03 West CoChamps
| Favorite team: | Ole Miss  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1107 |
| Registered on: | 9/3/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Here’s why UF is a 3.5 point favorite
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/24/26 at 10:32 am to Dixie.Reb
Our defensive front 7 is miles better than any front 7 they have seen. Our offense is miles better than any offense they have seen. If we don't lay a stinker in the 1Q because of a hangover I think we win.
4
re: LSU 40- am 10 Ole Miss 7 Florida 58
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/24/26 at 9:14 am to Bamatide69
quote:
LSU 40- am 10 Ole Miss 7 Florida 58
I thought this meant you were drunk off 40s at 10:00 in the morning.
re: Sumrall really wanted the Auburn job
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/23/26 at 12:37 pm to Gatorbait2008
quote:
Most people would want the UF job over Ole Miss. Most people. Not all. It is like comparing the UF job to the Alabama job. Most will take Alabama.
I'm not disagreeing but understand the rosters and situations after the 25 season and Sumrall's familiarity with Ole Miss, the talks were already down the road. But he couldnt' wait any longer. UF wanted an answer and he couldn't wait. I don't think he is unhappy. Just wasn't his first choice.
re: Indiana football
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/23/26 at 12:33 pm to Crusaders6767
quote:
The two at LSU didn't either. Nor played a down in preseason
Yes they did. Wright got a decent signing bonuses.
re: Sumrall really wanted the Auburn job
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/23/26 at 12:14 pm to TROJANFORCEONE
quote:
I wouldn't say he "really" wanted the Auburn job. In all honesty, I think Jon wanted the Alabama job but it wasn't open for him.
He wanted the Ole Miss job. But Lane was dragging his feet on telling Ole Miss because he wanted to coach in the playoffs. Basically by the time Lane told Ole Miss it was too late and JS had taken the UF job.
re: Sumrall really wanted the Auburn job
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/23/26 at 12:12 pm to mckibaj
quote:
Buster Faulkner is on a big rise. Will be interesting to see if he gets a HC job soon. And will be also interesting to see how Florida does without him.
He won at Troy and Tulane. Probably going to get UF to being in the good category in the next few years. I wouldn't bet against him.
re: Indiana football
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/23/26 at 12:03 pm to Crusaders6767
Did either player sign with an NFL team?
the answer is no. Both had major injuries last year and never signed with an NFL team. Huge difference that what LSU tried to do .
the answer is no. Both had major injuries last year and never signed with an NFL team. Huge difference that what LSU tried to do .
re: Anybody else losing interest in football as a sport?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/23/26 at 11:45 am to geauxEdO
Yes it is a house of cards with the price of players going up 40%-50% every year. You can only go to the well so many times before boosters are out. Once complaciency sets in then its really hard to get people excited again. I say this as a fan of 1 of about 5 teams that have improved their stock in the NIL era. (Indiana, Miami, Ole miss, TT and SMU).
Something needs to change but no one knows how to do it. I think the SEC and B1G would like to make conference rules and have them enforceable. That was the whole pro players thing. The SEC trying to prove in court that it can enforce its rules.
Something needs to change but no one knows how to do it. I think the SEC and B1G would like to make conference rules and have them enforceable. That was the whole pro players thing. The SEC trying to prove in court that it can enforce its rules.
re: Can OLE MISS win CG and repeat? if Chambliss gets 7th year TRO
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 2:39 pm to stitchop
Can we ban this guy already?
re: The all in gamble by LSU and the Executive of Louisiana
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 10:31 am to Insurancerebel
quote:
Pete brought in 51 new players this year, and retained the Heisman qb and Rb as well as dozens of others that LSU went after hard. I would say he retained the talent.
Everyone but Chambliss, Alexander, and Lacy were recruited by people that stayed. And when the choice came in the portal they all chose to stay. So they were built by Pete.
The all in gamble by LSU and the Executive of Louisiana
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 9:16 am
Here is the reason LSU can't let Saturday go. They absolutely went all in on Lane. When BK was fired all the decision makers were saying that contracts with huge buyouts were crazy. It was a huge issue and cost them tons of money with Ed O (Just finished paying his buyout a year ago) and just then with BK. Rational human being were rightfully saying "We aren't going to do this again".
But then the NEED to win game up through the fanbase and boosters. The "Cheap" young up and comer hire wasn't good enough. So the decision makers and Governor stepped up to take a gamble.
They saw little ole Ole Miss win the 3rd most games in the country over the last 5 years and said "Lets make a run at that guy. If he did that there, he absolutely will win multiple championships here at LSU. The cost will be worth it. We won't have to worry about the buyout".
So they did. They threw 91 million dollars at Lane. Then when the original budget was 30 million they found the other 20 million for him to overpay to put a competitive roster on the field. Then sold shares to future TV revenue to get another 100 million to get cash flow into the athletic department.
Why do they care about Ole Miss? The who theory the gamble was based on was that the success Ole Miss had was 90% Lane Kiffin. He was the whole reason. If Ole Miss continues to win, that proves that theory false. They are already in for 200 Million + on the hopes this man can win multiple Natties in BR. It can't be Lane isn't a great coach. There has to be a reason Ole Miss didn't fall off the planet.
So yes, Saturday was a big deal for them. They may have misjudged the gamble. Hell the governor bet on him to win re-election. The cracks are starting to show. And everyone else is here for it.
But then the NEED to win game up through the fanbase and boosters. The "Cheap" young up and comer hire wasn't good enough. So the decision makers and Governor stepped up to take a gamble.
They saw little ole Ole Miss win the 3rd most games in the country over the last 5 years and said "Lets make a run at that guy. If he did that there, he absolutely will win multiple championships here at LSU. The cost will be worth it. We won't have to worry about the buyout".
So they did. They threw 91 million dollars at Lane. Then when the original budget was 30 million they found the other 20 million for him to overpay to put a competitive roster on the field. Then sold shares to future TV revenue to get another 100 million to get cash flow into the athletic department.
Why do they care about Ole Miss? The who theory the gamble was based on was that the success Ole Miss had was 90% Lane Kiffin. He was the whole reason. If Ole Miss continues to win, that proves that theory false. They are already in for 200 Million + on the hopes this man can win multiple Natties in BR. It can't be Lane isn't a great coach. There has to be a reason Ole Miss didn't fall off the planet.
So yes, Saturday was a big deal for them. They may have misjudged the gamble. Hell the governor bet on him to win re-election. The cracks are starting to show. And everyone else is here for it.
re: How many of you actually think Ole Miss will be relevant after this year?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 8:49 am to MilkJug
quote:
You are mad he left you for a better job.
Nah brother you have the thickest pair of purple and mustard glasses that have ever existed.
re: Take it
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 8:36 am to pgaddxn
quote:
This will 100% not happen. Tell your friend he’s an idiot.
This is absolutely going to be on Message Board Geniuses by lunch.
re: How many of you actually think Ole Miss will be relevant after this year?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 8:26 am to MilkJug
quote:
How did he try to burn the program down? Wtf are you talking about?
When he was told he couldn't coach the playoffs he gave the staff an ultimatum to get on the plane right now or they won't have a job. Then immediately started tampering with the players who were getting ready to play in the playoffs. Then he told vanity fair that Oxford was racist. There are multiple examples of trying to burn it down.
re: Take it
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 8:21 am to animalcracker
Just like Pavia right?
Yall realize that the NCAA appealed to the Mississippi supreme court that had 3 judges review the case. 1 was a State grade. 1 was a Southern Miss grade. All 3 denied the appeal. Yall are losing your mind. :lol:
So it isn't getting overturned.
Yall realize that the NCAA appealed to the Mississippi supreme court that had 3 judges review the case. 1 was a State grade. 1 was a Southern Miss grade. All 3 denied the appeal. Yall are losing your mind. :lol:
So it isn't getting overturned.
re: How many of you actually think Ole Miss will be relevant after this year?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/22/26 at 8:09 am to MilkJug
re: At What Point Will You Admit You Were Wrong About Pete Golding?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/21/26 at 12:57 pm to theliontamer
quote:
So why, in your opinion, did he leave Ole Miss?
Lane? He viewed LSU in the lens of 2016 and he thought the 5 stars in state come to LSU without much effort. (He is lazy AF at recruiting). He thought he was too big for the Ole Miss job. Now he gets the pressure that comes along with it.
We all thought he had changed. He is a massive manipulator and had everyone fooled. Everyone now sees it but the state of Louisiana. Or they just don't give a shite because he is their piece of shite.
re: At What Point Will You Admit You Were Wrong About Pete Golding?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/21/26 at 12:52 pm to theliontamer
quote:
Lol, riiiiight. Do you guys just hear one guy's buddy say something and then take it for fact? Lots of unverifiable theories being thrown around here as evidence.
It is the truth. Losing PU hurt. We wanted to keep him but his family has a relationship with the pass Rush specialist and that won out.
But Lane absoultely paid out the arse for Dottery. And it has been in the record that Ferellis wanted to commit to OM before Dottery left. PG told him he already had a green dot. When Dottery left he got in touch with Ferelli and that is that.
re: At What Point Will You Admit You Were Wrong About Pete Golding?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/21/26 at 12:45 pm to theliontamer
quote:
So you're telling me that not a single defensive player at ole miss over the past few years was recruited by Lane Kiffin? Why did your 2025 sack leader and tackles leader follow Lane to LSU? Did Pete not want them?
Because Lane paid out the arse for him. Because he was desperate. And Pete had Ferelli ready to go to replace him. We didn't match.
re: Ole Miss and LSU with massive NIL compared to richer states
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/21/26 at 12:41 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
How long can it sustain?
I am surprised big booster willing to spend this much
LSU made it 6 months before they had to sell their TV revenue to sustain it. :lol:
re: At What Point Will You Admit You Were Wrong About Pete Golding?
Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 9/21/26 at 12:40 pm to theliontamer
quote:
The annual war chest is the reason Lane came to LSU. And he will have it every year. Ole Miss will not. They scraped it together for 1 season to keep the party going after the host left town. No irony here, just failure to realize the situation.
Ole Miss has been top 10 nationally for the last 4 years. This isn't 2015 anymore. :lol:
Popular
20
