Started By
Message

Why do USC and UK have men's soccer teams?

Posted on 7/8/26 at 11:55 pm
Posted by Ron McKelvey
Member since Jul 2026
26 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 11:55 pm
Serious question. No other teams in the SEC and it's not like soccer is big in those states.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141266 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 4:36 am to
Some schools aren't Neanderthals
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4306 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:28 am to
I’ve often wondered why more schools don’t have a soccer team. I don’t watch soccer or like soccer but it’s a growing sport in the US. I think it’s the fourth most played sport amongst American youth. It’s kinda strange more schools don’t.
Posted by Simple Solution
Member since Dec 2024
366 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:29 am to
The Big 4!
Posted by Serraneaux
South of 30a
Member since Mar 2014
22769 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:40 am to
Have you see their football teams?

lol
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4306 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:41 am to
Usce makes sense they came from the acc which sponsors soccer. I imagine it’s not an expensive sport to fund. Which brings me to my next question, Texas doesnt have soccer? That is very surprising to me being a sec newb and massive school that takes directors cup seriously
Posted by Lizardman2
Member since Jan 2024
2919 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Have you see their football teams?


This retard does it to himself, and it's hilarious!
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4306 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:29 am to
I shouldn’t but I give people benefit of the doubt with possible typos.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38447 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:37 am to
quote:

I’ve often wondered why more schools don’t have a soccer team

Title IX is the only thing keeping the SEC schools from having teams and immediately being competitive.
Posted by Cimarron
Member since Jun 2024
1189 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:38 am to
Good for them, and they're in good company. So do Princeton, UVA, Cornell, Stanford, Georgetown, Harvard, Yale, Cal and UCLA.
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
24301 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:40 am to
VU doesn't have a softball team.
Posted by bamabaseballsec
Member since Dec 2020
4306 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 8:30 am to
I’m kinda ignorant on those laws but why would that matter? Bc you’d have to add women soccer
Posted by Broadside Bob
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2012
1732 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 8:32 am to
IX reasons. USCs and Miss State have given up their men's cross country teams for the same reason.

In the opulent 80s, schools were ADDING women's sports about as fast as they could for Title IX. Guess as we've gotten so ridiculously opulent on football that it's no longer possible to maintain a balance by spending more on women.
Posted by byrt bulimia
Member since Oct 2015
62 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 8:42 am to
A reason not to have it. We don’t want to be like them.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7800 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 9:20 am to
SC's is indeed a carryover from the ACC tenure.

When we were independent, the team was still pretty successful, all things. Developed some legit USMNT players like Brad Guzan, Josh Wolff, and Clint Mathis.

But the program is in the doldrums right now. It had strong support when I was in undergrad, and I enjoyed going to games.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
35303 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Usce makes sense they came from the acc which sponsors soccer.


Stupid Take. Do you know when South Carolina left the ACC? Were you even alive?

Was soccer even invented that far back in history?
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
35303 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 9:32 am to
quote:

SC's is indeed a carryover from the ACC tenure.


Inaccurate. SC had been out of the ACC almost a decade when we started varsity Men's soccer. We left the acc in 1971 and didn't start men's soccer until 1978.

The real question to ask here is why the REST of the SEC doesn't have men's soccer?

The answer is, Title IX...
This post was edited on 7/9/26 at 9:33 am
Posted by Capn_Bevo
Austin
Member since Jan 2019
1489 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:

I’ve often wondered why more schools don’t have a soccer team. I don’t watch soccer or like soccer but it’s a growing sport in the US. I think it’s the fourth most played sport amongst American youth. It’s kinda strange more schools don’t.
Title IX. We need to find a way to make men's soccer a scholarship sport everywhere.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
7800 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Inaccurate. SC had been out of the ACC almost a decade when we started varsity Men's soccer. We left the acc in 1971 and didn't start men's soccer until 1978


Ah, good to know. I was, indeed, unaware of this.

Hate that Annan was retained. He's done nothing to build off of Berson's tenure, even though that had stagnated.
Posted by TDCat
Louisville
Member since Oct 2013
1770 posts
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

it's not like soccer is big in those states.


Can't speak for SC but it's a big sport in KY. Coached a club team in the 80's and there were enough travel teams in state to have a league and it's grown since then.

Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter