Started By
Message
Winningest SEC Teams by decade since 60s
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:25 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/7/26 at 12:26 pm
7
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:30 pm to Go Go Gata
Big 3
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:13 pm to TideSaint
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:15 pm to TideSaint
quote:
Big 3
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:25 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it.
And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:01 pm to Go Go Gata
Is there a trophy for that?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:50 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
We started the decade off 0-6 in the SEC in 1980 which hurt us as far as the entire decade. But from 83-89 we were the class of the league for sure. 4 titles in 7 seasons.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:05 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it.
And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.
Not sure I'd agree with that. Back in those days, winning a championship was more arbitrary. A weak schedule was helpful and bowl tie-ins/selections had a big influence on the voting outcome. Passing the eye test was important, because in the end it was a beauty contest. Votes still matter, but not nearly as much.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:03 pm to WG_Dawg
Well 80s Auburn did that (1983).
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:08 pm to Go Go Gata
No L3U? List is shite!!
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:09 pm to WG_Dawg
Great, now you 3 close your eyes and tug to your right
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:15 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it. And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.
We probably got boned in 83 so there’s that.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:50 pm to Go Go Gata
Why stop there? They played in 1950s too 
Posted on 8/4/26 at 11:50 am to Go Go Gata
HOLY THREAD RESURRECTION, BATMAN!!!
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:05 pm to Dawgs2122
1960's wins
Texas 86
Alabama 85
2000's
Texas 109
Florida 99
Texas 86
Alabama 85
2000's
Texas 109
Florida 99
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:14 pm to Go Go Gata
Since the SEC started in the early 30s...why did they stop in the 60's?
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:33 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
Since the SEC started in the early 30s...why did they stop in the 60's?
1930's - BAMA, LSU and UT tied for wins, but BAMA had the highest winning %.
1940's - UGA
1950's - Ole Miss
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:42 pm to Night Vision
BAMA is the only SEC team to win an SEC football title every decade since the league was created.
Also, the Tide won Southern Conf titles in 1924, 1925, 1926 and 1930.
Also, the Tide won Southern Conf titles in 1924, 1925, 1926 and 1930.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 2:48 pm to Night Vision
"Winningest SEC teams by decade (since 1960s)"
Based on the thread title, why omit UT, A&M & OU?
You have a rare talent for speaking at length without disturbing the facts.
Based on the thread title, why omit UT, A&M & OU?
You have a rare talent for speaking at length without disturbing the facts.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 3:05 pm to Bigbens42
quote:Probably? That was the biggest hose job against an SEC team in my lifetime.
We probably got boned in 83 so there’s that.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News