Started By
Message

re: The agreement Demond Williams signed with Washington included a provision. Uh oh, LSU.

Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:36 pm to
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3764 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:36 pm to
How many coaches have signed contracts with their current school when they bolt for a better job ? All of them. Treating a player differently won’t fly.
Posted by jiffyjohnson
1226 miles from Death Valley
Member since Nov 2011
5777 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Hold him accountable of a signed contract.


dozens of coaches break their contracts every year in this sport.

its actually a pivotal part of the game that it happens.

w/o contract breakers the coaching changes board wouldnt even be a thing.


Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
43926 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

dozens of coaches break their contracts every year in this sport.


Buyouts…verbiage in their contracts. Williams signed with stipulations that he agreed too.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78498 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:03 pm to
universities are just upset that they can’t collude to skirt labor laws anymore.

Why the Big 10 thinks their contract supersedes Washington law is beyond me.

Imagine writing a contract for 14 states and thinking it will be valid everywhere.
Posted by stitchop
jonesboro
Member since Oct 2020
661 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:04 pm to
Coaches don't have a court settlement that grants them the right to transfer every year and prevents the university from making any move to impede that decision
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
12538 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:06 pm to
Kentucky lol
Posted by Jebadeb
Member since Oct 2017
5720 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:08 pm to
If he owes money back to Washington, LSU will just pay it. Since he signed a few days ago, he may not have gotten anything. Maybe some type of signing bonus.

A court preventing him from playing is fairy tale.
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
3791 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

tampering


Why do people even bother throwing this term around, anymore?

Was it tampering when Matt Campbell gutted Iowa State's roster and took it to Penn State?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
21018 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:19 pm to
No it’ll more likely end up as a tampering issue like Bama went through with Iowa where Iowa wasn’t allowed to sign Kayden Proctor.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 8:19 pm
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
50615 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:20 pm to
No it won’t
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
18916 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 8:37 pm to
How is that enforceable? The only thing UW can do is sue for damages. Good luck proving damages in court when he withdrew 4 days into the portal period.
Posted by kbmaverick
Baton Rouge, Maui and Toledo Bend
Member since Nov 2009
1021 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

No it’ll more likely end up as a tampering issue like Bama went through with Iowa where Iowa wasn’t allowed to sign Kayden Proctor.

That is not true. He transferred to Iowa and signed and NIL agreement and then when the portal opened again in April he transferred back to Alabama. Stop making sheet up and get your facts straight. If he had not transferred back he would have played at Iowa.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
21018 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:05 pm to
Posted by Ptins944
Member since Jan 2019
2118 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

Pushing this will end up worse for Washington than LSU.

Too bad they can’t legally do that.

If he owes money back to Washington, LSU will just pay it. Since he signed a few days ago, he may not have gotten anything. Maybe some type of signing bonus.

A court preventing him from playing is fairy tale.
It will end much worse for Demond than either Washington or LSU. He may not get to play for either of them if this goes to court.

The BIG has standardized language in their NIL agreements and is apparently standing behind Washington's position.

Washington has a valid contract which covers his NIL. He cannot market those same NIL rights to another party without violating the existing contract, or Washington lets him out of the contract, which they aren't doing. IF LSU's actions prevents him from performing under the Washington contract, that is on LSU.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14072 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

1) The buyout in the contact reads the cost of the buyout is in the “sole discretion” of Washington.


So Washington can say Williams owes them a billion dollars for a buyout and you think that will fly lol?
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 11:51 pm
Posted by Papplesbeast
St. Louis
Member since Dec 2014
924 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:51 am to
Contracts override just about anything else. This will never make it to the Supreme Court, but if it did I guarantee they’d rule in favor of enforcing the contract.
Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
Member since Jul 2021
2194 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:04 am to
quote:

Do you think if you sign a contract that says you agree to be a sex slave for 30 years that you are going to be held to that by a court?


I keep offering to be one for Ana de Armas.
Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
Member since Jul 2021
2194 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:05 am to
quote:

NCAA is gonna punish Eastern Washington for this


History shows Missouri will be put on probation for this.
Posted by OU812
Michigan
Member since Apr 2004
13606 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 2:48 am to
Yet a Wisconsin player signed with them a year ago and then withdrew from school and signed up as a student at Miami. Walks on to the football team and is starting for Miami tonight. Not a word has been said about it by the national media.
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3762 posts
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:04 am to
And my understanding Young has a NIL deal with Miami also.


A player can sign 20 nil deals, what matters is where he is enrolled at when the 2026 season starts.

Washington has no recourse on Demond move, which is proven by the Young case of Wisconsin and the University of Miami.

Also where is the super outcry on this event last year and why has Miami not been disqualified or had to forfeit all the games that player has played in this season?

It is because NIL deals are media type deals, non-binding until a payment has been made.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter