Started By
Message
re: Stop all the crying over Bama getting in
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:46 am to navy
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:46 am to navy
We did not hold up our part of the deal. An IB rematch in Atlanta would have been epic. We lost on the field, it is how the system works. Still go Tigers and Sooners.
If it is Bama vs UGA, Go Bama!!!
If it is Bama vs UGA, Go Bama!!!
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:48 am to LanierSpots
If it were about the best teams in the nation Auburn would be in the playoff instead of OU. Auburn would beat OU 8 of 10 meetings.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:50 am to bama1959
Becuz he is supporting your team
Duh
Duh
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:52 am to bama1959
quote:
Why does AU have the most intelligent posters on the rant?
My disdain for Auburn has actually decreased over the last few years due to the overwhelming majority of their posters here being rational and intelligent people who are an asset to this board.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:52 am to higgs_boson
quote:
if the offense makes some changes
Convert third downs and significantly improve TOP. Our defense takes a beating having to play 40 of the 60 minutes.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:54 am to nc14
quote:
Convert third downs and significantly improve TOP. Our defense takes a beating having to play 40 of the 60 minutes.
Agree there.
I do think they need to tailor more to the strengths of Hurts.
If the offense can shift the TOP they can compete with any of the other teams.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 6:55 am to LanierSpots
Interesting that our hated rivals are for the most part taking a pragmatic approach and LSU fans are whining and melting.
Agree with others that Auburn has some of the best posters on the rant. I still hate everything about them and hope auburn loses every game every year, but none of that changes the beating they gave us this year and that they have same strong posters on tRant.
Agree with others that Auburn has some of the best posters on the rant. I still hate everything about them and hope auburn loses every game every year, but none of that changes the beating they gave us this year and that they have same strong posters on tRant.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 7:06 am
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:13 am to higgs_boson
I originally thought downsizing LBs and safeties for speed was the issue. Having 57 second 3 and outs were the issue. We are not made to play fast. I also do not blame Hurts, he is who he is and mostly damn good. I might miss Lane a little though.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:16 am to LanierSpots
This is why Auburn fans have some of the best posters on here well said Lanier
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 7:20 am
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:17 am to nc14
This is just an outsider's point of view, but I think the faster defense was a good move.
It just seems like Alabama is not fully committed to some of the changes Lane wanted in offensive philosophy.
In most games, I do not think it would matter. The Alabama defense and field position is enough to win in most games. But I would be nervous about playing Clemson.
Still, I can think of no other team that deserved the shot more than Alabama.
It just seems like Alabama is not fully committed to some of the changes Lane wanted in offensive philosophy.
In most games, I do not think it would matter. The Alabama defense and field position is enough to win in most games. But I would be nervous about playing Clemson.
Still, I can think of no other team that deserved the shot more than Alabama.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:38 am to higgs_boson
Sorry don't agree. Does anyone really think Bama is better than AU 9 days after getting dominated by that team? AU got punished for playing the hardest schedule in country plain and simple.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:48 am to burke985
quote:You stupid bastard. That's exactly what the committee was formed for...to select the best 4 teams for a playoff to determine the national champion...DAMN!
Some times the best teams don't play for championships
Posted on 12/4/17 at 7:55 am to MrAUTigers
best thing is this will get the eight team playoff discussion in full swing. I know the current contract has to run its course but this will get it started in earnest.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:06 am to DonaldDuckworth
quote:
I guess I just don't see how you can win the national championship if you don't win your own state, or conference division, let alone conference. Not winning your conference should be a disqualifier until we have an 8 team playoff.
I see the argument but how do you treat Notre Dame in such a scenario (and you know they won't be left out of the system)? Change the playoff eligibility requirements to "you must win your conference, OR you must be Notre Dame." That seems wildly arbitrary to give an exception to one school like that.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:09 am to LanierSpots
Alabama deserves to be in. No doubt. I’d like to see the playoff except expanded to 8-16 teams. You know like every other collegiate sport.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:10 am to burke985
quote:
Some times the best teams don't play for championships. Isn't anyone fault but Bama all they had to do was beat auburn. Nick Saban cried and cried like a little spoiled brat and they gave him his cookie. What a scam
Saban made his case when the media asked him. Do you need an example of crying? See your post above. Jesus I will never understand how I grown man (if you are in fact one) would represent himself so poorly. Quite being such a pussy.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:14 am to thatthang
I would be okay with ND being off the list
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:15 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
I have no problem with it either way. It was down to OSU and bama and both had an argument
Yea, like I posted ad nauseum, neither side had a right to cry "screwjob" if they were left out. I'm glad we got in, but I realize we were the least ugly of the two.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:17 am to labamafan
quote:
best thing is this will get the eight team playoff discussion in full swing
Jesus Christ, I don't know why people want this shite. Why don't we just let everybody in? Then we don't have to watch the regular season.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News