Which is a more legitimate natty: winning it in a Covid year or winning it with 2 losses?

quote:

---

I say going undefeated in a Covid year is way more legitimate.

---

Trick question ... every year, every sport only awards one Natty. If you get that trophy - you don't care about the circumstances. They only handed out one. You got it. Everybody else that year can suck it - and look at their empty hands. Everybody comparing year to year can safely be ignored ... while you polish your Natty.

quote:

---

The "Covid year" troll attempts would probably sting a lot more if we didn't have eleventy billion other titles to console ourselves with.

---

It was a Natty, right ? Then you polish that bitch to a high shine and put it in the trophy case, front and center, next to all the other Natty's.

Y'all need a wider shelf than most. More levels. Bigger glass. Congrats on a job well done.

To do any different would be an insult to the kids that won that Natty. They didn't invent Covid. They didn't have a damn thing to say about the reaction to it. Games were played, and they won enough of them to get that Natty. Same goes for a two loss team that gets the Natty. You got the Natty. Never apologize for getting the big prize at the end.

I don’t care if it’s 2 losses or 5 losses. If they are the best team, then they are national champions.

The trophy look pretty legit don’t it?

quote:

---

I don’t care if it’s 2 losses or 5 losses. If they are the best team, then they are national champions.

---

UGA was the best team in 2007 though.

Although the 2007 LSU team earned it in the craziest year of the sport, UGA seemed unstoppable at the end of the season.

Like Arkansas would ever compete in the East. Lol.

I was worried throughout the 2020 season. That we'd win that one and then we'd never heat the end of it from other SEC programs, particularly Bama.

quote:

---

Period. End of Discussion. End of thread.

---

WRONG!!