Started By
Message
NCAA Enforcement - Alabama. You decide!
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:37 am
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:37 am
LINK
- Fair?
- Measured?
- Consistent?
- Transparent?
Please blow it up.
- Fair?
- Measured?
- Consistent?
- Transparent?
Please blow it up.
This post was edited on 11/21/20 at 6:40 am
7
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:42 am to StLBg
It’s a slap on the wrist so I’m thrilled with the outcome. It’s a complete non punishment.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:47 am to StLBg
Very fair. We accept.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 6:49 am to SummerOfGeorge
The REC doing work
Posted on 11/21/20 at 7:20 am to StLBg
Don't think this response is what you're
looking for---but yes, finally Alabama gets a
fair, measured and transparent decision
by the NCAA. Consistent ? No, the NCAA has
never been consistent in enforcement penalties.
Just one example, North Carolina ran
sham, fake Afro-American classes attended by
numerous athletes through the years for grades---
classes that didn't even exist except on paper, in the biggest academic fraud case
ever handled by the NCAA.
The investigation showed athletes enrolled in the
fake classes 167-times over several years. Of
course Roy Smith was oblivious to it all.
The penalty ? Nothing.
looking for---but yes, finally Alabama gets a
fair, measured and transparent decision
by the NCAA. Consistent ? No, the NCAA has
never been consistent in enforcement penalties.
Just one example, North Carolina ran
sham, fake Afro-American classes attended by
numerous athletes through the years for grades---
classes that didn't even exist except on paper, in the biggest academic fraud case
ever handled by the NCAA.
The investigation showed athletes enrolled in the
fake classes 167-times over several years. Of
course Roy Smith was oblivious to it all.
The penalty ? Nothing.
This post was edited on 11/21/20 at 7:22 am
Posted on 11/21/20 at 7:49 am to StLBg
It's Bama Basketball, nobody really cares.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 7:54 am to 55Gator
Then why are you taking the time to comment on it? Do better.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:04 am to AHM21
Auburn and LSU about to get worst punishment.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:13 am to StLBg
sounds ok to me
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:25 am to StLBg
Other schools have much harsher punishments coming
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:32 am to WildcatMike
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/3/23 at 3:41 am
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:35 am to StLBg
quote:Only if Auburn gets the same punishment
Fair?
- Measured?
- Consistent?
- Transparent?
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:52 am to WDE24
Ours involved a coach. We did already self impose sanctions. As long as a post season ban is not included, we are good.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 8:54 am to WDE24
quote:
Only if Auburn gets the same punishment
What if their infractions aren’t the same in magnitude or number?
Posted on 11/21/20 at 9:00 am to KingOfTheWorld
quote:
What if their infractions aren’t the same in magnitude or number?
I think the big difference will be that Auburn's involved an actual coach and over a longer period of time. They already imposed some sanctions on themselves, so we'll see how much the NCAA adds on.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 9:08 am to 55Gator
quote:
It's Bama Basketball, nobody really cares.
I hate to say it but I agree. We're flying under the radar as far as basketball goes.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 9:47 am to BamaRoo
quote:
No, the NCAA has
never been consistent in enforcement penalties.
Just one example, North Carolina ran
sham, fake Afro-American classes attended by
numerous athletes through the years for grades---
classes that didn't even exist except on paper, in the biggest academic fraud case
ever handled by the NCAA.
The investigation showed athletes enrolled in the
fake classes 167-times over several years.
Whoever wrote this is a fool. The NCAA could not do anything to a university for how they handle their academic programs and why the case was basically dropped. The reason the NCAA got involved was to see if extra benefits were given to athletes but the classes involved more non athletes then athletes making it not violate special treatment for athletes.
UNC did get put on probation though by SACS, which could affect their accreditation.
quote:
Of course Roy Smith was oblivious to it all. The penalty ? Nothing.
Not sure who Roy Smith is but it was going on before Roy Williams and other sports as well.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 10:15 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
I think the big difference will be that Auburn's involved an actual coach and over a longer period of time. They already imposed some sanctions on themselves, so we'll see how much the NCAA adds on.
Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, the NCAA praised Alabama for their transparency and cooperation.
Foreshadowing? Who knows, but Auburn appears to have at least taken similar actions during this process.
Based on how the NCAA is posturing thus far, I wouldn’t want to be one of the programs in the crosshairs that has done none of this.
Posted on 11/21/20 at 10:19 am to TideWarrior
quote:
The NCAA could not do anything to a university for how they handle their academic programs and why the case was basically dropped
Oh please. If you're going to call someone a
"fool" don't follow with a foolish statement.
The NCAA major infractions database shows
division one institutions have been punished at
least 15 times for academic fraud or misconduct in the past decade. You may remember Syracuse or
SMU academic fraud cases where the NCAA imposed
punishment to name a couple.
Yeah, as to the name, pardon for combining Dean Smith with Roy Williams. It was Smith, "the virtue
of integrity" under whose nose almost all of the
academic scandal was taking place but according
to the whistle blower, must have been the only
one at UNC who didn't have a clue about it through
all those years.
Posted on 11/22/20 at 9:31 am to WildcatMike
And there it is....the deflection.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News