kingbob
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Sorrento, LA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | student |
| Number of Posts: | 71579 |
| Registered on: | 11/5/2010 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Falcons 45 @ Saints 24 Final - ESPN
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 9:29 pm to jkylejohnson
At least Gleason’s got jokes.
I disagree. Atlanta is killing us on short yardage. Get 3, make it a 2 score game. It’s only the 3rd quarter.
I expected a 9-8/10-7 level team that would contend for a division title in a garbage division.
Great halftime show. Eric Church was kinda random
re: You’d figure the NFL wanted the Saints to win this one…
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 8:06 pm to DeathValley85
The NFL never wants the Saints to win.
re: Defensive holding on a running play? What?
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 8:05 pm to saintsfan1977
And here’s a phantom flag to save the falcons drive
re: Why are Democrats obsessed with destroying the country
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 6:28 pm to PsychTiger
Democrats are puppets of a transnational totalitarian elite who seek to abolish all borders, centralize all power within themselves, and then kill 98% of humanity.
re: Saints bar in Baton Rouge?
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 4:23 pm to ClintonTigerMS
Ivar’s, Smiling Dog, Brickyard, Danny’s, O’Hara’s, Pelican to Mars should all be decent spots to watch it. I don’t know what places will be truly hype, though.
Probably Castro or Ho Chi Minh
Best at what? Killing people? Destroying their countries? Surviving long enough to maintain control?
Rick Edmonds is a social conservative baptist preacher type. Older gentleman, big personality, has a long voting record at the state legislature. He’s a generic small town Louisiana guns and Jesus boomer republican.
Blake Miguez is an accomplished politician in the state legislature, but he’s from the Lafayette area. So, him running in this district is sorta a head scratcher. He has Trump’s backing, and is either late gen-x or early millennial depending on where you draw the line.
Larry Davis is another socially conservative baptist preacher type, but he’s only in his thirties, and is an African American who grew up in the LP burbs. He’s worked on a lot of campaigns for different republican politicians over the last 10 years, but I don’t recall him ever holding any prior elected office. He’s trying to brand himself as the “Louisiana First” candidate. I know Larry is hosting an event soon with James Fishback of Florida.
I am not familiar with the other candidates.
Blake Miguez is an accomplished politician in the state legislature, but he’s from the Lafayette area. So, him running in this district is sorta a head scratcher. He has Trump’s backing, and is either late gen-x or early millennial depending on where you draw the line.
Larry Davis is another socially conservative baptist preacher type, but he’s only in his thirties, and is an African American who grew up in the LP burbs. He’s worked on a lot of campaigns for different republican politicians over the last 10 years, but I don’t recall him ever holding any prior elected office. He’s trying to brand himself as the “Louisiana First” candidate. I know Larry is hosting an event soon with James Fishback of Florida.
I am not familiar with the other candidates.
re: Why are republicans so obsessed with trannys?
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 3:57 pm to CrimsonFever
People are more motivated by disgust than by fear, and the transgender issue tends to trigger a universal “ick” in conservatives.
The big reason is because of Title IX, though. College sports are a big deal as scholarships to play them exist as a massive pipeline for lower and middle class kids to get access to higher education. Women’s sports, thanks to title ix, tend to offer a lot more varied opportunities for women and have helped countless women become college educated who otherwise never would have been able to.
Men, on the flip side, tend to face much stiffer competition to get scholarships for a much smaller number of sports. So, there is an incentive for men who cannot get a scholarship in men’s sports (either because the competition is too fierce for them or because men’s scholarships for that sport are not offered where women’s are) to compete in women’s sports instead.
This was obviously against the rules and a complete violation of why women’s sports existed, but the transgender movement essentially created a loophole for men to take scholarship opportunities away from women. This upset a LOT of people despite it being a very rare occurrence. Few took issue with women competing in men’s sports. The standpoint being that if women were good enough to beat men for a roster spot, that they could have it. However, due to biology, it is assumed (and often confirmed by statistical fact) that women’s sports were significantly less competitive than men’s sports (ie, that the best male athletes would inevitably outperform the best female athletes in virtually any sport due to intrinsic biological differences between men and women).
Finally, there is the bathroom portion. Parents don’t feel comfortable with their daughters sharing their bathrooms with young men. The risks that creates simply by entertaining it under the best of situations is seen as unmanageable and wholly unnecessary.
Just like most anti-gay rhetoric is aimed at gay men, anti-trans rhetoric is aimed at trans women. Women who can pass as men, like lesbians, rarely illicit much outrage because it is seen as either less gross, or because it is less likely to present a social advantage.
The big reason is because of Title IX, though. College sports are a big deal as scholarships to play them exist as a massive pipeline for lower and middle class kids to get access to higher education. Women’s sports, thanks to title ix, tend to offer a lot more varied opportunities for women and have helped countless women become college educated who otherwise never would have been able to.
Men, on the flip side, tend to face much stiffer competition to get scholarships for a much smaller number of sports. So, there is an incentive for men who cannot get a scholarship in men’s sports (either because the competition is too fierce for them or because men’s scholarships for that sport are not offered where women’s are) to compete in women’s sports instead.
This was obviously against the rules and a complete violation of why women’s sports existed, but the transgender movement essentially created a loophole for men to take scholarship opportunities away from women. This upset a LOT of people despite it being a very rare occurrence. Few took issue with women competing in men’s sports. The standpoint being that if women were good enough to beat men for a roster spot, that they could have it. However, due to biology, it is assumed (and often confirmed by statistical fact) that women’s sports were significantly less competitive than men’s sports (ie, that the best male athletes would inevitably outperform the best female athletes in virtually any sport due to intrinsic biological differences between men and women).
Finally, there is the bathroom portion. Parents don’t feel comfortable with their daughters sharing their bathrooms with young men. The risks that creates simply by entertaining it under the best of situations is seen as unmanageable and wholly unnecessary.
Just like most anti-gay rhetoric is aimed at gay men, anti-trans rhetoric is aimed at trans women. Women who can pass as men, like lesbians, rarely illicit much outrage because it is seen as either less gross, or because it is less likely to present a social advantage.
re: French high school torched on fire with 100 students trapped inside this morning
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 2:36 pm to Wolfwireless
These aren’t “protests”. These are pogroms. These are North African Muslim immigrants forming mobs and attacking the white population by burning down schools and churches.
re: New Orleans asks Supreme Court to reject removal of Calvin Duncan’s seat as Orleans Clerk
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 2:25 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Can someone explain this situation like I’m 5
In every Parish except for New Orleans, there is a single “clerk of court” for said Parish. This is an elected position. However, New Orleans had a unique system where its civil court and criminal court was entirely separate with two distinct elected clerks of court to run them.
The state legislature decided to, by a legislative act, consolidate the two positions into one. However, between passing the law and the law going into effect, there were elections for the clerks of court. Because it was already known that the criminal clerk of court position was scheduled to be eliminated, almost no one bothered to run for it. However, one man, Calvin Duncan, did and won the election with over 60% of the votes cast.
When the law went into effect and consolidated the courts under one clerk, the governor appointed the winner of the civil clerk election to be the “new” clerk over all the courts. The criminal court clerk sued, claiming institutional racism and state level corruption. Meanwhile, the sitting Civil Clerk of court (a black woman) has not faced an election since 2018 (and has won unopposed in every election since).
Calvin has repeatedly lost in court as the legislature clearly has the power to both create and eliminate his position. With that said, personally, I think the most just outcome would be for Calvin Duncan and the civil clerk Chelsey Napoleon to have to run against her in a special election to decide who gets the top job. However, per the state constitution and the laws already passed, this step would be unnecessary.
re: Muslims deported from the US?
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 9:56 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
1. Do you want all non-citizen Muslims deported?
Yes
quote:
2. Do you want ALL Muslims, including citizens, deported?
Personally, yes. Politically, no. As in, I would personally enjoy the result hypothetically, but I would actually be appalled if our government actually followed through with a policy to do so, as I believe it would require some pretty blatant violations of our Constitution and founding principles as well as provide an incredibly slick slope towards much worse tyrannies.
re: Name My Band
Posted by kingbob on 10/5/26 at 9:21 am to FearlessFreep
The Resplendents
Dash to the Exit
Jerry At Ricks
Dash to the Exit
Jerry At Ricks
If the GOP loses the house or Senate, that will be a disaster. Personally, I think the GOP will maintain narrow majorities in both houses, but they were doing incredibly well before starting the Iran conflict.
quote:
How exactly is it disastrous?
As a direct result of the conflict, fuel prices have nearly doubled. That not great.
re: Do you support Trump employing a "boots on the ground" policy/strategy in Iran?
Posted by kingbob on 10/2/26 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
I would rather glass the country than waste lives trying to invade and occupy it.
And then the Germans voted for the Nazis for no reason at all…
Popular
0











