple as you want to make it. Congress can abrogate immunity in certain contexts, and some suits may continue to proceed under specific doctrines and officer-based theories.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
29709 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 7:35 am to
Everything is a win to them. They think their frat boy predator is the next Saban
Posted by terriblegreen
Spokane, LA
Member since Aug 2011
12878 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:07 am to
We don’t care. You just typed a paragraph no one will read.
Posted by ulmtiger
Member since Jan 2008
2584 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:07 am to
The decisions of the SEC are going to likely be litigated for some time. I believe it is the NCAAs untimely decision 5/5 that created this mess but the SECs unequal decision on how to manage the NCAAs ruling is the basis of the problem. My guess is those who have an interest in legal process and outcome will enjoy this more than those who are entertained by sports.
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
10815 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:17 am to
quote:

LSU back tracked so.damn fast.

How do? They were pretty adamant the entire time of what they would do. And then did it
Posted by Tenn grad LSU fan
Woulhuntdn't you like to know spazz
Member since Apr 2023
1508 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 8:30 am to
It must be something about that part of the country
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12601 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:03 am to
quote:

It's not as simple as you want to make it. Congress can abrogate immunity in certain contexts, and some suits may continue to proceed under specific doctrines and officer-based theories.

Yet nothing happened, nothing will.

Also, who's the Speaker of the House?
This post was edited on 9/12/26 at 9:06 am
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12601 posts
Posted on 9/12/26 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Everything is a win to them
Anyone who doesn't already see who lost is blind. Did LSU 'win'? No. We got nothing out of it.
But they didn't get their candy asses handed to them like Sankey and all you cucks wishing LSU lost.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter