Started By
Message

re: Blue Blood Index 4.0

Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:11 am to
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2478 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:11 am to
What, no mizzou in top 40? But they won a co-conference championship only 57 years ago
Posted by Demosthenian
Zetto, Granite Bowl, & points btwn
Member since Sep 2021
959 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:32 am to
How would Clemson play twice?
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41445 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:00 am to
Fixed it


Thank you



Alabama
Clemson

ND
Miami

USC
PSU

Texas
LSU



Georgia
Nebraska

Michigan
FSU

OU
UF

OSU
Tennessee





Honestly,

That’s too many teams.


8 is perfect.
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 11:01 am
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
62486 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:03 am to
quote:

FSU is stretching it, but definitely not Penn State


I am a pretty old, so I remember some of the powerful teams and how they dominated particular eras. But, Penn State has 2 National Championships and FSU has three. Both were dominant for long stretches of time, and one could argue that FSU has been more relevant more recently than Penn State.

The media tends to give more credit for the older powers and vote them higher in pre-season polls and keep them higher longer after losses. See: USCw, Penn State, ND, Texas, Alabama (although I could argue Alabama deserves it to this point) FSU, Ohio State, Michigan and several others.
Posted by JeffLebowski
Member since Feb 2015
2850 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:13 am to
I thought Gaggies only looked at the BBC index?…
Posted by EV
Member since Aug 2024
580 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:21 am to
Nebraska and Texas are in Tier 1: The OG Bluebloods

Georgia through Auburn is Tier 2: The New Bloods

Pitt might slip into Tier 2...

There are no other tiers
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2478 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 12:00 pm to
OU also played two blue bloods each year
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35834 posts
Posted on 8/22/26 at 12:07 pm to
3 natties gets you into tier II and 9 natties is tier III, got it
Posted by Smokin Joe Dumas
Armchair QB
Member since Apr 2022
2415 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

literally


Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17424 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:09 am to
No integration until 1969 for the Crimson Tide. Number 1 is not only amazing but dam close to a miracle.
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
33243 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:08 am to
Here’s how he ranked them by era’s

Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
24427 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:14 am to
quote:

9 natties


Posted by halfadolla50
Member since Oct 2015
577 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:18 am to
Honestly it’s Alabama and Ohio State.

Those two are in a league by themselves when you take everything into account
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13223 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:21 am to
Neither played in the championship game…

There is more parity now
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35944 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

I guess you are getting downvoted by those people who insist that OU would be at the level of Mississippi State if they had been in the SEC this whole time.

Funny thing is they might be right. Being in the Big 7/8 is the only reason that OU was able to integrate the team in 1956 instead of 1970. The fact that OU got a head start on integrating their program... and that was a huge part of why they were so good in the 1970s.


Or maybe the focus was on OG SEC?
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted by PurpleandGeauld
Florence, TX
Member since Oct 2013
5534 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:11 pm to
It is easy to argue with them, certainly the tier lines. The last time A&M won a Natty, the Japanese had not even bombed Pearl Harbor yet, and is in the same tier as teams like LSU, Miami, Florida, Clemson, and Auburn. Points for "sleeping giant," "printed cups," and empty trophy cases in your "Hall of Champions" aren't really points.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5721 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

UGA is 22.5 points behind Bama and 2 points above LSU.

Thats hardly a “tier” above.



The concept of a blue blood is subjective. Tiers are subjective too, they're divisions based on someone's preferred criteria. In this case the tiers seem to be based on 15 point ranges. 100 to 85, 85 to 70, 70 to 55, etc. The bottom tier of the top 40 (also a subjective range) seems to have been extended to avoid putting Oregon State in a tier by itself.
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted by RTRnFlorida
Member since Mar 2024
3325 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 4:15 pm to
Honestly.. the list overall is pretty accurate with a few exceptions.

Texas needs to be lower. I hate LSU, but they’re more of a blue blood than them. One title in 50 years means you’re not Tier 2. You’re average at best.

Secondly, WTF is Texas A&M doing even in the list?!!!
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38735 posts
Posted on 8/23/26 at 4:17 pm to
Seems pretty arbitrary to count 1998-2013 as less than a pre bcs title
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter