Started By
Message

re: If a QB accidentally releases the ball on the forward motion of a pump fake

Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:01 am to
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:01 am to
quote:

If his arm is moving forward it is incomplete.


So we agree?


quote:

If a defensive lineman "accidentally" catches it in the air is it an interception or a fumble recovery?


Interception.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37461 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:01 am to
It was autocorrect you blithering troll.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37461 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:02 am to
His arm is moving forward but not in a throwing motion. Intent matters.
Posted by tenacious
Dallas, Texas
Member since Sep 2003
1961 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:03 am to
He’s past the line of scrimmage, 40 yards down the field. It’s not a pass. It’s a fumble. Same with a guy running a kickoff back, who drops the ball before the goal line. That’s a fumble. This is a dumb discussion. The dude was not trying to complete a forward pass.
Posted by Drydock
Osage County
Member since Oct 2013
6736 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:04 am to
What part of "Beyond the line of Scrimmage" are we missing here?
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:07 am to
quote:

A pump fake implies the motion of throwing it, or at least pretending to throw it.


The player’s intent is irrelevant. Refs consider the objective movements, not what’s inside the brain. A ref can see whether a player voluntary moves the arm forward, whether the player has control of the ball when moving the arm forward, and whether the ball travels forward after release.

A QB’s intention to pump fake can be obvious. Are you saying that a ref has the discretion to call those fumbles because it’s clear the QB was never actually intending to throw a pass when he made that motion?
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:09 am to
quote:

You can't throw a pass beyond the LOS. You can lateral...backwards. If a team throws an illegal forward lateral (not pass, that's behind LOS) and the other team intercepts, it's the same as recovering a fumble. (Like what happened here) If the defense doesn't intercept or recover, and it goes forward, OOB or possessed by the offense, then a penalty for an illegal forward lateral is enforced from the spot of the foul.


So just to be clear, you’re saying that when a QB steps beyond the LOS and throws the ball forward and it hits the ground, it’s a live ball?
Posted by ihateidiots18
Member since Dec 2020
139 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:10 am to
I made my username because of posters like you. Idiot.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30596 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:10 am to
quote:

You’re being purposefully stupid.
He's just trying to fit in around here.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19181 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:10 am to
I believe so until its possessed. If it's possessed by the offense, penalty enforced. If possessed by the defense, change of possession.

I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that's the rule.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:11 am to
quote:

His arm is moving forward but not in a throwing motion.


So shovel passes are fumbles?

quote:

Intent matters.


So a ref can say a QB obviously was just trying to pump fake and not throw the ball and call it a fumble?
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:13 am to
quote:

The dude was not trying to complete a forward pass.


Neither is a QB when he pump fakes.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
85790 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Mizzou RB drops the ball (forward) before any contact is made
how do you know a grasshopper wasn’t on it? Maybe he has entomophobia?

Don’t be a mental health denier!
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:14 am to
quote:

I believe so until its possessed. If it's possessed by the offense, penalty enforced. If possessed by the defense, change of possession.

I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that's the rule.


I’ve watched a frick ton of football and have never seen it called a live ball when the QB throws an incomplete pass after crossing the LOS.
Posted by PurpleandGeauld
Florence, TX
Member since Oct 2013
5171 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:14 am to
Intent to pass would require someone he is attempting to throw to. There is no one ahead of him to throw to.
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
7740 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:15 am to
quote:

So just to be clear, you’re saying that when a QB steps beyond the LOS and throws the ball forward and it hits the ground, it’s a live ball?



This is the only consistent position for the people making that argument.

It may actually be true, if the penalty is decline and the defense recovers the illegal forward pass. Just don't think I've ever seen this.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19181 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:15 am to
quote:

I’ve watched a frick ton of football and have never seen it called a live ball when the QB throws an incomplete pass after crossing the LOS.

Thats cool.

This wasnt a pass, you're just trying to argue.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Intent to pass would require someone he is attempting to throw to. There is no one ahead of him to throw to.


So if a QB is trying to throw the ball away, there is no receiver in the area, but he short arms it and the ball lands in bounds is it a live ball?
Posted by Yewkindewit
Near Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
20022 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:21 am to
Al, the RB had to do was dive into the end zone for the easy TD. Glove could have been just a tad slick for him to lose grip like that. I don’t know. I’m not an Auburn fan and was actually hoping Mizzou would win it. But, it was an interesting finish. Considering the Mizzou missed chip shot, the Auburn FG in OT, and the unique final play in OT, it was definitely entertaining.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:21 am to
Not even close. Using your analogy, why not call it intentional ground? There wasn't even a target near the direction of the fumble. How many time have you seen a player toss the ball in celebration before crossing the end zone and they rule it a fumble?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter