Started By
Message
re: LSU fans is the juice with the squeeze?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:45 pm to ManBearSharkReb
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:45 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Cope seethe and dilate. You lost trannny
You're still so mad
1
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:45 pm to 03 West CoChamps
What part of no player has signed and is practicing with LSU don’t you understand?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:45 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Well when the SEC puts on rules in that situation then we can have that conversation.
You don’t think the SEC has rules against playing ineligible players?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:46 pm to 03 West CoChamps
The TRO is 10 days, next ruling on it is Monday Aug 31, if they win that the NCAA will drop the case
willfully ignorant, it is the literal point of the injunction
quote:
If there is an injunction against the SEC the SEC will not be able to penalize a school for playing those players, period
Also not true
willfully ignorant, it is the literal point of the injunction
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:46 pm to lsusteve1
quote:
What part of no player has signed and is practicing with LSU don’t you understand?
Why hasn’t Lane said that he won’t take them regardless of the court situation then? They obviously aren’t on roster now but the plan has been to add them ASAP. The last day to add classes is 9/2.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:47 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Why hasn’t Lane said that he won’t take them regardless of the court situation then?
Um, because that'd be completely retarded.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:47 pm to SidewalkTiger
About what? Watching lane and lsu get cucked? Watching Trinidad and Kewan torch your shitty D Line in three weeks?
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:47 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Why hasn’t Lane said that he won’t take them regardless of the court situation then? They obviously aren’t on roster now but the plan has been to add them ASAP. The last day to add classes is 9/2.
Because he’s doing what is legal until it isn’t
Where’s your anger for teams that actually have gone a step further? We know the answer……
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm to UnluckyTiger
quote:
Poor Ole Miss. Y’all are a dead program and you don’t even know it yet.
Ask their in-state brethren how it went when they hired their young D-coordinator to replace the head coach that left
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Watching Trinidad and Kewan torch your shitty D Line in three weeks?
Nice, you just jinxed yourself again.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:48 pm to lowhound
Totally same scenario! fricking RETARDS
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:50 pm to ThePoo
quote:
The TRO is 10 days, next ruling on it is Monday Aug 31, if they win that the NCAA will drop the case
I am almost positive Monday is the suit against the SEC and a completely different suit. Nothing will be permanent for months when the suit is actually litigated. TROs are temporary until the suit actually plays out.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:51 pm to Champs
quote:LOL if you need those two guys to secure #4, you never had a chance.
will be once we add #4 since 2000
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:51 pm to REBEL5 AC
quote:
LOL if you need those two guys to secure #4, you never had a chance.
You needed one just to actually be relevant
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:55 pm to SidewalkTiger
How many snaps you think Big Xav will get?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:55 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:No, it is the suit against the NCAA
I am almost positive Monday is the suit against the SEC and a completely different suit. Nothing will be permanent for months when the suit is actually litigated. TROs are temporary until the suit actually plays out.
players are currently under a 10 day TRO, if they lose monday, everything is over for them and the SEC rule is a moot point
They may try to make an argument that the ruling applies to the SEC under the language of the injunction but the suit does not specifically name the SEC
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:57 pm to ThePoo
quote:
No, it is the suit against the NCAA players are currently under a 10 day TRO, if they lose monday, everything is over for them They may try to make an argument that the ruling applies to the SEC under the language of the injunction but the suit does not specifically name the SEC
I need proof on that. I don’t think you are correct.
Also you can’t Willy nilly add another party to a suit at the last minute because you want to. How you want this to work is not at all how any of this works.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:58 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
If they play the players
If my aunt had dick, she'd be my uncle
Did those players sign a contract to play for LSU or not?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:58 pm to lsusteve1
quote:
You needed one just to actually be relevant
One was too fat to get off the ground on a play that could have sent us to the national championship.
The other made a couple of key catches and a couple of really costly drops. Enjoy russian roulette.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:59 pm to 03 West CoChamps
Why don't you ask fans of other programs that are also doing this?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News