| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Near Exxon |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | all things LSU |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 23912 |
| Registered on: | 6/24/2009 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Judge rules that major portions of the National Firearms Act are unconstitutional
Posted by Scoob on 8/16/26 at 3:18 pm to LoneStarTiger
quote:quote:
I hope everyone in every free state SBRs their pistols.
Just so I’m clear, you can just do it now, right? No more forms or any such nonsense?
I’m a member of GOA and have a pistol lower from PSA. Everything I’ve read says I should be covered.
I saw a video, I think mrgunsandgear, commenting on that the other day.
As of now, I think you definitely still need a PSA lower, since they were one of the plaintiffs.
Which sucks, because the best AR9 lowers are Foxtrot Mike or Spikes Tactical if you want a lower w LRBHO. I have a FM, a Del-Ton (Spikes clone), and an Aero w a New Frontier upper (upper has LRBHO on that).
I mention that, because for the 9mm platform, an 8-9" barrel is actually the ideal size, and those would be the ones I'd like to SBR first.
Honest, actual answer:
Loading up on high school 5 stars, especially big money for each one, is no longer a good thing.
You're spending your boosters' NIL war chest on guys who likely won't contribute right away, and half of whom may hit the portal in a year if they aren't locked in starters.
Far better use of cash to target productive underclassmen that you know you can plug in. You gotta put high school kids on the "rookie contract".
Loading up on high school 5 stars, especially big money for each one, is no longer a good thing.
You're spending your boosters' NIL war chest on guys who likely won't contribute right away, and half of whom may hit the portal in a year if they aren't locked in starters.
Far better use of cash to target productive underclassmen that you know you can plug in. You gotta put high school kids on the "rookie contract".
quote:
and Jack Pyburn just got a sack
He got at least 2 in this game.
How many did he get last season?
quote:I'd prefer we try to get the best possible players on the team.
I'd prefer they come up with a policy to not promise recruits things like a jersey number.
DJ Pickett was a consensus 5 star, very highly rated guy. After Underwood flipped, it was Pickett, not Harlem Berry, who was the highest rated guy we signed.
He came in, started, and performed well enough to make Freshman All-American. And note, he did that with Delane at the other corner, so teams came at him more often than you'd expect. And he faced guys like Pavia (2nd in the Heisman), Simpson (1st rd pick), Chambliss (preseason All American based on last year's performance) etc.
We fought hard to get him, his final list also included Oregon (been in the last 2 playoffs) and Miami (made the CFP finals). Was also chased by UGA and quite a few others.
He asked if he could keep #5, during his recruiting process- not after the fact. We said yes. Who knows how much that went into his final decision, but you never know. I doubt Oregon or Miami would hesitate to give it to him.
And now, after not getting the number he'd asked to get, his team went 7-6, coach got fired, new guy (Kiffin) coming in and having to recruit people to stay. Again, Oregon or Miami would take him in a heartbeat. Apparently the question of the number came up, or we'd never have this even happen. Kiffin had to decide whether to "respect" a former QB he didn't recruit or coach, who's now in the NFL, or a starting corner on his team that he wanted to retain.
quote:Well, if you are competing with Oregon, Miami, UGA etc to sign him, telling him "you will take what we tell you to" might be enough for him to sign with someone else.
So why not just tell recruits and current players this exact thing and assign them whatever number LSU wants ? what would be the issue with that ?
Neither Jayden Daniels nor Joe Burrow will help you win games in the next couple years, as they're in the NFL now. But having an elite shutdown corner would, that's what they hoped Pickett would become, and btw he's on track to do that.
Now, if they ask for #20, that's the one number officially retired. You can legit say "we don't issue that number here", and you have some justification.
quote:quote:
J.D’s No Joe
Also DJ is no JD5 at this point either.
You do understand that Pickett is one of the highest DB recruits LSU has ever signed, and he was a freshman All American? He could easily be the next superstar corner from here.
Poor management can destroy any conference, and something both the SEC and Big 10 need to be aware of. NOBODY is safe
You ask how the ACC is in bad shape, but hell- look at the Pac 12.
Consider- absolutely no geographical rival, they had zero market competition for anything West of the Rockies.
They had both classic Bluebloods (USC in football, UCLA in basketball) and modern New Money elites (Oregon in football, Arizona basketball) in the major sports. Arguably equal or better than the SEC for baseball. Plenty of secondary powers, great rivalries, regional continuity. Some fantastic TV markets. And with Stanford, you had the single best "wins in every sport" school, they have over 170 titles in all sports.
This should have been an untouchable conference, even if they just sat on their thumbs. But somehow, it went belly-up.
In contrast, the ACC and Big 12 have a lot less in their favor. The ACC is bloated and over-extended, it's basically 2 conferences without a single current elite now that Clemson is declining. FSU and Miami remain shells of their former selves, even with Miami making the title game. The Big East swallow has been a big loss, nobody on that side has been any good.
The Big 12 is a bunch of refugees and castaways, that couldn't make it into the conference expansion round.
You ask how the ACC is in bad shape, but hell- look at the Pac 12.
Consider- absolutely no geographical rival, they had zero market competition for anything West of the Rockies.
They had both classic Bluebloods (USC in football, UCLA in basketball) and modern New Money elites (Oregon in football, Arizona basketball) in the major sports. Arguably equal or better than the SEC for baseball. Plenty of secondary powers, great rivalries, regional continuity. Some fantastic TV markets. And with Stanford, you had the single best "wins in every sport" school, they have over 170 titles in all sports.
This should have been an untouchable conference, even if they just sat on their thumbs. But somehow, it went belly-up.
In contrast, the ACC and Big 12 have a lot less in their favor. The ACC is bloated and over-extended, it's basically 2 conferences without a single current elite now that Clemson is declining. FSU and Miami remain shells of their former selves, even with Miami making the title game. The Big East swallow has been a big loss, nobody on that side has been any good.
The Big 12 is a bunch of refugees and castaways, that couldn't make it into the conference expansion round.
re: When was the #5 Promise made?
Posted by Scoob on 8/14/26 at 2:07 pm to coolpapaboze
I have zero problem with what LSU and Kiffin did.
As i understand, only #20 is officially out of rotation. Burrow's #9 can be assigned, they just haven't done it.
Let's forget all the "Joe won the natty and Jayden didn't" crap, it's not relevant. Jayden will/should get his jersey retired, because winning the Heisman is a great individual accomplishment.
DJ Pickett wasn't a random high school recruit, he was an elite 5 star corner. Think Deion Sanders, Patrick Peterson, Derek Stingley, etc. Everyone recruited him, going back to late middle school for some. There might be some folks that say "he ain't that good", but if he hit the portal he'd instantly be the top player in it, due to potential and what he's already shown.
LSU outbid UGA, Oregon, Miami, Fla State, Fla and others to get him to come here. Part of that was a (maybe casual?) promise that he could keep his #5, which he wore his entire playing career up until college. They didn't pull that number off of a returning player, forcing someone else to give it up. And it's not like it's a number that doesn't fit the position (like, giving 99 to a QB, or 21 to a lineman).
If someone coming in wanted #9, and was considered an elite, can't-miss prospect (which is what Pickett was), you give it to him. It doesn't detract from the prior player.
As i understand, only #20 is officially out of rotation. Burrow's #9 can be assigned, they just haven't done it.
Let's forget all the "Joe won the natty and Jayden didn't" crap, it's not relevant. Jayden will/should get his jersey retired, because winning the Heisman is a great individual accomplishment.
DJ Pickett wasn't a random high school recruit, he was an elite 5 star corner. Think Deion Sanders, Patrick Peterson, Derek Stingley, etc. Everyone recruited him, going back to late middle school for some. There might be some folks that say "he ain't that good", but if he hit the portal he'd instantly be the top player in it, due to potential and what he's already shown.
LSU outbid UGA, Oregon, Miami, Fla State, Fla and others to get him to come here. Part of that was a (maybe casual?) promise that he could keep his #5, which he wore his entire playing career up until college. They didn't pull that number off of a returning player, forcing someone else to give it up. And it's not like it's a number that doesn't fit the position (like, giving 99 to a QB, or 21 to a lineman).
If someone coming in wanted #9, and was considered an elite, can't-miss prospect (which is what Pickett was), you give it to him. It doesn't detract from the prior player.
quote:Pickett was an elite prospect, his recruitment didn't just start in his senior season. Teams were on him as early as his freshman year.
You do know that Jayden was already in the League when DJ was being recruited right?
And it came down to us, Oregon and Miami, with Fla, Fla State and UGA still in the mix.
So I don't doubt promises were made. Teams need to honor those.
re: Amendments just added to Protect College Sports Act may have just blown up the ACC
Posted by Scoob on 8/14/26 at 12:24 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
The GORs still exist
I thought if they got enough to agree to leave, the GOR dissolves.
Fine, beat me up on this :lol:
Yeah, I'm greedy... or like to get deals.
I remember when Bronco Arms had this at Shotshow a couple years ago, the price being tossed around was definitely sub-500. Most speculated it would be in the Shockwave range.
It's a tacticool range toy with little practical use, and an offbrand.
Yeah, I'm greedy... or like to get deals.
I remember when Bronco Arms had this at Shotshow a couple years ago, the price being tossed around was definitely sub-500. Most speculated it would be in the Shockwave range.
It's a tacticool range toy with little practical use, and an offbrand.
re: Greed sucks; the SPASS 12
Posted by Scoob on 8/12/26 at 10:05 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
You can always buy the real thing for $5k.
No thanks :lol:
Like I said, I'd strongly consider going $400, which is probably overpriced for what you'd get. It's a reproduction, and not 100% to the original.
If I want retro reproductions, I have less invested in my AR 15 A1 with the 20" pencil barrel, integral carry handle and old Colt furniture, + my Cetme C, combined.
Greed sucks; the SPASS 12
Posted by Scoob on 8/12/26 at 9:38 pm
I saw this a couple years ago hinted at, a Turkish clone of the SPAS 12. At the time, people anticipated this highly, because at the end of the day it was still a cheapo Turk, and it was a trendy but in reality pretty crappy original shotgun. Speculation was that it was going to be priced around $400, to capitalize on it being a clone of something "cool".
Ok, now it's been released, and they want... over a thousand? frick all that. I'm not paying that much for a cheap copy. I bet a ton of others won't either.
LINK
I hope they choke on the damn things, and none move.
Ok, now it's been released, and they want... over a thousand? frick all that. I'm not paying that much for a cheap copy. I bet a ton of others won't either.
LINK
I hope they choke on the damn things, and none move.
quote:
I have no idea what Miles’ gameplan was in the rematch, I think his stubbornness made him believe he could use the same approach as 9-6 and win.
He was going up against the GOAT Saban and it showed.
To be fair: objectively LSU was fricked.
The gameplan in the first game was to match our defense against their offense, and have Jarrett Lee run the pro-style offense we'd been running the first half of the season. That was a no-go; we could not run, and Lee was rattled under heavy pressure. There were several "should have been pick-6's" that Lee got away with. Les pulled him before disaster struck
Jefferson running option was the ace in the hole, Saban et al weren't prepared for that. And eventually, LSU wore them down and finally ran on them in OT.
What was his gameplan in the rematch? He stuck with Jefferson, because he knew Lee would collapse under pressure... and there just wasn't another backup plan. That Bama team was elite, you couldn't take the same team and beat them twice. Hell, they blew everyone else out, including Arkansas who was damn good.
Call it whining if you like, I don't care- that was unfair to LSU. Alabama was the consensus best team in the country (favored game 1), LSU went into their stadium, played their asses off and got lucky breaks, and came away with the win. That's happened a few times in football, and oh well, the better team lost. They didn't get another chance because everyone thought they were the better team... except that year, it happened.
re: Georgia beat TCU 65-7
Posted by Scoob on 8/12/26 at 6:14 am to teamjackson
quote:Nah :lol:
21-0 takes the cake
As frustrating as it was to watch, at least you still had half the team putting up a fight. In the 4th quarter, one team had done zero on offense, the other had 5 scoring drives, and it was only 15-0. One big play gets you back in it. That was death by a thousand papercuts.
65-7 was complete domination on both sides of the ball, and it was against a team that had actually won their semifinal to get there.
quote:quote:
Probably the one with lowest expectations. Make millions with a mediocre product.
This. You always see Georgia, Bama, Texas, A&M, LSU in "best coaching jobs" lists. bullshite.
Go make millions with lowered expectations somewhere else. That's the dream job.
I remember listening to the Chuck Oliver show a couple years ago, he was criticizing Lane Kiffin for turning down the Auburn job. Said he could win 9-10 games a year at Ole Miss and they would build him a statue, but he'd never win a title there. Glass ceiling job.
Now, everyone is mad at Lane because he didn't make the same decision with LSU. :lol:
I do think the "best" job description has changed. You need the resources, which now means you need millionaire boosters willing to buy you a team. It should be recognizable with tradition so you can still recruit on a level field (so you can sign the guy if the money is equal, instead of having to overbid on everyone). You'd like rational expectations so you're not on the hot seat for winning 9 games a couple years.
Baker, so far, seems to be a 1 scheme guy. Man coverage and heavy pass rush. Upfield pressure.
I haven't seen him adjust to try to contain if someone beats the pressure.
I haven't seen him adjust to try to contain if someone beats the pressure.
quote:I pulled up the page on espn, and looked at defensive stats. Outside of missing Whit Weeks, it looked like the guys we saw playing all year. Including, you know, a few guys who got drafted; Delane, Haulsey, Perkins.
Vandy.. who all did we even have playing against vandy?
:dunno:
re: Anonymous SEC Defensive Coordinator on Sam Leavitt
Posted by Scoob on 8/11/26 at 12:12 am to John Rambeaux
All these snide little comments about Leavitt, about whether Kiffin deserves credit for Chambliss etc, that's just someone taking shots at Kiffin and LSU.
And it's off target, anyway.
I've been watching LSU a long time. We've had 3 great QBs since Hodson; Russell, Burrow, and Daniels. Most of the time our guy isn't even at the talent level that Leavitt is. Yet, we've played for 4 national titles in that timeframe, and only once with an elite QB. We're going to be ok.
And it's off target, anyway.
I've been watching LSU a long time. We've had 3 great QBs since Hodson; Russell, Burrow, and Daniels. Most of the time our guy isn't even at the talent level that Leavitt is. Yet, we've played for 4 national titles in that timeframe, and only once with an elite QB. We're going to be ok.
re: Ole Miss fans…is Austin Simmons a decent quarterback?
Posted by Scoob on 8/10/26 at 7:54 pm to captdalton
I think the issue is-
Kiffin has a system. He knows how to run a potent offense with anybody at QB, it's quick reads and keys, and timing. If you come in and learn it, and then you trust the system and run it on time, you will have a good year. He's not building around one guy, he wants something you can keep plugging people into and keep rolling.
That's why Lane gets the love and the big bucks.
The problem comes in when you have a guy who's highly touted, has confidence in his arm, and wants to push for bigger plays. I think Simmons is one of those guys; the risk is you get out of time with the system and it sputters.
Chambliss got his chance, trusted the system and stayed within it.
Mizzou might make their offense around what Simmons can do, and he may look really good in that.
Kiffin has a system. He knows how to run a potent offense with anybody at QB, it's quick reads and keys, and timing. If you come in and learn it, and then you trust the system and run it on time, you will have a good year. He's not building around one guy, he wants something you can keep plugging people into and keep rolling.
That's why Lane gets the love and the big bucks.
The problem comes in when you have a guy who's highly touted, has confidence in his arm, and wants to push for bigger plays. I think Simmons is one of those guys; the risk is you get out of time with the system and it sputters.
Chambliss got his chance, trusted the system and stayed within it.
Mizzou might make their offense around what Simmons can do, and he may look really good in that.
re: Archie Manning to get a statue on ole Miss campus
Posted by Scoob on 8/10/26 at 7:28 pm to Mo Debumly
quote:not true. I remember that Saints team,
He would have been better in the pros too, if he went anywhere with a surrounding cast. The Saints had Archie and Tom Dempsey.
You had Archie, wes chandler, chuck Muncie, Tony galbreath. They were coming off a 7-9 season, were supposed to be good.
1-16.
Popular
1












