Jon Ham

[quote]I thought for sure there would be a better punchline[/quote] This isn’t a cheap joke. This is 21st century literature....

“Bobby, are you awake, Bobby, can you hear me?” asks Mrs. Petrino in the quiet hospital room. “Huh? What’s this?” Bobby murmurs. “You were in a motorcycle crash, Bobby. You were in a coma for over 12 years. It’s the year 2023 now.” “Are you shittin me?…” “You’re lucky to be alive. One of...

12-0...

[quote]i cant believe Pittman went along with this[/quote] Went along with it? No one can make him do anything except make him leave by paying his buyout and we weren’t doing that....

LETS GOOOOOOO...

[quote]Why only for Alabama year after year?[/quote] I don’t push teams, I push objective, logical evaluations. It just happened that Bama was the beneficiary of my evaluations this year and last. See this thread from 2018 right before the CCG’s where I advocated for Texas if a certain hypoth...

Why do you think Oregon would be deserving over SEC Champ Bama?...

[quote]You seem really hung up on this[/quote] I’m a CFP Rankings Justice Warrior....

[quote]Trying to deep dive into SOS and opponent's strength of record[/quote] Trying to deep dive? It’s super simple and easy: If Bama and Texas win their CCG: Bama: 3 top 15 wins, 1 loss to a one-loss team Texas: 1 top 15 win, 1 loss to a two-loss team [quote]jsut trying to erase and...

A loss to Texas is better than a loss to OU. But the loss to Texas hurts more because it was a loss to the “wrong” team. That’s bull shite. You look at the full resume, and if one is clearly stronger than the other, you give that resume the nod. You don’t go to “head to head tiebreaker” unles...

:lol:...

What’s a worse loss? Losing to Texas or losing to OU?...

[quote]If OU and Texas were both one-loss conference champions, yes, absolutely.[/quote] So the rest of the schedule does matter in how you evaluate the quality of each team. Interesting. But let me guess, you only care about # of wins and losses and not the actual strength of those wins and l...

[quote]magine allowing man made discussions and computers preside over settling things on an actual field.[/quote] In that case put OU over Texas. They settled it on the field didn’t they?...

[quote]Scenario 13: Alabama, Oregon, Florida State and Texas win. 1. Michigan (13-0) 2. Alabama (12-1) 3. Oregon (12-1) 4. Florida State (13-0) — 5. Georgia (12-1) Now, both one-loss Alabama and one-loss Oregon enter the picture. Georgia may claim to be better than Oregon, but Georgia would...

[quote]They should've played each other this season to find out which team was better!!![/quote] Losing to a two-loss team is better than losing to a one-loss team!!!!...

[quote]His rationale when comparing Alabama to Texas is that Alabama will jump to 3 and thus head to head won't be a consideration.[/quote] If Bama and Texas win their CCG: Bama: 3 top 15 wins, 1 loss to a one-loss team Texas: 1 top 15 win, 1 loss to a two-loss team There is no honest deba...

[img]https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19231241/OMFansDieALittle.gif[/img]...

[quote]Really no excuse for a poor OL under his watch.[/quote] When we hired him, we thought “no matter who the OC Is, we will have a good offensive line and therefore the offense should be productive.” If offensive line is bad, there’s no justification for having Pittman as head coach....

[quote]If the commitment by the powers that be is to operate on the cheap then they will get what they pay for no matter the coach. If sam is given the resources to compete with the other teams for players and money to get a good OC then he has proven he can win. I’m going to be optimistic becaus...