RB10

quote:

---

But again, if he's betting $20k on Ewers under in yards because he knows he's playing the entire 2nd half instead of Ewers then he should be blackballed from the sport right?

---

Is anyone arguing that he shouldn’t be?

At what point, ever, has “but they’re doing it to” made whatever illegal thing you’ve been caught doing less illegal?

I had a strange feeling this was going to happen. He’s a great player but MLB doesn’t value his measureables at all.

This is HUGE

quote:

---

Had all that happened while he was still in college, no I don't think he'd have kept playing college football, so what point do you think you're trying to make here?

---

Consider the source. A point isn’t being made, it’s purely a troll account.

quote:

---

The NCAA should have been working on legitimate NIL 20 years ago like I told them to

---

:lol:

quote:

---

Under the league's bylaws and rules, expulsion requires a supermajority vote (typically 75%) from the disinterested members of the conference's Board of Directors. The bylaws broadly empower presidents to sanction or remove a member for engaging in actions that are deemed materially adverse to the best interests of the conference.

---

This is why I said in another thread that the conferences are the ones who will have to start policing themselves.

Every conference has some form of this, and they all need to make sure they have clear guidelines on when and how they can decline a university its portion of the revenue share.

Thats the only way this nonsense slows down.

So Texas Tech is just going to become a pariah over this dude, only for the CFP committee to leave them out anyway?

Seems intelligent.

quote:

---

That was 11 years ago...

---

A backwater Michigan judge obviously ruled the punter still had eligibility.

quote:

---

That situation could easily be in LSU's lap if Sorsby decided to come here... so there's no judgement from me.

---

Personally, I don’t want anyone with a gambling problem anywhere near LSU. It’s not going to go away.

quote:

---

There’s an easy solution to this problem. NCCA says Sorsby and Chambliss are ineligible, a judge says they aren’t. Let them play and state that any wins gained if those players participate are automatically vacated. They can play, but their teams are automatically ineligible for the conference championship and the CFP

---

NCAA can’t do that. They don’t run the CC or the CFP. This is why I said the conferences are going to have to start policing themselves.

The conferences are going to have to actually back the ineligible ruling and say that their banned from conference play and will forfeit any conference game that the player participates. Non-conference games would have to stand. Then the CFP committee needs to make a statement by honoring the record to include forfeitures.

The NCAA can’t do anything other then declare them ineligible and hope the conferences back their decision.

At that point the fight becomes with the conference, which is much messier for its members.

ETA: The conferences are also going to have to figure out how to hit them where it really hurts, their rev share.

Love Milam but he seems destined for a career grinding away in low-a ball. Maybe AA if he hits well enough.

It’d be awesome if he’d delay that for a year and come back.