Started By
Message

re: NCAA is going to have to bring back the sit out a year transfer rule

Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:42 pm to
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:42 pm to
NCAA is toast
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22620 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

No student athletes is in a binding contract - that’s called the NFL. If that’s what you want, it’s already available on Sundays




Well, it's not what I want. That's kind of the point.

If you want paid players, that is also available on Sunday. Of course, that comes with limits and many other rules required for competitive reasons to create a product that is viable on the free market.

Posted by CalLSU
Shreveport, la
Member since Feb 2009
798 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:04 pm to
I think a good idea for the transfer issue would be this: whatever school you sign with out of high school you HAVE to be at that school for 2 years. After that, you can transfer 1 time w/ no penalty and then it’s a 1 year waiting period at your 3rd school. Most kids, in this situation, probably didn’t play their freshmen year and so you would still have an extra year in order to sit the 4th year and play the 5th year at the 3rd school. There HAS to be some way to reward your initial school with at least 2 years of your services.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27422 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:09 pm to
Sign them to multi year contracts.

Rip off the band aid. Pretending we can put this all back in the box is laughably naive.

I don't fault the players if they want to treat this as a business/profession. The Universities need to follow suit.

Posted by RTRinTampa
Central FL
Member since Jan 2013
5532 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

The players used to be locked in and that was wrong. What is also wrong is how the pendulum swung so far to the opposite extreme, where players can disrupt the whole thing by chasing money. We need it to settle in a reasonable middle ground that is beneficial to both the teams and the players.


They are suppose to be students first. This train is off the tracks.
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
24264 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:18 pm to
Only change I would make is freshman and sophomores can enter but have to sit a year. Juniors and seniors unlimited. That I think would help with high school ranks and prevent so many kids hitting portal with no place to go
Posted by ALhunter
Member since Dec 2018
2934 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

They are suppose to be students first. This train is off the tracks.
This coming from a Bama fan is so incredibly rich I think I just got diabetes.
Posted by ALhunter
Member since Dec 2018
2934 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Only change I would make is freshman and sophomores can enter but have to sit a year. Juniors and seniors unlimited. That I think would help with high school ranks and prevent so many kids hitting portal with no place to go
If the concern is kids not having a place to go maybe the simplest solution is allowing a soft "test period" for a week or so. People who want to hit the portal can enter their names during that period. At the end of the week they can choose to stay in the portal for the live period or stick with their current team. Kinda like the NFL draft.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14791 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:51 pm to
Absolutely agree with the OP. It was fine how it was - you have to sit one year unless you’ve graduated.

This instant nonsense has led to a lack of team cohesion across the league - guys don’t stay together long enough to establish chemistry.
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
9672 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:09 pm to
quote:


Nah, I like seeing all you old snowflakes melting about young people having free will and the ability to capitalize on their worth


We liked college football because it wasn't like the NFL.

It's still not like the NFL...it's worse. The NFL has salary caps. And more structured trades/contracts.

College football is now worse.
Posted by NaturalStateReb
Arkansas
Member since Jun 2012
1443 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Also need to cap it at one transfer and that is it. You can leave again, but must do so as a walk on. They are going to have to put the brakes on this mess they have created.


No thanks.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25588 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Dude. Almost every school now has an NIL collective because there aren't enough corporate sponsors interested enough to give every athlete a marketing deal. The NIL collectives are a stop-gap measure instituted by the schools.

The collectives are run by boosters.
Once it was apparent that the ncaa was not going to get involved in NIL (because it would be pointless. There are too many ways to reorganize the same thing legally), the collectives appear as a convenient way to "self police" NIL so the kids do not get taken advantage of by scheisters. University adjacent programming sponsors the collectives to steer support. I haven't seen any collective go as far as publishing "the official collective of ________ University" although that may be only a matter of time.

The collectives are not a stop gap to anything.
They will exist as long as the ncaa allows them to exist.
And if the ncaa tries to restrict collectives because of boosters, a few forms filed at the secretary of state and the reorganization is now legal in some other slight variation.

NIL does not require anything corporate to be a sponsor. The athlete owns his NIL. He can solicit to individuals, nonprofits, etc.. The only restriction is that the compensation cannot be from the university or athletic association.
Posted by XenScott
Pensacola
Member since Oct 2016
3129 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 7:44 am to
I have an idea. When you get your AA you can transfer freely just like when you get your bachelor’s degree. Other than that, you have to redshirt a year but not lose a year of eligibility.
Posted by BRbornandraised
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jun 2013
527 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

I'm not sure why so many people don't realize this. Maybe it's b/c of the free year that the NCAA gave everyone for COVID? A lot of portal guys the last couple of years have been seniors looking to use their extra year of eligibility. Perhaps once everyone has exhausted their COVID expectation the portal will lower a bit?


Yeah Covid really messed things up. Guys have like 6 or 7 years of eligibility now. lol with the covid eligibility thing phasing out I think this will all calm down some. If a guy doesn’t have 6 years of eligibility I feel like he will be less willing to transfer? Could be wrong
Posted by RoscoeSanCarlos
Member since Oct 2017
1325 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 7:56 am to
Typical millennial who thinks he/she/they has all the answers. The reality is you don’t know shite.

You should post less. But, here’s your trophy…


Posted by Loganville Vols
Loganville Georgia
Member since Feb 2021
862 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 8:02 am to
The court will strike that down. Coaches can leave with no penalty players. Also players should be able to leave with no penalty. It’s a free market unless you want to NCAA to be like a communist country like China.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36507 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 8:18 am to
quote:


Nah, I like seeing all you old snowflakes melting about young people having free will and the ability to capitalize on their worth


Will you still be gloating when it's August 2023 and only half the players in the portal now are on scholarship anywhere?
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24702 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Coaches are a bit upset that they put the transfer portal opening at the same time as the early signing period. I think the portal should simply open for a single 2 week span in the late spring or early summer. If you sign with a team, you should stay with the team through bowl season. They should also allow the high school players to finish recruitment before existing players are allowed to transfer.


I figured having them occur at the same time would make it easier for coaches to fill their list more neatly.

Recruiting from the portal and high school at the same time seems it would be easier to maintain your lists... committed, targets, etc.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Do we not live in a capitalist country? Why shouldn't the NCAA operate like the rest of our society? You don't think it's wrong when businesses and rich people "disrupt the whole thing by chasing money"? Chasing money is the principle that this country's culture was built on. If you said "chasing the money" was wrong in regards to anyone other than college athletes, you would be labeled an evil commie Marxist who doesn't understand economics. But I guess it's cool to be an evil commie Marxist as long as you're using it to control the most physically able 18-21 yr old young men of our society, who just happen to be 90% black.

Oh, I get it, you're one of those kids who consistently votes against his own interests in the pursuit of some kind of ideological purity.

Moron.

Why are you so focused on the workers? Why don't you care about the product? Is it capitalism that makes you want to degrade the quality of the product for the good of the workers? Do you think just because the Walmart managers make 6 figures, the special needs greeters should too? Is that capitalism?
Posted by CatBBN
Member since Jan 2020
2426 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:56 am to
I thought it was established that you get a one time free transfer and any after that you have to sit. Doesn’t seem like that’s being enforced
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter