Started By
Message

re: Looks like FSU and Clemson also want in

Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:37 pm to
Posted by GentleJackJones
Member since Mar 2019
4153 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:37 pm to
quote:


The SEC is concerned that streaming numbers for Clemson+Florida State don't bring what Oklahoma+Texas do.

Notre Dame is the only "free agent" left that would "add to the pot."



I agree. Geography is no longer an issue. Look at the distance between Texas and South Carolina, Oklahoma or Missouri and Florida.

Grab Notre Dame and Ohio State. Ohio State is deeply concerned with athletic success and would love to bury its rival in Michigan by fleeing to the much better and more successful SEC. Imagine an Ohio State-less Big Ten. It's basically a two-team contest between Wisconsin and Penn State. It would be a very crappy conference while Ohio State left for greener pastures.

ETA Just imagine the "blue blood" teams:

Alabama
Ohio State
Notre Dame
Florida
Georgia
Texas
LSU
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Auburn

It would be unreal.
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 3:39 pm
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
7450 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 3:48 pm to
It'll make Saturdays much more fun. No more watching LSU vs Mcneese or clemson roll through the weak arse ACC. I don't know what people are so concerned about
Posted by Tiger79
Zachary
Member since Apr 2009
7349 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:06 pm to
Ohio state ain't leaving the big ten they are basically guaranteed a playoff spot every year.
Posted by gerkin
Member since Sep 2011
1189 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:09 pm to
How would 18 teams possibly make sense?
Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
2435 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Ohio state ain't leaving the big ten they are basically guaranteed a playoff spot every year.



No, but the risk is on the recruiting angle. Elite kids will be a tougher sell playing in a vastly inferior league.

If Texas recruiting can take a hit (and it did when A&M joined), Ohio State will suffer the same fate if B1G doesn't adapt.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3672 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:14 pm to
I think this NIL stuff has a lot to do with the super conference. Once they kick the NCAA outh there will be rules governing this NIL stuff. I think that’s a huge part of it—the schools don’t like the wild Wild West side of this
Posted by ElRoos
Member since Nov 2017
7203 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:24 pm to
Might as well do away with conferences at that point.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167176 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Are these recent conference expansions and realignments along with NIL going to hurt or enhance the college football product?




If you want to watch pure college football where kids are still playing for the love of sports you better become an FCS and lower level fan.
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
4504 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:43 pm to
ACC is locked into a TV deal with ESPN until the mid 2030s. don't know why ACC schools would agree to something like that but it means FSU and Clemson cannot leave.

Posted by rjacksonmroctober
Member since Jun 2021
160 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:49 pm to
I don't believe it. Clemson is in a conference that they dominate and moving in the SEC they would suddenly become just another team in the SEC. FSU want's no part of the SEC. They can't win in the ACC, so imagine trying to win in the SEC! Dabo I'm sure wants no part of the SEC. He likes playing in a weak conference because it assures his team will be a part of the playoffs. Clemson could become irrelevant real fast if they join the SEC. The SEC is where the big dogs run and Clemson would only be a puppy if they joined.
Posted by BallsEleven
Member since Mar 2019
6163 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

CC is locked into a TV deal with ESPN until the mid 2030s. don't know why ACC schools would agree to something like that but it means FSU and Clemson cannot leave.


You realized they have been involved in every step of this right?
Posted by WhiskeyThief
Slidell
Member since Oct 2018
280 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 4:51 pm to
?
quote:

Even without OU and TX, no other conference could compare. I don't think this is a good idea. When is enough, enough?



It seems only after it’s too much.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67050 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:02 pm to
Time for the culling:
Go to a model of 48 teams in a breakaway playoff league. That’s 4 regional conferences of 12 teams a-piece. Each conference would have 2 divisions of 6 teams, play 8 conference games, have division champs meet in a conference championship game, have an optional cross-division rival, and an optional permanent OOC rival.

Pacific
West: USC, Stanford, Washington, UCLA, Oregon, Arizona St
East: Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech

Great Lakes
West: Iowa, Minnesota, Mizzou, Kansas, Mizzou, and (one of Iowa St, Kansas St, and Okie St)
East: Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan St, Ohio St, Indiana, Illinois

Atlantic
North: Notre Dame, Penn St, West Virginia, Boston College, Maryland, Syracuse
South: North Carolina, NC St, Virginia, Virginia Tech, South Carolina, Clemson

Gulf of Mexico
West: Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Miss St, Alabama, Auburn
East: Tennessee, Kentucky, Georgia, Florida, Florida St, Miami
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 5:03 pm
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19052 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

No way any other power 5 could compare the the SEC


So what do you get for that? A road 10x harder to the championship? Less money per school?

I believe the major schools are positioning to start their own league away from the NCAA governance. That is not necessarily a bad thing. NIL has broken the system.
Posted by r0cky1
Member since Oct 2020
3331 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:07 pm to
If Greg Sankey makes this happen, when does it end? Does he rebrand the sec and create his own version of the ncaa. College athletics will either be revolutionary or implode
Posted by ElderTiger
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2010
6987 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

LSU used to play Centenary in fb, iirc, Centenary had a 'ship back in 1927,


I’d have to research the name, but years ago I had a relative tell me that the best running back he ever saw play for a LA college was a guy from Centenary.
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:22 pm to
May as well add tOSU and WV too.

Rebrand to Super Elite Conference.
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 5:23 pm
Posted by Mats86
Member since Mar 2021
3584 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:47 pm to
They won the national championship in 2013 right? I know they fell off pretty quickly, and aren’t a very good team right now. But they have won a championship more recently than anyone else in the conference not named LSU or Alabama. It’s hard to use that argument against fla st while allowing Texas in. Who hasn’t been successful either. Fla st had a good rivalry going with Florida, there is some value in that.
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
19248 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 5:49 pm to
As some point we have to build a wall… right ?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21393 posts
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

I am not sure this helps playoff expansion. Who wants to see potentially 8 teams from the same conference play each other again. I know each conference team will not play one another each year but there will be a lot of rematches.


True, could easily play one team 3 times. Say the SEC west champ is LSU and has already played Florida and lost. Fl wins the east and LSU beats them in SEC championship. Obviously, Fl will make the college playoffs...game number 3.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter