Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3808
Registered on:3/22/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: One Piece: Season 2

Posted by tigger1 on 3/14/26 at 6:52 am to
Nami seems much older now and does not seem to be in the role. I admit the script is not the best for her role in the show.

Monkey D. Luffy the first season's energy is not there, and directing is a major problem. There are two scenes, I was like you kept that take when it was easy to tell they needed to do it over,

Roronoa Zoro tired hard with a bad script.

Usopp were they trying hard to make him a better character?

Lacks the energy and drive of the first season, still better than 90% of the new shows on TV.

re: Boasberg blocks FED subpoenas

Posted by tigger1 on 3/13/26 at 4:48 pm to
Boasberg makes up laws all the time in his rulings.

Subpoenas are used by grand juries all the time in US history and a judge cannot block the use of them by a grand jury.

Boasberg needs to be impeached over this and the lawfare he was told to stop by the USSC.
And what would be the cost to rebuild New York city, San Fransico, etc.

The cost in lives if nothing is done, what is that amount?

You have a state, that stated goal is the destruction of the US.

Jimmy Carter was blind in 1979 and many of us said so back in 1979.

The world is still paying for that costly mistake from a very weak President.

re: Girl Fights?

Posted by tigger1 on 3/11/26 at 5:10 am to
First girl on girl fight I saw was around 1968, by the time I was in Jr. High I had seen many.
Why would we need to bomb Cuba, the Cuban population know the story and want to be free.

There is far more to the US operation in Iran and the long game play, than many know.
You have the same thing happening on Facebook, unwanted left wing talking points posted by 1000's of people unwanted and uncalled for and not even on your friends list.

I had to block 100's of these accounts, just to be able to see my friends post again and group post,

Why was Facebook blocking my friends post and not showing them and letting these mass left wing posters fill pages of incoming post?

I have cut the number down to only about 150 and Facebook has started the something went wrong we can not block this at this time.

I was still getting Trump was on flights to Epstein's Island just last week, when we know for a fact he never was on the Island.
NotChexMix
Interesting.

Far different level of writing.

Hebrew can be read three ways, what it says, which we read translations from Hebrew to English.

The second way is symbology from the symbolism of the letter, which gives a far deeper meaning.

The third way is by number; each letter has a numerical value which means deeper step into math on a very high level.

We read the Bible in English like Genesis chapter 1 verse 1:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

That is just a base.

At step two let us look at the names: Adam Seth Enos Cainan Mahalalel Jared Enoch Methuselah Lamech Noah

Reading the names in a genealogy can get boring until you learn just how deep Hebrew really is and the meaning.

Adam =man
Seth = appointed
Enos = mortal
Cainan = sorrow
Jared = shall come down
Enoch = teaching
Methuselah = his death shall bring
Lamech = the despairing
Noah = rest/comfort

This goes through the whole Bible, and it is the same message, as the Bible in written from we read.

So, here is the message hidden in the genealogy of Adam to Noah:

Man is appointed mortal sorrow, the Blessed God shall come down teaching, his death shall bring the despairing rest and comfort.

The third part is not as easy to show, but to simplify the math has to work out are the translation is false.

A question why 153, there is a meaning there and why that number was used.




It is like this on all historical works:

1. It maters who wrote the book.
a. what they believed.
b. who they hate or admire
2. What is the press saying at the time.
a. who is writing the article
b. Is that person a friend or enemy of the person writing or his friends
3. What is the subject.
a. What is the general thought on the subject.


Right now, I have close to 200 books on Custer's Last Stand, in all the above count on what is being written.

You have hatred of players on both sides of the issue; the main difference today is the Sioux are looked on as victims, then as the enemy by most.
Today you have the Custer can do no wrong group and the Reno is the Devil.

One has to shift the sand of time and find out where the lines are drawn.

I may one day write a book on the battle.


The common theme since the 1800's is to downplay the number claimed in battles and history.

Today they think Custer ran into 1500 warriors, but Sitting bull said they had 5000 and Gall said 4000.

These are things that have to be worked out in history, always fighting the number game today no matter the subject in history.

Like the Black death that hit Europe and killed millions, at one point the number got very low on what the teachers taught in school, today the number has gone way back up; time and digs proved the numbers where very high.


6.5 million is a good base which are easy to find, Jewish population in 1933 is 9.5 million in Europe. Then check the number post war. And remember by 1939 that number will be higher.


In Hungary alone you get over 400,000 killed. The summer of 1944 was mass murder at Auschwitz; you can get the list of trains and total shipped to the camp and those that are selected to be workers. The Photo album from the camp from that summer shows how the system worked.

Thosee selected to work get the tattoo and are photographed.
Here is an example of Germans at work in Poland Sept-Dec 1939

Einsatzgruppe I, commanded by SS-Standartenführer Bruno Streckenbach, acted with 14th Army
Einsatzgruppe II, SS-Obersturmbannführer Emanuel Schäfer, acted with 10th Army
Einsatzgruppe III, SS-Obersturmbannführer und Regierungsrat Herbert Fischer, acted with 8th Army
Einsatzgruppe IV, SS-Brigadeführer Lothar Beutel, acted with 4th Army
Einsatzgruppe V, SS-Standartenfürer Ernst Damzog, acted with 3rd Army
Einsatzgruppe VI, SS-Oberführer Erich Naumann, acted in Wielkopolska
Einsatzgruppe VII, SS-Obergruppenführer Udo von Woyrsch and SS-Gruppenführer Otto Rasch, acted in Upper Silesia and Cieszyn Silesia[25]

Those groups of 100 men killed about 65,000.

This does not include the Heer shootings of Polish civilians and soldiers that had surrendered.
Not one of [Irving's] books, speeches or articles, not one paragraph, not one sentence in any of them, can be taken on trust as an accurate representation of its historical subject. All of them are completely worthless as history, because Irving cannot be trusted anywhere, in any of them, to give a reliable account of what he is talking or writing about ... if we mean by historian someone who is concerned to discover the truth about the past, and to give as accurate a representation of it as possible, then Irving is not a historian.

Irving ... had deliberately distorted and wilfully mistranslated documents, consciously used discredited testimony and falsified historical statistics. ... Irving has fallen so far short of the standards of scholarship customary amongst historians that he does not deserve to be called a historian at all.

David Irving how many counties is banned from, and how many times has he been sued?
In 1933 there are approximately 9.5 million Jews living in Europe.

By 1939 the number is higher.

You can look up each country, like Hungary is right at 445,000 living in that country in 1933.


By the end of the war, 2 in every 3 Jewish person living in Europe are killed.

I have books on all the camps; I have over 30 books on the Einsatzgruppen. I have books on the police groups used by the Germans in mass killings. I have books on the personnel and the main leaders of the groups.

I was asked in 2004 to go to the Ukraine to help with the oral history being put together by the French Prist, but due to work I could not help in this project.

There is a good book on German women in Russia during the war and what they saw and did. It was nothing to go to a field to picnic and it be a mass grave with the women shoes being caught on the hands, legs, arms of the dead as they walked across the fields. This book also covers the stories of some of those women who took part in the killings.

6.5 million Jews killed during the war is very close to the real number and remember at the camps only those who were chosen to be workers were given tattoo numbers and photographed (not all camps did this).

The summer of 1944 and the killing of the Hungarian Jews, will tell you just how bad the killings were.
In WW2 we firebombed millions and then cluster bombed the rescuers is the subject, you are the one leading many from fact to myths you have been taught about Iran and 1953.

Which as I post you have no clue on.

The US was going to back the Shah to stop the Soviet Union from invading Iran.
You are very slow the shah has far more power than the British system of today.

You cannot vote him out.
Japan's plan was to arm the children, women and old people and to keep attacking.

They were going to arm them with spears, as they did not have the weapons.
Slow you just admitted he used Parliament voted the Shah out, that is a coup.

Because like the British system the Shah holds the rulership over the Parliament like the old English system.
Your really that slow?


Says the guy who claims the PM being elected was a "coup", and ignores the actual coup (which the US admits was a coup that we helped create)

The vote in 1953 s controlled by the Mohammad Mosaddegh faction which happened.

The vote of 1952 is the question because Mohammad Mosaddegh and the shah stopped the vote:
Royalists 49
Pro-British
National Front Iran Party 30
Toilers Party
Muslim Warriors
Vacant 57
Total 136

As I said there are many factions as can be seen the NF only has 30 votes, that is Mohammad Mosaddegh. He controls only about 1/4 of Iran's population.

He led the coup against the shah; the shah is the ruler of the country not Parliament.

Kashani change sides first and then Behbahani (said to be CIA money). Those two and the Kurds along with the Shah loyalist controlled over 60% of the vote.

The coup was already felling before the MI6 and the CIA could act, but once the ball started to roll it was over.


No, SlowFlowPro the Iranian governments is made up on many factions, and it does not work like you think at all.

Once again you need to read much more before posting myths in fiction and read up on how their government worked at the time.

And why did the prime minster stop counting the vote?
So, SlowFlowPro you just got proven totally wrong on your 1953 myth.

And you do not even know the Shah was in talks with Britian, and US to change the oil agreement from 1941 and that US was backing the Shah.

You did not know the prime minister led a coup against the shah.

You may known that the prime minister broke the oil agreement.

But you didn't know the Soviet Union was fixing to invade Iran to enforce the agreement, and that is why the US helped Britian to put the shah back in power.
No, the US did not install the shah in Iran,

The shah was installed to power in Iran in 1941 by Britian and the Soviet Union.

He replaced his father.


The Prime Minister of Iran led a coup against the shah, and the Shah is the ruler of the country; not the prime minister,

re: Woodrow Wilson truly sucked

Posted by tigger1 on 3/8/26 at 9:14 am to
Do not forget he put us in WWI, a war we should have stayed out of, total waste of American manpower.