Started By
Message
Who is the better hire? DeBoer or Kelly?
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:45 am
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:45 am
Kelly wins the West his first year. DeBoer takes Washington to the championship his second year.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:46 am to Buster83
Elko is better than both.. am I right or am I right?
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:46 am to Buster83
Well one of them has yet to coach a game with his current team so
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:47 am to Buster83
Alabama hire has yet to do just about anything so it is impossible to rate them at this time.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:48 am to Buster83
Welcome to the SEC. WE have a place over there for you to sit.
It's right over there next to to that pig trough and the kids table.
It's right over there next to to that pig trough and the kids table.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:49 am to Buster83
DeBoer appeared in the championship in his second season at the P5 level.
Kelly did it in his third.
At LSU, Kelly took over a 6-6 team and went 9-3.
By that metric, DeBoer has to probably go 12-0.
Kelly did it in his third.
At LSU, Kelly took over a 6-6 team and went 9-3.
By that metric, DeBoer has to probably go 12-0.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:50 am to Buster83
Interestingly, DeBoer’s resume is almost identical to Kelly’s when he got the ND job.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:51 am to Buster83
quote:
Kelly wins the West his first year. DeBoer takes Washington to the championship his second year.
Kelly also took Notre Dame to the NC.
Both are good hires. Kelly is the better one on paper. DeBoer might have more upside, but he’s a bigger risk.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:51 am to Buster83
DeBoer is 10-1 vs top 25
Kelly is 34-34 vs top 25
Kelly is 34-34 vs top 25
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:52 am to Buster83
Does it piss you off that Bama went and got a coach who was just in the National championship, while A&M got a basketball school coach?
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:54 am to Buster83
The only thing I like about DeBoer more than Kelly is the age. He is much younger and if he does pan out as a very good coach Bama could realistically keep him much longer than we would be able to keep Kelly. Other than that I think Kelly is the better hire.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 10:58 am to Buster83
Considering one hasn't coached a game as an SEC HC, I'd say it is too early to make that call.
But this thread will still get to 4+ pages.
But this thread will still get to 4+ pages.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 11:16 am to Buster83
Surely you can’t be dumb enough to believe PAC coaching success equals or exceeds SEC success.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 11:20 am to Buster83
How about we let Deboer have a couple of seasons in the SEC before we make comparisons?
Posted on 1/14/24 at 12:36 pm to Buster83
DeBoer, Kelly is 63 and now the old man of the SEC.
Kelly doesn’t even look healthy.
Kelly doesn’t even look healthy.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 12:41 pm to Buster83
Surprise surprise. I know our fans troll you guys to no end, but these threads never end well for you guys.
Elko
Elko
Posted on 1/14/24 at 1:04 pm to Buster83
From this morning Should Bama have hired Kelly
Posted on 1/14/24 at 1:17 pm to Buster83
Serious non trolling answer? I thought Kelly was a hell of a hire for LSU. I’m excited about DeBoer.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 2:12 pm to Buster83
Too early to call. I am okay with DeB, would not want Kelly.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News