Started By
Message
Further proof that Sankey is a fraud who is hurting the SEC
Posted on 2/25/26 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 7:33 pm to AHM21
The playoff committee needs to come out this year strongly endorsing P4 matchups by not considering G5 games at all. If you’re 10-2 w 3 G5 wins your 7-2 in the eyes of the committee.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 7:35 pm to ukraine_rebel
The die is cast. Snakey is a clown
Posted on 2/25/26 at 7:47 pm to ColoradoAg
We learned that with Leo Lewis.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 7:50 pm to ukraine_rebel
quote:
The playoff committee needs to come out this year strongly endorsing P4 matchups by not considering G5 games at all.
I would love this but they would first need to create a G5 playoff and a G5 champion. I'm all for that as well.
This post was edited on 2/25/26 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 8:02 pm to AHM21
Stankey talks a big game, but lets the B1G run circles around him.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 8:06 pm to AHM21
I don't want more games against Louisiana-Monroe. If it costs us a playoff spot, then tough shite, we weren't good enough.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 8:40 pm to Landmass
quote:
I would love this but they would first need to create a G5 playoff and a G5 champion. I'm all for that as well.
Sure everyone says they're for it, but no one will actually watch it which is why you don't have one. Instead you will get a 24 team playoff.
Go look at the Neilson ratings for G5 matchups and compare it to P4. Not in the same stratosphere.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 8:58 pm to tBrand
quote:
I don't want more games against Louisiana-Monroe. If it costs us a playoff spot, then tough shite, we weren't good enough.
Agreed. Dog shite games are dog shite. And I agree the committee should discount non-P4 games.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 9:56 pm to AHM21
quote:
Further proof that Sankey is a fraud who is hurting the SEC
I know, it's great right?
Posted on 2/25/26 at 10:40 pm to AHM21
I’ll never forgive Sankey for moving us away from CBS.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:31 am to AHM21
I couldn't care less about a win over SC St. vs a loss against UNC. The win sucks and the loss sucks in that scenario. I would rather go watch power 4 vs power 4 games. I am not interested in low level games. It's like going into a high-level restaurant and them serving you a McDonalds burger and fries. No thanks.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:47 am to ukraine_rebel
They should….but they won’t. It’s about W-L to make the playoffs and until the committee has an actual formula that’s transparent (and not just bs statements they don’t stick to anyways) teams are going to scheduled nobody games to pass their record
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:05 am to AHM21
quote:
Further proof that Sankey is a fraud
I didn't need any more proof. The media contract; the delay in the scheduling decisions; his temperament; presentation. If that fricker ever smiles his face will crack.
Petitti consistently makes Sankey look like a rube.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:36 am to AHM21
Sankey is a dumbfrick, but I like the new schedule rules. It helps with schedule parity and reduces the chances of schools having an easy ride to the CCG
The B1G needs to adopt the OOC rule, but I also wouldn’t use USCw as the example of that. They played 11 P4 in 2024, and the reason they canceled with the gold domers is because ND wanted to play that game late season (during conference play for USC) and ND has that new clause that automatically puts them in the playoffs. Miami would have been left out for ND under the new rules despite having the H2H
The B1G needs to adopt the OOC rule, but I also wouldn’t use USCw as the example of that. They played 11 P4 in 2024, and the reason they canceled with the gold domers is because ND wanted to play that game late season (during conference play for USC) and ND has that new clause that automatically puts them in the playoffs. Miami would have been left out for ND under the new rules despite having the H2H
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:55 am to AHM21
Your regression is due to Saban retiring. It has nothing to do with you now having to play 10 power 4 games.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 10:52 am to AHM21
How about this...change the calculation in the FBS Playoff Calculator where non-P4 wins are fractional (like 0.5 wins or 0.75).
How about:
P4 Wins = 1
Non-P4 FBS wins = 0.75 win equivalents
Non-P4 FBS losses = 1.25 loss equivalents
FCS wins = 0.50 win equivalents
FCS losses = 1.5 loss equivalents
So...for 2025 the final top 5 teams' records (after the playoffs) would be:
1. Indiana - 15-0 (0.75 each for ODU and KSU; 0.5 for Ind. St)
2. Miami - 12.5-3 (0.5 for Bethune-Cookman)
3. Ole Miss - 10.25-2 (0.75 for Georgia St. & Tulane (x2), 0.5 for The Citadel)
4. Oregon - 11-2 (Montana St. 0.5, JMU 0.5)
5. Ohio St. - 10-2 (Grambling 0.5, Ohio 0.5)
So, for their regular season calculations they actually would have been:
IU - 12-0
Miami - 9.5-2
Ole Miss - 7.75-1
Oregon - 9.5-1
Ohio St. - 10-1
Other "Playoff Teams" before playoff brackets were chosen:
Tulane - 5.25-1
UGA 10-5-1
Texas Tech - 11.25-1
Oklahoma - 9.25-2
Bama - 8.25-3
James Madison - 8.25-1
aTm - 10-1
Excluded teams before playoff brackets were chosen:
Notre Dame - 7.5-2
BYU - 9-2
Vandy - 9-2
How about:
P4 Wins = 1
Non-P4 FBS wins = 0.75 win equivalents
Non-P4 FBS losses = 1.25 loss equivalents
FCS wins = 0.50 win equivalents
FCS losses = 1.5 loss equivalents
So...for 2025 the final top 5 teams' records (after the playoffs) would be:
1. Indiana - 15-0 (0.75 each for ODU and KSU; 0.5 for Ind. St)
2. Miami - 12.5-3 (0.5 for Bethune-Cookman)
3. Ole Miss - 10.25-2 (0.75 for Georgia St. & Tulane (x2), 0.5 for The Citadel)
4. Oregon - 11-2 (Montana St. 0.5, JMU 0.5)
5. Ohio St. - 10-2 (Grambling 0.5, Ohio 0.5)
So, for their regular season calculations they actually would have been:
IU - 12-0
Miami - 9.5-2
Ole Miss - 7.75-1
Oregon - 9.5-1
Ohio St. - 10-1
Other "Playoff Teams" before playoff brackets were chosen:
Tulane - 5.25-1
UGA 10-5-1
Texas Tech - 11.25-1
Oklahoma - 9.25-2
Bama - 8.25-3
James Madison - 8.25-1
aTm - 10-1
Excluded teams before playoff brackets were chosen:
Notre Dame - 7.5-2
BYU - 9-2
Vandy - 9-2
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:08 am to koreandawg
quote:
Your regression is due to Saban retiring
Now that's interesting....
Posted on 2/26/26 at 12:08 pm to AHM21
The SEC could just win that power 4 OOC game……..
Posted on 2/26/26 at 12:21 pm to tBrand
quote:
I don't want more games against Louisiana-Monroe. If it costs us a playoff spot, then tough shite, we weren't good enough.
The problem, though, is Sankey got clowned into the SEC being at a competitive disadvantage to our biggest competitor, the Big 10, and didn't even get us more money from the networks for the change. That's just bad leadership on his part regardless of whether you like playing more games against better competition as a fan. That's his primary responsibility as commissioner of the league, and he's failed
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 12:24 pm
Popular
Back to top


12









