Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:43782
Registered on:11/30/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Whoever tried to make this argument is stupid....

re: UConn 75 @ Purdue 60 Final - TBS

Posted by RB10 on 4/8/24 at 9:55 pm
Edey is done I think...

re: UConn 75 @ Purdue 60 Final - TBS

Posted by RB10 on 4/8/24 at 9:52 pm
Unless Edey heats up Purdue is going to get blown out. Even if he does they may still get blown out. UConn is just better AND they’re playing with more effort....

re: UConn 75 @ Purdue 60 Final - TBS

Posted by RB10 on 4/8/24 at 9:21 pm
Purdue better get Edey some help or the same thing is going to happen in the 2nd half. He’s going to get his, but UConn is fine with that. They’re making him work hard and he’s going to have seriously heavy legs the last 10 minutes....

re: UConn 75 @ Purdue 60 Final - TBS

Posted by RB10 on 4/8/24 at 8:58 pm
Edey has noticeably slowed down. Not good for Purdue....

re: UConn 75 @ Purdue 60 Final - TBS

Posted by RB10 on 4/8/24 at 8:48 pm
Edey is working harder than normal. No way he can do this for 40 minutes tonight. They’re going to have to give him a breather....
[quote]Every one in the off season and beginning of it.[/quote] :lol: Can you link anyone saying it?...
[quote]Went from supposed to be the best team ever to the worst.[/quote] Who said this was going to be the best team ever?...

re: Regional: 18 SEC wins

Posted by RB10 on 4/7/24 at 3:01 pm
[quote]Really hope you guy's math is right. Still - winning 12 of the remaining 18 SEC games will equal winning each of the six remaining series just to get to 15.[/quote] Only 4 SEC teams had 18 conference wins last season....

re: Final Four Thread

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 6:47 pm
NC State has had every opportunity to make this a close game, they’re missing pretty straight up layups ...

re: Was our SS good before we got him?

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 2:34 pm
He was a .960 fielder at South Carolina. Not sure what’s happened to him....

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 7:58 am
[quote]It’s the same group defending this team and Jay. [/quote] Yeah, and it’s the same group bashing this team and Jay that were doing it all the way through June of last year. :dunno:...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 1:19 am
[quote]Yeah it couldn’t possiblly be any of the guys hitting 100-150 points better than him[/quote] Maybe. Maybe it’s Herring with his sub 1.00 ERA. Were halfway through the season with no leadership and no clear leader in the clubhouse. Kind of proves my point. “Key contributor” isn’t ...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:58 am
[quote]Key contributor right?[/quote] Sure? I can’t pinpoint any single player that’s been “key” to the current run for this team. Can you? [quote]And I see you’ve learned well from Ell, hurling insults when you’ve run out of excuses[/quote] I’m sorry you didn’t realize that was in re...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:52 am
[quote]Do you think that Kling and Neal have lived up to the hype?[/quote] I’ve already said he hasn’t. But no matter how much it bothers you and the other retard, he’s the starting center fielder which makes him a contributor to the 2024 team....

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:51 am
[quote]And you answered a question that asked which players were KEY contributors on either team.[/quote] No. I answered a question that asked who were recruits out of high school that contributed to either season. That is a very specific question. [quote]None of the qualifiers that you’...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:42 am
[quote]That you refuse to admit that you listed them as key contributors.[/quote] Wrong. Dude said I claimed that were key LAST YEAR. I 100% said they were key contributors as JJ high school recruits, which is what that entire linked thread was about. Think about it. Who on the team was...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:35 am
[quote]What? It's literally my first post on this page. It's me saying that exact quote. You quoted and responded to it.[/quote] Because your first post that started all of this bullshite was that I said Kling and Neal were key contributors LAST YEAR. You then linked a post of me saying they were...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:33 am
[quote]You keep leaving out key. You responded to key. You said that he was a key contributor. By your metrics, anyone on the field who goes 0-4 with 4 k’s and 0 po’s in a team win is a key contributor [/quote] I responded to a specific question about Jay Johnson’s recruits out of high school. ...

re: Jay better figure it out

Posted by RB10 on 4/6/24 at 12:30 am
[quote]Yes, then you corrected me and I said "Ah shite I guess you’re right. My bad you are correct." once I realized you were talking about them being key contributors in a negative way.[/quote] Nothing even remotely close to this happened in this thread or the one you linked....