Started By
Message
re: Why do USC and UK have men's soccer teams?
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:43 am to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:43 am to Lonnie Utah
You being in a conference that had soccer and it being a cheap sport to maintain so it probably didn’t get cut is a stupid take? Y’all need to drop that acc Jan Brady schtick, like you said it was forever ago.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:48 am to Broadside Bob
In the opulent 80s, schools were ADDING women's sports about as fast as they could for Title IX. Guess as we've gotten so ridiculously opulent on football that it's no longer possible to maintain a balance by spending more on women.
Gotcha, I thought it was about equal representation of sports offered but it’s about spending
Gotcha, I thought it was about equal representation of sports offered but it’s about spending
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:53 am to Ron McKelvey
I'm really hoping that the SEC adds women's flag football soon. It has become very popular in the high schools. Do I want to watch this crap? Hell no, but it would free up schollys for Men's soccer.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:59 am to Bamajedi
quote:
I'm really hoping that the SEC adds women's flag football soon. It has become very popular in the high schools
NFL doing work
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:06 am to Ron McKelvey
Not sure..would think it is just a way to even out the ratio of Male-Female sports.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:18 am to Indefatigable
Title IX is not preventing any school from adding any sport. It’s just a matter of priorities and preferences.
Back to top

0





