Started By
Message
re: Blue Blood Index 4.0
Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:11 am to Projectpat
Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:11 am to Projectpat
What, no mizzou in top 40? But they won a co-conference championship only 57 years ago
Posted on 8/22/26 at 10:32 am to dstone12
How would Clemson play twice?
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:00 am to Demosthenian
Fixed it
Thank you
Alabama
Clemson
ND
Miami
USC
PSU
Texas
LSU
Georgia
Nebraska
Michigan
FSU
OU
UF
OSU
Tennessee
Honestly,
That’s too many teams.
8 is perfect.
Thank you
Alabama
Clemson
ND
Miami
USC
PSU
Texas
LSU
Georgia
Nebraska
Michigan
FSU
OU
UF
OSU
Tennessee
Honestly,
That’s too many teams.
8 is perfect.
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 11:01 am
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:03 am to Tiger Live2
quote:
FSU is stretching it, but definitely not Penn State
I am a pretty old, so I remember some of the powerful teams and how they dominated particular eras. But, Penn State has 2 National Championships and FSU has three. Both were dominant for long stretches of time, and one could argue that FSU has been more relevant more recently than Penn State.
The media tends to give more credit for the older powers and vote them higher in pre-season polls and keep them higher longer after losses. See: USCw, Penn State, ND, Texas, Alabama (although I could argue Alabama deserves it to this point) FSU, Ohio State, Michigan and several others.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:13 am to Projectpat
I thought Gaggies only looked at the BBC index?…
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:21 am to Projectpat
Nebraska and Texas are in Tier 1: The OG Bluebloods
Georgia through Auburn is Tier 2: The New Bloods
Pitt might slip into Tier 2...
There are no other tiers
Georgia through Auburn is Tier 2: The New Bloods
Pitt might slip into Tier 2...
There are no other tiers
Posted on 8/22/26 at 12:00 pm to Gunga Din
OU also played two blue bloods each year
Posted on 8/22/26 at 12:07 pm to Projectpat
3 natties gets you into tier II and 9 natties is tier III, got it
Posted on 8/23/26 at 10:09 am to Projectpat
No integration until 1969 for the Crimson Tide. Number 1 is not only amazing but dam close to a miracle.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:08 am to Projectpat
Here’s how he ranked them by era’s

Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:18 am to Projectpat
Honestly it’s Alabama and Ohio State.
Those two are in a league by themselves when you take everything into account
Those two are in a league by themselves when you take everything into account
Posted on 8/23/26 at 11:21 am to halfadolla50
Neither played in the championship game…
There is more parity now
There is more parity now
Posted on 8/23/26 at 12:54 pm to Gunga Din
quote:
I guess you are getting downvoted by those people who insist that OU would be at the level of Mississippi State if they had been in the SEC this whole time.
Funny thing is they might be right. Being in the Big 7/8 is the only reason that OU was able to integrate the team in 1956 instead of 1970. The fact that OU got a head start on integrating their program... and that was a huge part of why they were so good in the 1970s.
Or maybe the focus was on OG SEC?
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:11 pm to Projectpat
It is easy to argue with them, certainly the tier lines. The last time A&M won a Natty, the Japanese had not even bombed Pearl Harbor yet, and is in the same tier as teams like LSU, Miami, Florida, Clemson, and Auburn. Points for "sleeping giant," "printed cups," and empty trophy cases in your "Hall of Champions" aren't really points.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:14 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
UGA is 22.5 points behind Bama and 2 points above LSU.
Thats hardly a “tier” above.
The concept of a blue blood is subjective. Tiers are subjective too, they're divisions based on someone's preferred criteria. In this case the tiers seem to be based on 15 point ranges. 100 to 85, 85 to 70, 70 to 55, etc. The bottom tier of the top 40 (also a subjective range) seems to have been extended to avoid putting Oregon State in a tier by itself.
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 8/23/26 at 4:15 pm to Projectpat
Honestly.. the list overall is pretty accurate with a few exceptions.
Texas needs to be lower. I hate LSU, but they’re more of a blue blood than them. One title in 50 years means you’re not Tier 2. You’re average at best.
Secondly, WTF is Texas A&M doing even in the list?!!!
Texas needs to be lower. I hate LSU, but they’re more of a blue blood than them. One title in 50 years means you’re not Tier 2. You’re average at best.
Secondly, WTF is Texas A&M doing even in the list?!!!
Posted on 8/23/26 at 4:17 pm to Projectpat
Seems pretty arbitrary to count 1998-2013 as less than a pre bcs title
Popular
Back to top

0













