Started By
Message

re: It’s time to expand Playoffs

Posted on 2/5/21 at 10:24 pm to
Posted by GBJs
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2012
3900 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Time for CFB to join the rest of the sports world in having a strong post season


Is this another way to say “My team hasn’t been able to get over the hump and the one chance ripped our hearts out with 2nd and 26”??? I mean, as an Alabama fan, I’d say the post season is purdy goooddd !!!!!
Posted by Nitro Express
Gulf Coast
Member since Jul 2018
16175 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 10:35 pm to
I'm for it. We need more games verses ranked opponents. This past season gave us a taste of what things could be. I'm cool with a 10 game conference schedule and a 16 team playoff.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32876 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Is this another way to say


No, not at all.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32876 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


Meaningful =/= quality. The problem isn't opt outs, the problem is parity.


When meaningful = many key players not opting out while playing in elimination games, that immediately makes the post season better. Exhibition bowl games dont provide that.

quote:

There is no data backing this up given what we've seen from the playoffs thus far. There have been 14 semi-final games played since 2014. Only three of those have been competitive.


Is it a shock that the gap between #1/2 and the rest can be wide? No.

The gap between 3-12 is likely MUCH smaller. Thats where the good games will come from. As of now, those games dont exist.
Posted by TrendingRight
Mentone
Member since Jul 2017
619 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:00 pm to
MacMan10 - give it up - you're wrong on at least a dozen levels. Way too many big problems with your plan: uncompetitive games, too many games in the first round, extending the season, messing with conferences and their unique culture. There's not enough time in on a Saturday to telecast all the first round games - and extending the first round out to a second week is insane. Apparently you forgot about the NFL. Second round games would all be blowouts and the "upsets" you're touting would "never" happen to the top 2 or 3 teams and to the top 5 about once every 10 years.

The truth is there are only 3 or 4 teams each year that have the talent to win a Championship - and the quality & quantity of talent on the rest of the teams declines too quickly to be competitive. College football fans already know this. In the heat of a Playoff good teams won't come in flat or unmotivated and lose to a nobody. You're dreaming if you think a #16 team could ever win or even be competitive in 3 or 4 round college football Playoff. Basketball is a different sport with far higher outcome variations.

Posted by GBJs
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2012
3900 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

10 game conference schedule


I am absolutely good with tho10 game conference schedule... at least 9 ... that was excellent every weekend.

.......well... except for a couple weekends where folks tried to chicken out.....


I’m JUST KIDDING!!!!!
Posted by GBJs
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2012
3900 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

No, not at all.


It was a joke bro... maybe a shitty one but that’s what I had at the moment
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
24264 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:07 pm to
I can only think of four games that were actually competitive in playoffs and that was Bama OHio state, Bama Washington and Ohio state Clemson since playoffs began.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49156 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:11 pm to
This is true.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19701 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:27 pm to
Shut the frick up
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32876 posts
Posted on 2/5/21 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

There's not enough time in on a Saturday to telecast all the first round games


Of course there is.

quote:

In the heat of a Playoff good teams won't come in flat or unmotivated and lose to a nobody. You're dreaming if you think a #16 team could ever win or even be competitive in 3 or 4 round college football Playoff.


It would be rare, but I dont think this is the point he was making, and its certainly a point I havent made.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Southeast Texas
Member since May 2020
9461 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 12:16 am to
No. I think if you win the SEC you are in 100% of the time. If a team can’t win the sec then they shouldn’t be in the playoff. Expansion will water it down by putting teams like Cincinnati or UCF in it only to have them getting blown out by a Big10 or SEC champ. The G5 might be able to give a pac10 or big12 champ a run for their money in a playoff game.

Don’t reward a team with a chance at the championship if they don’t win their conference. The only exception might be if the team in question lost a nail biter in the conference championship and that’s their only loss.
Posted by TrendingRight
Mentone
Member since Jul 2017
619 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 12:26 am to
quote:

No. I think if you win the SEC you are in 100% of the time. If a team can’t win the sec then they shouldn’t be in the playoff. Expansion will water it down by putting teams like Cincinnati or UCF in it only to have them getting blown out by a Big10 or SEC champ. The G5 might be able to give a pac10 or big12 champ a run for their money in a playoff game.

Don’t reward a team with a chance at the championship if they don’t win their conference. The only exception might be if the team in question lost a nail biter in the conference championship and that’s their only loss.

Agree with most of your post. Lots of losses by elite teams are better than the best wins higher ranked teams have in any given season. A subjective eye must be cast on the elites when they play each other and the penalty for the loss carefully analyzed.

What I don't want to see is two shitty teams play a "good" game because they are both equally unremarkable - or hear the argument that it was a "good game".
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58071 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:16 am to
quote:

frick that. You don’t get to lose a quarter of your regular season games and then call yourself the best team in the country.


It's done that way in every single other level of football.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58071 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:19 am to
quote:

The truth is there are only 3 or 4 teams each year that have the talent to win a Championship - and the quality & quantity of talent on the rest of the teams declines too quickly to be competitive. College football fans already know this. In the heat of a Playoff good teams won't come in flat or unmotivated and lose to a nobody. You're dreaming if you think a #16 team could ever win or even be competitive in 3 or 4 round college football Playoff. Basketball is a different sport with far higher outcome variations.


Talent is becoming too concentrated and a full playoff with all conference winners would do a lot to help spread it back out.

What we have right now is killing the sport. People are sick of Bama, Clemson, Ohio State and team X. The ratings have gone down every single year.

It's much better for CFB for everyone to have a chance to win the title.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32876 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 2:22 am to
quote:

It's done that way in every single other level of football.



Interesting
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15847 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 5:16 am to
Paradoxically, expansion of playoffs would bring 2 loss Bama, Ohio State, Oklahoma,etc into play more often than a "new team" would get in the field.

Maybe they throw a G5 team in the pool, maybe a "new participant" gets in with 1 loss, but I think this would only make it more likely that the "powers" get in every single year.

Probably would get 2 SEC teams in the field most seasons.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65090 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 6:47 am to
quote:

It's done that way in every single other level of football.


In the NFL perhaps. But the NFL was designed from the very beginning with parity in mind. College football, however, was not. Just look at North Dakota State and the FCS. That program has won eight of the last 10 national championships in that sub-division of college football. Northwest Missouri State and Valdosta State dominate in Division II and Mount Union essentially owns Division III.

In high school football, at least in the state of Alabama, the two largest and most cared about classifications are run by a handful of teams. In 7A your state champion will always be either Hoover, Thompson, or Central-Phenix. In 6A, your perennial powers are Pinson Valley, Clay-Chalkville, Opelika, and Spanish Fort.
This post was edited on 2/6/21 at 6:48 am
Posted by MacMan10
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2020
2122 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 7:57 am to
Again, your solution is to have bowl games between like a Florida and Oklahoma where everyone opts out and it is truly meaningless. They weren’t even the same team as in the regular season.

My solution creates more matchups like a uga vs osu, Texas am vs Norte dame, Florida vs Clemson, Florida Oklahoma with zero opt outs. Those would be good games. Yes, the Alabama’s of the world will blow out each team they play. But at least you get other games to watch that are meaningful with NO OPT OUT.
This post was edited on 2/6/21 at 7:59 am
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14155 posts
Posted on 2/6/21 at 8:11 am to
The natives are restless, but why? Well, it's not an indictment about the playoff, it's an indictment about the bowl season. It's a failure in every sense of the word. It will only get worst as time goes by.

So it's coming, but 8 will be the number. This will finally include all the bridesmaids who keep telling themselves they got beat out of their opportunity. Victims of circumstances.

Mostly, it will create a little more excitement among the fan bases and college football needs that.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter