Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss files lawsuit against two LSU players
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:28 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:28 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Wait yall gave em all the money up front?
If I was a moron, I would think this would be relevant, like you do.
0
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:29 pm to ipodking
quote:
The ultimate pussy move by the ultimate little brother university
The ultimate pussy move would be to allow $1 million to just walk away.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:30 pm to Bigbens42
They are big boys now making big boy money and making big boy decisions.
They should lawyer up, and get ready to pay up.
They should lawyer up, and get ready to pay up.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:30 pm to Jebadeb
These are adults who signed a contract. They are FA'ing and now they are FO'ing.
Getting exactly what they deserve.
Getting exactly what they deserve.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:31 pm to Landmass
quote:
The ultimate pussy move would be to allow $1 million to just walk away.
Sounds like OM is poor...
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:33 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
If the timeline Ole Miss spelled out there is factual then this is not intentionally timed. In fact it looks like good faith attempts were made.
I mean they did wait 4 months after the last rejection before filing the lawsuit when it looked like they were on a monthly basis prior.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:33 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
Sounds like OM is poor...
lol, we set a donation record this year, doubled the last record.
It's still $1 million. You would be a fricking moron to just let it walk. But apparently LSURulzSEC has all the millions in the world.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:37 pm to hubreb
You have to be petty to do this. Sounds like some real bitches in Oxford.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:38 pm to Landmass
quote:
lol, we set a donation record this year, doubled the last record.
and still couldn't keep Lane in OM...
quote:
It's still $1 million. You would be a fricking moron to just let it walk.
Who said anyone was letting it walk? Who said it wasn't going to be paid back? Just because its not happening on OM's timeline doesn't mean the players will eventually pay it back or LSU, thing is OM just walked into a bad looking situation that will now be used against them in recruiting and yall don't even realize it...
and OM is the last school to be clutching pearls over contracts now with an investigation underway for tampering...
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:39 pm to Jebadeb
quote:
Suing players is a bad look.
Not honoring contractual obligations is a bad look.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:42 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
Who said it wasn't going to be paid back? Just because its not happening on OM's timeline doesn't mean the players will eventually pay it back
If you were a business owner, how long would you let a past due debt sit there? Because under the signed contract this became past due in February
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:43 pm to rebsfan10
Honestly this has nothing to do with LSU unless they told the players they would pay it. The contract was between the school and the 2 players.
Not sure why LSU fans are so butthurt by this. If any players on our roster signed contracts with other schools that clearly spells out the language of what they owe should they not fulfill their obligations, I would say the players need to pay it. Charlie Weiss has language in his contract of what has to be paid to lsu if he leaves for another head coaching job in the sec, so you're saying he shouldn't have to pay that if he became the bama oc next year?
Not sure why LSU fans are so butthurt by this. If any players on our roster signed contracts with other schools that clearly spells out the language of what they owe should they not fulfill their obligations, I would say the players need to pay it. Charlie Weiss has language in his contract of what has to be paid to lsu if he leaves for another head coaching job in the sec, so you're saying he shouldn't have to pay that if he became the bama oc next year?
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:43 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Wait yall gave em all the money up front?
They didn’t. It was a year long contract with a buyout clause. The players exercised the buyout clause but didn’t pay the buyout. The amount they were paid or going to be paid is irrelevant. I’m sure the money was spread out like every other college football player contact.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:43 pm to LSURulzSEC
It’s going to be used against LSU, no one will want to hop into the portal to transfer there bc LSU doesn’t take care of their players. Once the rev share was signed, LSU should’ve agreed to cover their buyout expense or at least warned them that they’d be on the hook for it.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:48 pm to ukraine_rebel
quote:
no one will want to hop into the portal to transfer there bc LSU doesn’t take care of their players.
Lmfao
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:48 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Ole Miss couldn't be more obvious with their frivolous bs
If it was so obvious then why didn't they pay, you dumbass?
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:49 pm to hubreb
This will be outstanding for recruiting.....
Is this the same school that was openly caught tampering with the Clemson kid?
Is this the same school that was openly caught tampering with the Clemson kid?
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:51 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
This will be outstanding for recruiting.....
Yeah, a very bad look for LSU. Advising the kids to transfer and then leaving them high and dry because the children's hospital money well has dried up.
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:51 pm to Che Boludo
quote:How would they not immediately be sued For the Clemson player then? Do you understand how many lawsuits come after this one if it's won lol.
I bet every admin/coach in CFB (save LSU in this case... but maybe kind of a little) are hoping Ole Miss wins and a message is sent.
You think your hands are clean bama fan?
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:52 pm to ukraine_rebel
quote:
It’s going to be used against LSU
Not its not, even if its tried, it will fail...
quote:
no one will want to hop into the portal to transfer there bc LSU doesn’t take care of their players.
and you know this how? how do you know LSU doesn't take care of players? because this hasn't been paid back yet in a contract that LSU is not even a part of?
quote:
LSU should’ve agreed to cover their buyout expense or at least warned them that they’d be on the hook for it.
again how do you know they haven't been told they will?
If I were a betting man...I am betting LSU will eventually cover this, but its going to be on THEIR time line, not Ole Miss' especially since OM only cares about contracts when it affects them...
This is a bad look for OM, no matter how you try to spin it, its not good...
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News