Started By
Message
re: March Madness: Wisconsin 71 vs. Kentucky 64 I Final - Wisc/Duke for Title
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:03 pm to Pettifogger
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:03 pm to Pettifogger
Bray fricked up when he called that to when ND was still in the backcourt with like 1:39 left I knew that would burn him.
Cal being kind of a dick there acting like that wasn't the closest game of the year.
Cal being kind of a dick there acting like that wasn't the closest game of the year.
6
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:04 pm to Othello
Understatement of the year
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:04 pm to Othello
Well hell of a great team you just beat UK congrats on the win. 
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:05 pm to Othello
Cal is so smug. I don't see why it's so hard to give credit where it's due.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:05 pm to lefty08
duke has more than notre dame does...duke has for damn sure has more than tx am ole miss lsu and georgia have...uk isnt unbeatble man...dont underestimate coaching either buddy. coach k will have duke ready to play u watch my man. they both have to make it there first but i do believe duke can beat kentucky
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:07 pm to lovemytigers1
quote:
thank you officals nd 13 shots ken 20 shots free throws cost nd game difference in game nd would have won
grant's play after his long 3-pointer hurt nd more.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:07 pm to Othello
quote:
Cal being kind of a dick there acting like that wasn't the closest game of the year.
I'm glad he did that. Their closest games were against SEC teams and these talking heads just want to act like beating a proxy ACC team is more impressive. Screw that. Tell them how it is Cal.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:08 pm to Othello
quote:
Cal being kind of a dick there acting like that wasn't the closest game of the year.
It wasn't. Two SEC teams took us to OT. And all we've heard is Notre Dame is more "tested" playing in the ACC.
frick 'em.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:09 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
I'm glad he did that. Their closest games were against SEC teams and these talking heads just want to act like beating a proxy ACC team is more impressive. Screw that. Tell them how it is Cal.
That was a great game, but the SEC gave UK games like that a few times this season. Either way, I want to see a perfect season for the Cats.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:10 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Well hell of a great team you just beat UK congrats on the win
ND has an excellent offense. Every guy on the floor is a threat on the cut or the three.
UK will see more of the same with Wisc. UK does not handle the pic and roll very well.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:17 pm to BluegrassBelle
Ya acc isn't better than sec at all
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:19 pm to imjustafatkid
The ACC is better than the SEC. They had 4 teams in the sweet sixteen and the 2nd best team in the ACC just took the the best team in the SEC to the wire. Don't be so biased that you can't give the ACC any credit.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:22 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
quote:
Ya acc isn't better than sec at all
Never said that. But just because UK plays in the SEC doesn't mean they weren't tested. That's apparently the shitty perception since that was asked. I'm glad Cal called them on it.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:28 pm to Othello
I disagree with Duke being the best team, maybe for the entire season. But ND was clearly the best playing ACC team in March. They had no problem with Duke or UNC in ACC tourney. This was the test I was worried about. And those of you who are saying Cal shouldn't say what he says, are just wrong. ND played lights out tonight and UK really played poor. And most of it was mistakes, missed FT, awful FG%, turnovers by making mental mistakes. ND really did nothing to force any of it. I think the blow out caused the sluggish performance tonight.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:30 pm to Othello
quote:
Cal being kind of a dick there acting like that wasn't the closest game of the year.
It wasn't. Glad he said that. The media disregards everything that happened in conference play when it comes to UK because they played in the SEC. I laughed hard when they were saying that UK couldn't hang with WVU's press because they had never seen a team that played like that. Lol.
ETA: hell it was like they had never watched UK either, just saw their record and knew they were probably good
This post was edited on 3/28/15 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 3/28/15 at 10:53 pm to GetmorewithLes
I'm pulling for Kentucky, but they better bring their A-game against Wisconsin, especially in the second half. That will be a hell of a game.
Posted on 3/28/15 at 11:24 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
ND really did nothing to force any of it
Besides crash the glass really hard, brilliantly execute their offense for 38 minutes until they inexplicably stopped running it, get Towns in foul trouble and run the pick and roll to perfection damn near all game, you're right. They had nothing to do with it.
Posted on 3/29/15 at 6:48 am to VADawg
I didn't say they didn't play great on offense , re-read. I wa specifically talking about UK offense. UK has a lot of missed opportunities on O, and none of it was forced by ND. I gave ND credit for playing incredible which they did. But UK scoring was held in check by mental mistakes by UK.
Posted on 3/29/15 at 12:30 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
I didn't say they didn't play great on offense , re-read. I wa specifically talking about UK offense. UK has a lot of missed opportunities on O, and none of it was forced by ND. I gave ND credit for playing incredible which they did. But UK scoring was held in check by mental mistakes by UK.
Sooooo... you're saying that Notre Dame didn't nearly beat Kentucky, but Kentucky nearly beat Kentucky?
Posted on 3/29/15 at 12:43 pm to lovemytigers1
quote:
thank you officals
nd 13 shots
ken 20 shots
free throws
cost nd game
difference in game
nd would have won
Don't forget Auguste sitting for over 9:00 in first half.
Page 138 of 176
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News