Started By
Message

Blame the bottom dwellers for the 8 game schedule

Posted on 5/30/23 at 8:24 am
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
28018 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 8:24 am
It's not just the money, apparently the bottom dwellers (Mizzou, Vandy, South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky) are voting against a 9 game because they don't want to give away an easy non-conference W to get to 6 wins.

What a joke.
Posted by Arkapigdiesel
Arkansas
Member since Jun 2009
13483 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 8:25 am to
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25999 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Blame the bottom dwellers

It sounds like you are calling 1/3 of the SEC an easy win.

Kind of ironic.
Posted by swinetime
Member since Apr 2013
4516 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 8:31 am to
OR... hang with me here. We understand financial issues better than some broke arse schools (not mentioning any names) And realize you are going to lose home games in that scenario. This may seem wierd but making less money over a 10 year period is not ideal if you can make more. And dont come at me with the tv contract because we gonna get that regardless.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37734 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:08 am to
I actually think it’s that ESPN has us by the balls and won’t pay any more. You tack on 12% more money to each school and even the bottom dwellers would sign on.

I also think it’s Alabama’s fault too because all of a sudden playing their two rivals plus LSU every year is just unfair.
Posted by financetiger38
Member since Nov 2022
3182 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:09 am to
Can you really blame them? All of those schools struggle to make bowl games so they aren’t going to voluntarily play an extra SEC game.
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:09 am to
SEC is socialist confirmed
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:10 am to
The shite eaters like Arkansas are ruining this conference.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51518 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:11 am to
quote:

South Carolina


quote:

give away an easy non-conference


What?
Posted by kczoutiger
Member since Jul 2016
773 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:22 am to
Everything I have read has Mizzou in favor of a 9 game schedule, no idea what you are spewing.
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25726 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 9:35 am to
Blame the hypocritical coward Saban.
Posted by gamecockman12
Columbia, SC
Member since Aug 2012
6109 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:02 am to
SC has North Carolina and Clemson this year and you want to add a 9 game SEC schedule on top of that? Until every SEC team has a similar schedule set-up you'll always get teams that don't think it's a fair split.
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
20246 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:14 am to
The more teams we get in bowls the more money we all get to split. But I don’t care one way or another.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9538 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:33 am to
quote:

It's not just the money, apparently the bottom dwellers (Mizzou, Vandy, South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky) are voting against a 9 game because they don't want to give away an easy non-conference W to get to 6 wins.

What a joke.


Mizzou is very publicly in favor of nine-games. In fact, here's Coach Drink on the matter today:

quote:

“I think commissioner Sankey makes a good point, we’d be the only Power 5 conference with an eight-game schedule. I don’t think that’s a good look for our conference.”

LINK
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
29734 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:34 am to
Who cares if you go 8-4 instead of 7-5 with the difference being an actual good team instead of drumming Mercer for the 8th win

They wonder why attendance is down, bc it’s expensive as frick to go to games and no I’m not sitting in a 300 degree stadium in early September to watch us play a scrub team.

Gotta make it worthwhile for the fans to show up


This post was edited on 5/30/23 at 10:36 am
Posted by BurgTiger
Member since Feb 2014
2779 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:48 am to
Objective proof Mizzou is not a bottom dweller. We ain’t scared! We are a middle class program always have been. Always will be. Suck it.
Posted by Drydock
Osage County
Member since Oct 2013
6808 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 10:56 am to
It's more likely the upper tier does not want to give up that late season cupcake.
Posted by LeadingTiger
In the walls of tiger stadium
Member since Aug 2022
746 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:04 am to
What are you smoking I get a few of those but sc and Arkansas are on a upward trend
Posted by morriscat2
tennessee
Member since Jun 2012
1944 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:29 am to
Who made you Judge, Jury and Executioner?
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33185 posts
Posted on 5/30/23 at 11:49 am to
quote:

It's not just the money, apparently the bottom dwellers (Mizzou, Vandy, South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky) are voting against a 9 game


Bama isn’t bottom dwelling
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter