Started By
Message
re: LSU fans is the juice with the squeeze?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:00 pm to REBEL5 AC
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:00 pm to REBEL5 AC
quote:
One was too fat to get off the ground on a play that could have sent us to the national championship. The other made a couple of key catches and a couple of really costly drops. Enjoy russian roulette.
Personally don’t think either player plays or is needed to play for LSU to be successful
OM would have taken both back if they wanted to go there
0
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:00 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Well when the SEC puts on rules in that situation then we can have that conversation.
Yeah you definitely get sanctions and vacated wins for playing with an ineligible player
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:00 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
How many snaps you think Big Xav will get?
Zero, he hates Lane.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:01 pm to Champs
quote:
will be once we add #4 since 2000
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:02 pm to REBEL5 AC
quote:
One was too fat to get off the ground on a play that could have sent us to the national championship.
The other made a couple of key catches and a couple of really costly drops. Enjoy russian roulette.
That’s a long winded way to say one was All-Conference and the other will be backing up Trey’Dez Green.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:02 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
I need proof on that. I don’t think you are correct.
LINK
quote:
The temporary restraining order won last week lasts for 10 days. On Monday, Judge William Jordan will oversee the preliminary injunctive hearing in Baton Rouge. Should that injunction be granted in favor of the players versus the NCAA, Clayton believes all of the plaintiffs in the suit should be granted the opportunity to play without penalty.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:03 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
And legally he is due to the TRO. Keep up.
The NCAA has never declared him eligible they just are restrained from punishing it while the case is ongoing. They also cannot retroactively punish his participation while this is ongoing.
Conveniently the docket won’t clear out till around February.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:04 pm to ThePoo
quote:
The temporary restraining order won last week lasts for 10 days. On Monday, Judge William Jordan will oversee the preliminary injunctive hearing in Baton Rouge. Should that injunction be granted in favor of the players versus the NCAA, Clayton believes all of the plaintiffs in the suit should be granted the opportunity to play without penalty.
From the NCAA. This has nothing to do with the rules the SEC made public yesterday.
Even his lawyer is saying no one can stop them from competing. Ok the SEC never said they couldn’t compete or would punish the player. What they said was they would punish the school for playing them. That suit has nothing to do with what the SEC said yesterday.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:06 pm to 03 West CoChamps
This is fresh coming from a fan of a program who has literally told the NCAA to go frick themselves for months now
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:10 pm to geauxcoco
quote:
This is fresh coming from a fan of a program who has literally told the NCAA to go frick themselves for months now
Where did I say NCAA at all? We are talking the SEC punishing LSU. Not NCAA punishing the players or LSU.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:12 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
From the NCAA. This has nothing to do with the rules the SEC made public yesterday.
Even his lawyer is saying no one can stop them from competing. Ok the SEC never said they couldn’t compete or would punish the player. What they said was they would punish the school for playing them. That suit has nothing to do with what the SEC said yesterday.
It just depends on if the judge views the NCAA to be colluding with its member conferences to keep these kids from playing.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:12 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
2 options from here. Then the SEC appeals and there is a different judge. Potentially federal.
you have no idea how any of this works.Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:14 pm to 03 West CoChamps
I'm just going to throw it back at you....b/c OM is not out of the NCAA headlights yet and you know it.
Was it worth the squeeze to literally suit up a player this fall that is ineligible according NCAA rules? So we should fear the SEC more than the NCAA, is that what you are trying to teach us here? Cause, I don't. They are getting their asses sued left and right now.
Was it worth the squeeze to shove the middle finger in the NCAA's face when it came to the Clemson debacle?
Stop being an FN hypocrite. You have your own issue to worry about.
Was it worth the squeeze to literally suit up a player this fall that is ineligible according NCAA rules? So we should fear the SEC more than the NCAA, is that what you are trying to teach us here? Cause, I don't. They are getting their asses sued left and right now.
Was it worth the squeeze to shove the middle finger in the NCAA's face when it came to the Clemson debacle?
Stop being an FN hypocrite. You have your own issue to worry about.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:16 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
From the NCAA. This has nothing to do with the rules the SEC made public yesterday.
I never said that, I said if they lose that case the SEC rule passed this week is moot, the players wont be NCAA eligible, so an SEC rule means nothing
quote:If the SEC is sued and loses, they cannot punish the players or school, that is the point of the injunction. The OP said players sue SEC (which it appears it has) and they win, the players can play with no penalty
Ok the SEC never said they couldn’t compete or would punish the player
we are going in circles here
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:16 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
It just depends on if the judge views the NCAA to be colluding with its member conferences to keep these kids from playing.
Ok so they get a TRO against the SEC tomorrow. Cool. Then months from now SEC wins because they will. They have every right to make a bylaw and was voted on unanimously. The punishment will come later.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:17 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
It just depends on if the judge views the NCAA to be colluding with its member conferences to keep these kids from playing.
Yes it can and may be argued that the language of the injunction applies to conferences, arguing some antitrust violations
The SEC however will be sued outside court case likely, if this if they have not been already
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:25 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Ok so they get a TRO against the SEC tomorrow. Cool. Then months from now SEC wins because they will. They have every right to make a bylaw and was voted on unanimously. The punishment will come later.
Just like they will win against Chambliss next year. Also just like Chambliss, any TRO that’s granted will prohibit the SEC from retroactively punishing the player or the school.
It’s hilarious because these players are using the exact same method as Chambliss, but somehow Ole Miss fans are convinced this one will turn out differently from Chambliss.
They will have the exact same outcome one was or another.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:27 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Ok so they get a TRO against the SEC tomorrow. Cool. Then months from now SEC wins because they will. They have every right to make a bylaw and was voted on unanimously. The punishment will come later.
A TRO protects those involved from any penalty while under the TRO. Again, we're back to Ole Miss not receiving any penalties due to Trinidad playing under a TRO.
Otherwise, the NCAA could just vacate the wins of kids playing under a TRO, after the fact. It could also have postseason implications in those situations.
Y'all had Lane for 6 years, do you really think he's doing this for no reason or if he thinks the SEC has them over a barrel?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:31 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
This is why everyone hates yall.
No one thinks about yall at all
Your worst coach ever won a natty with us, and our new coach is the only thing that lended you hillbilly dry county having fricks any credibility to begin with.
Ole Miss pursued Wright after he was cut from an NFL team. If he showed interest in playing for yall instead of us youd be singing a different tune.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 5:36 pm to 03 West CoChamps
We really had no idea that collective fans and admin would go psycho when an eligible player said “judge says my class still has a year of eligibility” and came back to school.
Very much wish LSU had let another school be the first to take on this inevitability.
Very much wish LSU had let another school be the first to take on this inevitability.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News