Started By
Message

re: Truth. I’ll write this and then hillbillies can’t vote it down.

Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:32 am to
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49089 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:32 am to
Melt
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14098 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:37 am to
By the time A&M wins anything, I’m not sure anyone will still be watching college football.

If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it, did A&M really win anything?
Posted by Hback
Member since Aug 2017
9180 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I have issues with rats,bitches and quitters and A&m has the trifecta

Dayuum … from the top rope!
Posted by agswin
The Republic of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
4339 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:38 am to
Big Sneezy, the problem most of these people don't realize is the NCAA is gone. SCOTUS ruled while most the SEC sat around waiting for marching orders from Finebaum.

The NIL timing was perfect for the Aggies. Our former students have money, a desire to return it (legally) to our athletes.

Our Big Money Ags aka BMA's quickly set up the legal process to act quickly. We were among the first but there will be others who will quickly fall in line.

Change is difficult but college football has changed. I personally don't like it either, but it is what it is.



Posted by LSUBALLER
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
16053 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:42 am to
When one of the student athletes shots or rapes somebody and their employer is held responsible, then what happens. NiL makes the kids employees.
This post was edited on 5/21/22 at 9:42 am
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3322 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:42 am to
Agreed. We are finally playing the game but will the results be there
————

Finally playing the game?

A&M’s recruiting ranking has been around the top 5 for the last several years.

That said, surely you don’t believe going forward A&M will continue to bring in SMU equivalent classes considering other programs are establishing collectives and regulations are coming.

Posted by LSUBALLER
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
16053 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:42 am to
So Big sleepy is righ and everybody else is wrong! Ok
Posted by TideFaninFl
On the space coast
Member since Oct 2017
6620 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:46 am to
I was not talking about the ncaa. If the players do not play on the field, you think those boosters will continue to pay them? People who make a lot of money do not usually waste it very often.

While I see your point about former students, you think they will continue to flush their money if Texas Am does not improve?

UTexas has top recruiting classes for years, 1 NC since 1970
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18302 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:48 am to
The solution is to change the sport rules that can neutralize the big talent advantage. Spread offense proliferation is a part of that.
Posted by agswin
The Republic of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
4339 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:48 am to
quote:

The only reason A&M pulled in the class they did is because they were the only ones breaking the rules.


Please cite those rules that have been broken. The world needs to know.

BTW the majority of that signing class is from the Houston area which is approximately and hour to an hour and half away from campus.
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
1727 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:49 am to
Except for the hillbilly silliness in the post title, which was just gratuitous chain tugging, I actually agree with you, completely. We’re so far through the looking glass that Alice ain’t never gonna find her way home, and Congress and the courts IMO ain’t gonna save the NCAA’s bacon, they’re more likely to step up the pace of the change for reasons that have zilch to do with the sport’s best interests.

People who think otherwise are delusional, although IMO the biggest reason for the ire is the fact that for all intents and purposes, the interests of the fans who pay the bills and have supported these programs over generations have been rendered irrelevant in these changes.

Except you yourself said it will not necessarily translate into wins, which at the end of the day is still going to be how programs are assessed.

Plus even though an argument absolutely can be made that this is capitalism and the free market at work, at the end of the day can it truly be said that it’s the best thing for the sport? IMO coaches and players and yes even programs (hello Nebraska, Texas and Tennessee) are transitory. The sport endures.
Posted by V Bainbridge
Member since Jul 2020
7795 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Texas and A&M and USC will be the Yankees in this world.

Always trying to attach yourselves to others success

You bought a good class. Congrats. You have to do something with it before you talk shite like this man. Aggie is a middle tier school.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93646 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Here’s the truth. College football has changed. This game is BIG business. Schools are making millions of dollars and networks making BILLIONS.

Off of 17 year old kids. Off of children. That frequently are from poor homes.

You know what that’s called? Exploitation.

So it hasn't changed at all.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20855 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 10:00 am to
10 seasons played in the sec west and they havent won shite. A decade.
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
15872 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 10:10 am to
As a verified hillbilly, I did not downvote you. Not because you are right, your whole premise is wrong, but because your ignorant, incoherent, communist rambling were not worthy of a down vote.

You equated capitalism to exploitation. Which is odd. Then you say the system must be rebuilt, why is the starting point of liberal/progressive/communist ALWAYS the system must be destroyed and rebuilt? The “labor must be fairly paid”, “eat the rich”, “it’s exploitation”, that’s bullshite.

The answer it a free market solution. The return on investment in these athletes is not new, but the money used openly is. And it’s not sustainable. TAMU boosters are not going to spend 20 million a year to buy 8-4 teams. The issue is self correcting. Yes some athletes will with see stupid money, they always have. But the sport will settle back down. Just like we are seeing the transfer portal strand hundreds of kids that don’t have slots is slowing down the transfer portal, we will see the same in the NIL stuff.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Off of 17 year old kids. Off of children. That frequently are from poor homes.

You know what that’s called? Exploitation.


Aren't they considered adults at 18 in the eyes of the law? Pretty sure it isn't exploitation.

quote:

Schools are making millions of dollars and networks making BILLIONS.
This is not shocking. It's called business. If your point is that college football is business then you are correct.

quote:

It’s called the free market. It’s legal. And it’s here.

I thought it was called exploitation. Now I am confused.

Posted by exiledhogfan
Missouri
Member since Jul 2021
1227 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 12:03 pm to
I thought Bama fans were Gumps.

Damn, I'm behind.
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
15872 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

What they both have in common is money. Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit.


TAMU doesn’t have the money to keep renting players. The return on investment has to be there and at TAMU it’s just not there.

And are using yankee in the general sense or the baseball club sense. Because in the general sense yankee implies over educated idiots that choose to be broke by living in pockets of pseudo civilization. The club would align more with Texas than TAMU.
Posted by Poichess
Member since Jun 2019
790 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 12:31 pm to
$1 million for the top rated recruit is not irrational to me
Posted by Colonel Ingus
Houston
Member since Nov 2021
5385 posts
Posted on 5/21/22 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Now do last 30 years and titles

Do recruits care about what happened 13 years before they were born?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter