
Started By
Message

Blue Blood Index 4.0
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:42 pm to Projectpat
GAF index 5.0 says otherwise.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:51 pm to Projectpat
SEC, according to assigned "classes"...
Tier 1
Alabama
Tier 2
Georgia
Tier 3
LSU
Florida
Tennessee
Auburn
…I'll take it!!!
Tier 1
Alabama
Tier 2
Georgia
Tier 3
LSU
Florida
Tennessee
Auburn
…I'll take it!!!
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:56 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
SEC, according to assigned "classes"...
Tier 1
Alabama
Oklahoma
Tier 2
Georgia
Tier 3
LSU
Florida
Tennessee
Auburn
…I'll take it!!!
FIFY
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:56 pm to Projectpat
This is good work. I honestly can't find much to argue with.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 2:56 pm to Projectpat
Michigan ahead of USC is just lol
Posted on 8/21/26 at 3:00 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
UGA is 22.5 points behind Bama and 2 points above LSU.
Thats hardly a “tier” above.
Is this graphic saying the tabulation started with 1970 season? Have never seen that year used as a starting point.
Thats hardly a “tier” above.
Is this graphic saying the tabulation started with 1970 season? Have never seen that year used as a starting point.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 3:08 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Michigan ahead of USC is just lol
Nah. Michigan has been way more consistent over the years IMO
Michigan has spent 944 weeks ranked in the AP Poll (#2 all time) while USC is at just 831 (#6 all time). That's a very wide gap.
Final AP Poll results:
Top 25 finishes: Michigan 65, USC 52
Top 10 finishes: Michigan 41, USC 29
Top 5 finishes: USC 19, Michigan 18
It's true USC has more titles, but Michigan's consistency puts them ahead in my mind.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 3:13 pm to Projectpat
I think they are ignoring some of Auburn’s National Championships!
Posted on 8/21/26 at 3:14 pm to Projectpat
most AI clickbait bulslhti like the OP is garbage but I will give the person who put it together for the following:
-not having michican as high as many other media outlets. When there's only like a half dozen football programs for 20 years it's easy to rack up a high win count. They also have an astounding lack of national titles over the last 75 years
-having UGA in the top 10
-having UGA and LSU neck and neck, as they shoudl be, with UGA having a slight edge
-Tennessee dropping way down as they should
-not having michican as high as many other media outlets. When there's only like a half dozen football programs for 20 years it's easy to rack up a high win count. They also have an astounding lack of national titles over the last 75 years
-having UGA in the top 10
-having UGA and LSU neck and neck, as they shoudl be, with UGA having a slight edge
-Tennessee dropping way down as they should
Posted on 8/21/26 at 3:17 pm to AUTiger789
quote:
This is good work. I honestly can't find much to argue with.
The ranking is fine but the tiers are annoying.
LSU has 3 of the last 25 national championships. aTm has 0 in 75+ years.
We are listed in the same “tier” as Aggie but a tier below UGA. Meanwhile we are 2pts behind UGA yet 15pts above aTm. This was put together with bias.
This post was edited on 8/22/26 at 7:10 am
Posted on 8/21/26 at 3:37 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
Is this graphic saying the tabulation started with 1970 season? Have never seen that year used as a starting point.
Do you even Unix epoch time, bro?
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:00 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
having UGA and LSU neck and neck, as they shoudl be, with UGA having a slight edge
I agree UGA should be slightly higher, but do think they should be same tier.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:18 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
The ranking is fine but the tiers are annoying.
LSU has 3 of the last 25 national championships. aTm has 0 in 75+ years.
We are in the same “tier” at aTm and a tier below UGA. Meanwhile we are 2pts behind UGA and 15ptd above aTm.
Contrary to LSU Dumb Dumb Think, football did not start when Saban arrived at LSU and got things back on track for LSU and those coaches that followed.
From '58, LSU's first NC, until Saban arrived in 2001, LSU averaged 7 wins a season. LSU was literally a Mississippi State type team for 43 years.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:33 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Tier 1
Alabama
Oklahoma
I guess you are getting downvoted by those people who insist that OU would be at the level of Mississippi State if they had been in the SEC this whole time.
Funny thing is they might be right. Being in the Big 7/8 is the only reason that OU was able to integrate the team in 1956 instead of 1970. The fact that OU got a head start on integrating their program... and that was a huge part of why they were so good in the 1970s.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 5:37 pm to WG_Dawg
this reminds me that next year is stewart mandels kings and barons.that only comes out every 5 years.
Unless LSU makes the playoffs, i will be nervous if LSU remains one of the 13 kings.
Unless LSU makes the playoffs, i will be nervous if LSU remains one of the 13 kings.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:03 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
UGA is 22.5 points behind Bama and 2 points above LSU.
Thats hardly a “tier” above.
NOT my methodology. NOT my rankings.
Why much so many LSU fans be so hypersensitive
Posted on 8/21/26 at 6:08 pm to clamdip
quote:
Do you even Unix epoch time, bro?
I understood the reference

Popular
Back to top

27










