Started By
Message

re: Guys coming back?

Posted on 1/7/21 at 11:08 am to
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
19202 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 11:08 am to
Agree
Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7956 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 11:40 am to
quote:

About sums it up. Glad he isn't coming back, especially breaking in a new OL



Haynes King's mobility in the pocket and on the run should be a huge help with the new OL.
Posted by AggieBruh
HTine
Member since Oct 2018
345 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 11:44 am to
As long as he doesn't get hurt. I hope he puts some weight on, he is a twig currently.
Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7956 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 11:54 am to
quote:

As long as he doesn't get hurt. I hope he puts some weight on, he is a twig currently.



we've heard that shite before

King is going to be special....like the first good Bama QB under Saban

Coach's son

Never lost

State champion

Fast as Johnny

Can drop dimes

Perfect QB frame - really long arms

Kid is humble as frick

Watch his 2018 highlights - JFF who?
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
21778 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 12:18 pm to
King lost two whole games in high school. Two
Posted by AggieBruh
HTine
Member since Oct 2018
345 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 12:34 pm to
I'm not saying he won't be good, I think he will be. Just saying I hope he doesn't get hurt having to scramble and extend plays behind a fresh OL with limited options at OT currently.
Posted by ObtuseAggie512
Member since Sep 2019
74 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 12:45 pm to
Kenyon Green and Layden Robinson will anchor it down. Hopefully we get to see the next great Offensive line develop next season.
Posted by Texas Gentleman
Texas
Member since Sep 2015
2616 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

It's a weird feeling to be appreciative of what he did for A&M and what he accomplished during his time here while also being relieved that he is heading to the NFL.


Yep. Appreciate the games he won, including our best bowl win since the natty in 39, but also glad he’s going to move on to the NFL.

I think this was the best decision for all parties. Mond goes out on top as a NY6 bowl winner and we can move on to the next generation of QB.

Let’s be honest, if he had come back for another season and won fewer games and not made a NY6 bowl or better again, the fan base that’s already divided over him would’ve turned more against him.

And I’ll still say I think he’s at his ceiling, another year of college isn’t going to help him out draft position or otherwise.
Posted by NanosTacoRun
Member since Jun 2015
2983 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 2:05 pm to
Hocker announced he's going pro
Posted by dabadger
Houston
Member since Jun 2015
115 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 2:15 pm to
Was really hoping Hocker would stay. Carson Green is the last of the 4 OL to announce and I can't imagine he would stay. Next year could be a bit rough breaking in 4 new OL and a new QB.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58035 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Yep. Appreciate the games he won, including our best bowl win since the natty in 39, but also glad he’s going to move on to the NFL.


This Orange Bowl win was not better than any of our Cotton Bowl wins. A step above the Peach vs Duke is as high as I'd rank it.

(ranking order = AP-Coaches-BCS)

'41 Cotton - 13-12 over #12 Fordham (7-1) - beating an Eastern power was a big deal at the time LINK
'68 Cotton - 20-16 over #8/7 Alabama (8-1-1) - Bear carries Stallings off the field LINK
'86 Cotton - 36-16 over #16/15 Auburn (8-3) - Tigers had Heisman winner Bo Jackson LINK
'88 Cotton - 35-10 over #12/12 Notre Dame (8-3) - had Heisman winner Tim Brown LINK
'13 Cotton - 41-13 over #12/12/11 Oklahoma (10-2) - put a cherry on top of our move from the Big 12 LINK
This post was edited on 1/7/21 at 3:50 pm
Posted by RoscoeHarper
Edmond, OK
Member since Aug 2011
4538 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 4:10 pm to
For what it means on a national scale, I'd put it ahead of every bowl game except the '40 Sugar, '41 Cotton and '13 Cotton.
Posted by WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
Member since Jan 2013
13840 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

A step above the Peach vs Duke 


I guess but that was an epic game thread. Made it a lot more fun to watch. I think Tmc and me posted every cat gif on the internet that night.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50200 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 6:11 pm to
Technically the Cotton Bowl in 13 wasn’t a BCS bowl and the Orange is an NY6.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58035 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 6:21 pm to
Technically sure.

But OU was ranked higher and is a much bigger brand name, they didn't have most of their offense opt, there was much more hype b/c of Johnny and the A&M vs Big 12 angle, and it was on FOX instead of ESPN which gave it a bigger audience of 11.2 million vs 7.58 million.
This post was edited on 1/7/21 at 6:22 pm
Posted by GalvoAg
Galveston TX
Member since Apr 2012
10835 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 6:36 pm to
The Orange Bowl is bigger no matter how you slice it.
Posted by Texas Weazel
Louisiana is a shithole
Member since Oct 2016
8528 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 7:39 pm to
Yup. That Cotton Bowl didn't feel "big". It was a good game, but it was no Sugar Bowl (which Florida got).
Posted by Texas Gentleman
Texas
Member since Sep 2015
2616 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 8:38 pm to
Disagree.

NY6 > non NY6 it’s as simple as that. Team rankings, views, whatever, doesn’t matter. There’s the BCS/NY6 bowls and then there’s the rest. Cotton wasn’t one until CFP started a few years back.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
21778 posts
Posted on 1/7/21 at 9:16 pm to
Seriously, the interview that TexAgs had with Mond is great. He's going to interview well for the draft, and be drafted higher than some believe
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58035 posts
Posted on 1/8/21 at 9:40 am to
The Cotton was one of the major bowls until the Big 12 was created. Don't really care that it wasn't a so called NY6 for the 2012 season when it became one the a little over a year later Considering the ranking of the teams involved and the star power on the field it was functionally a NY6 that season. Also, a big game is a big game. If there was a NY6 that had a team w/a mediocre record in it I wouldn't consider it a big game anymore like when a 6-4-1 Notre Dame made the Fiesta Bowl in 1995. It was a Bowl Alliance game but ND was shite and shouldn't have been there. A forced label doesn't mean much at the end of the day. Kind of like how I'm never going to called our Peach Bowl the Chick-Fil-A Bowl. Was it technically that name in our year? Sure. But it was still the Peach Bowl.
This post was edited on 1/8/21 at 9:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter