Started By
Message

re: If a QB accidentally releases the ball on the forward motion of a pump fake

Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
7740 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

That’s a clearly intentional overhand throw to an open receiver


Over hand vs under hand has nothing to do with whether a play meets the definition of a pass

Nor does a receiver in the area
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 1:21 pm
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American dissident
Member since Nov 2013
35839 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:25 pm to
quote:


If a QB accidentally releases the ball on the forward motion of a pump fake
Usually it is clear in the replay because if the QB drops the ball his mannerisms scream “oh shite”, and he goes after the ball. On a “pass” he doesn’t






find that in the rule book

you're making shite up


Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10144 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Harry Rex Vonner

Hey Harry,

You made some thread towards chicken saying he need to open tRant up on the scoreboard and proceeded to post nothing.

What’s the deal? Chicken gunna frick you up.
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American dissident
Member since Nov 2013
35839 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Hey Harry,

You made some thread towards chicken saying he need to open tRant up on the scoreboard and proceeded to post nothing.

What’s the deal? Chicken gunna frick you up.



Chicken loves me

Anytime I openly post towards Chicken, he sends me $10 Sonic Gift Cards in which I go to Sonic and get the double cheeseburger meal and end up owing like a dollar and 34 cents difference on my visa

sometimes I've got the dollar 34 in my drink cup holder


I always text chicken on that on my way out of Sonice and he sends me all the nice emojis
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

QB is running downfield and accidentally flips the ball forward, is a fumble.


This is a strange take. You’re saying an official can determine a ball is “live” after a QB throws it forward if the official thinks the QB didn’t mean to do that.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9298 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

quote:

That’s a clearly intentional overhand throw to an open receiver
Over hand vs under hand has nothing to do with whether a play meets the definition of a pass

Nor does a receiver in the area

What about “intentional”?
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
7740 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:35 pm to
Intentional forward movement of the arm matters per the rule book. Nothing about intent to complete a pass
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22592 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:36 pm to
quote:


What about “intentional”?


You realize these guys don't give a frick what the rules really are right? They've realized Arkansas still sucks, so they are back to shite posting because it's all they have.

Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26956 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Explain why it’s a fumble then.

What in my analysis was incorrect besides the conclusion?


Because you literally have to be a fricking refugee from Outer Mongolia who's never seen a football before to conclude that the running back was trying to throw the ball. Sticking a hand straight out doesn't even remotely resemble a throwing motion.

Don't take offense, but this really is a serious question: are you really this fricking stupid in real life? Lots of posters have their message board persona which in no way resembles their real life persona.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9298 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

This is a strange take. You’re saying an official can determine a ball is “live” after a QB throws it forward if the official thinks the QB didn’t mean to do that.

I would argue that the word “throw” in itself implies intentionality, but yes that’s exactly what I’m saying - that an official can rule on whether a pass was intentionally thrown or accidentally lost by a QB when that QB is past the line of scrimmage.

When it happens behind the LOS it is presumed to be intentional (e.g. not a fumble).

Just like fumbling out of bounds is OK but intentionally fumbling out of bounds to conserve clock is a penalty.
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
7740 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:38 pm to
I do care about the rules. The other side is the one claiming it’s up to the judgement of the officials, which is probably true, but it should be clarified in the rulebook
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9298 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Intentional forward movement of the arm matters per the rule book. Nothing about intent to complete a pass

I realize you’re just trolling about the lack of clarity in the written rules, but you’re still wrong.

Intentional forward movement of the arm only matters, per the rule book:
quote:

when a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward toward the neutral zone

So not only does it only apply when the player is behind the line of scrimmage, it also technically only applies when the player is holding the ball to pass it forward (i.e. is trying to pass - intentionality).
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American dissident
Member since Nov 2013
35839 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Because you literally have to be a fricking refugee from Outer Mongolia who's never seen a football before to conclude that the running back was trying to throw the ball. Sticking a hand straight out doesn't even remotely resemble a throwing motion.

Don't take offense, but this really is a serious question: are you really this fricking stupid in real life? Lots of posters have their message board persona which in no way resembles their real life persona.




you dumbshit


what is a quarterback and what is a running back? If we snap it to Rocket and he hands it or tosses it to KJ, who is the "quarterback"?


YOU DONT KNOW!
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American dissident
Member since Nov 2013
35839 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:55 pm to
nobody read that
Posted by The Sultan of Swine
Member since Nov 2010
7740 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:02 pm to
You might have a point but there’s nothing explicit about redefining what constitutes an (illegal) forward pass beyond the line of scrimmage. So the simplest assumption would be to use the definition that applies behind the line of scrimmage (minus the part about the arm moving toward the neutral zone)
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:08 pm to
The rule you’re referring to:

quote:

b. When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward toward the neutral zone, any intentional forward movement of the passer’s hand with the ball firmly in their control starts the forward pass unless the player clearly starts to bring the ball back with firm control to the passer’s body.


The whole point of including “toward the neutral zone” is to define what “forward” means, not to insert a requirement that in order to attempt a forward pass you have to be behind the neutral zone. If that were a requirement, then there could be no illegal forward passes, it would just be fumbles.

Just because this rule specifically explains what a forward pass is in the context of a player throwing from behind the LOS, it doesn’t negate what a forward pass is when the player is beyond the LOS.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59603 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:09 pm to
Dude just go play farmville
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:21 pm to
7 pages and at best this is an undetermined issue. I think my position makes the most sense in content of applying the rules as literally and objectively as possible. It seems the strongest argument in the other side is “officials just know what is a pass and what is a fumble and have the discretion to make that call.”
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30858 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:24 pm to
I watched the replay, and it's definitely a fumble.

By your logic, literally ANY time a RB tries to reach out to gain yardage and fumbles, it's an illegal forward pass.

I say this because that's what he's doing in the clip - he's changing hands so that he can reach out and break the plane.

First, we define a fumble:

quote:

Fumble
ARTICLE 1. To fumble the ball is to lose player possession by any act other than passing, kicking or successful handing (A.R. 2-19-2-I and A.R. 4-1-3-I).
The status of the ball is a fumble


We can rule out kicking and handing, so it's "passing":

quote:

Forward and Backward Pass
ARTICLE 2. a. A pass is forward if the ball first strikes the ground, a player,
an official or anything else beyond the spot where the ball is released. All other
passes are backward passes. When in question a pass thrown in or behind the neutral zone is forward rather than a backward pass.(Exception: Games using Instant Replay)
b. When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward toward the neutral zone, any intentional forward movement of the passer’s hand with the ball firmly in their control starts the forward pass unless the player
clearly starts to bring the ball back with firm control to the passer’s body



Relevant content from A.R. 2-19-2-I:
When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward toward the neutral zone, any intentional forward movement of his hand or arm with the ball firmly in his control starts the forward pass.


In other words, INTENT is a very strong component.
It's very clear his intent isn't to try and pass the ball to the mascot sitting outside of the end zone. He was trying to switch hands to reach for the TD and win the game instead of controlling the ball and letting himself be knocked OOB with snaps left to try and win.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28558 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Sticking a hand straight out doesn't even remotely resemble a throwing motion.


It was just like a shovel pass, a bad shovel pass, but the motion was the same.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter