narddogg81

quote:

---

people still can't afford to buy a house.

---

I can

Ukraine has had patriot missile batteries that European countries gave them for over a year

quote:

---

That is a dumb position.

If they are being suppressed, Trump is suppressing them, therefore you can blame Trump.

---

what's actually a dumb position is thinking that the previous admin, the deep state in the doj and the FBI were going to just have that stuff just sitting there where a new admin could get at it. If that sort of material exists it's going to be pulling teeth to track it down

quote:

---

My argument is that if the ncaa is toothless to enforce eligibility based on where/who the money is coming from then I don’t see howthey can enforce arbitrary eligibility dates that limit a students ability to profit off NiL

---

then the referee and umpires in the games are open to being sued for having a monopoly on enforcing the rules of the game. Who's to say you only get 4 downs or have to only have 11 players on the field at once? That's impacting players ability to win the game, which impacts their ability to profit from their nil as winners are more valuable.

I think you are getting it a little twisted, you still have the value of your nil regardless of if you are eligible to play, assuming it actually has any value. The courts are not going to strike down the very concept of a sport having rules or more particularly about college athletics having requirements about who can play, otherwise how do you justify letting some students on the team but not others? Why can one student be on the team just cause he's good at football and another not be. Being on the team is very valuable, and you are impacting that other students ability to make whatever nil deals he/she/they can. And why would it then be limited to students only, etc etc etc?


There is a point where the sport ceases to exist, so hopefully even a group as dense as the federal judiciary see that

quote:

---

Lulz

---

what's the big change that's going to make you guys go from shite to good?

quote:

---

a racoon on meth

---

would be a better mascot for LSU

quote:

---

both 260ish heading into their St year

---

could easily be at 280 by kickoff their freshman year

lol, what nonsense.

quote:

---

Not sure about where the info you are getting about the court designating a third party. You may be correct and please provide a link.

All I have seen is the NCAA no longer wants to get sued or go to court. So, the CSC was created to separate NIL from the NCAA. I have not seen anywhere that was a requirement of the court and even if so, the CSC can only punish the school for violations of NIL not a player.

---

The third party I was referring to is The CSC, and that was created by the district Court ruling as part of the settlement. Third party in that they are not the NCAA and they are not the player/booster making the pay for play deal.


What I've been reading says if the player chooses to go with a deal that falls outside the parameters of approved deals they will have to go through an enforcement process that could impact their eligibility

sports illustrated

There CSC is handling money related stuff and according to this anyway will have the ability to regulate players not just the schools

quote:

---

If a deal is denied within NIL Go, players can either submit a revised deal that falls within certain parameters or they could cancel it altogether. If they still want to move forward with things, there remain two further options: enter an arbitration process which could still approve the deal, or take the money and face the enforcement process.

Should they wind up going through door No. 4, it’s possible the CSC staff could eventually strip them of part of their eligibility to play.

---

So I think what you are saying about the CSC being able to only punish schools is not correct, and I also didn't think it's correct that this only applies to schools that have signed on to this

quote:

---

Soon, it won’t be NCAA enforcement veterans arguing their case against schools before a cadre of faculty athletic reps, lawyers and athletic directors around a set of U-shaped tables. Rather, there will be no hearing at all upon reaching the denouement of a process that is typically measured in years and not months. Instead, perhaps as early as this July, a written notice will simply be sent out to those who have been found to breach some of the new regulations in place. It will bear the logo of the newly formed College Sports Commission overseeing the new process and will rather succinctly inform them of their fate (in an ideal world) just a few weeks after an infraction takes place.

---

quote:

---

The new CSC was only recently incorporated in April and is tasked with oversight, implementation and overall enforcement of the settlement over the course of the next decade. CEO Bryan Seeley, who comes over from Major League Baseball and will assume commissioner-like powers to dole out future punishments, was officially named to his position just two hours after Judge Wilken issued her final approval of the case but technically doesn’t have a set start date prior to July 1 despite inheriting all of the problems at hand right away

---

You gotta be barely conscious to be getting schooled by Sotomayor