| Favorite team: | Texas A&M |
| Location: | Wichita Falls, Texas |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | baseball |
| Occupation: | Attorney |
| Number of Posts: | 3020 |
| Registered on: | 7/28/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: As the Bayou burns
Posted by twk on 8/26/26 at 1:44 pm to Serraneaux
I think we determined last year that the name for this soap opera was to be "As the Roux Burns..."
quote:quote:He voted no during the first round of voting and wasn’t the only one. Probably felt like he needed to pick and choose his battles wisely and voted yes the second round. They’re on the same page, don’t you worry.
How did LSU’s president vote yes yesterday and Kiff is doing his own thing? Seems they aren’t on the same page.
It went something like this:
quote:I think LSU will back off before it comes to that, as evidenced by the vote (which was unanimous in the same sense that the vote to permit Texas and OU to join was unanimous).
All SEC presidents and AD's agreed to the SEC rules yesterday and gave Sankey authority enforce the rule. Verge Ausberry and Wade Rousse represent LSU and they agreed to the terms and rules set by the conference
re: Why does the SEC and other conferences…
Posted by twk on 8/26/26 at 8:36 am to NewBeginnings
All the eligibility rulings against the NCAA have been based upon anti-trust laws, which turn upon the fact that the NCAA is a monopoly. Conferences are not monopolies, so anti-trust laws, properly applied (which isn't a given in Louisiana judge) would not be implicated when conferences set eligibility rules.
Ultimately, if the schools are united in stopping this, they have the leverage to do so. All they have to do is tell LSU that they won't travel to Baton Rouge to play LSU if LSU is using NFL players. A local Baton Rouge judge would have no power to compel them to do so, and the financial loss for LSU would be catastrophic.
Ultimately, if the schools are united in stopping this, they have the leverage to do so. All they have to do is tell LSU that they won't travel to Baton Rouge to play LSU if LSU is using NFL players. A local Baton Rouge judge would have no power to compel them to do so, and the financial loss for LSU would be catastrophic.
re: Of these 18 college football teams, how many have you seen play in person?
Posted by twk on 8/26/26 at 7:35 am to saturdaysarebetter
I haven't seen Michigan or USC in person (16/18). I haven't been to FSU, Ohio State or Penn State, either (so, 13/18).
re: Since LSU likes the paint their field with 5-yard intervals
Posted by twk on 8/16/26 at 1:25 pm to LSU Grad Alabama Fan
Petty…but I like it. :lol:
re: Who remembers the old Kickoff Classic and Pigskin Classic games?
Posted by twk on 8/12/26 at 1:22 pm to AUTiger789
I saw the '98 Kickoff Classic in New Jersey, where FSU beat A&M. My only trip to New York, so far. Saw a game at Yankee Stadium, and a lot of the tourist sites, Sort of regret not going up to the top of the World Trade Center when I had the chance, but we weren't standing in line for anything, given our limited time.
re: LSU Ranked last in SEC - Tuition
Posted by twk on 8/12/26 at 12:45 pm to DarthRebel
So few out of state students get in at A&M and Texas, I don't know that those numbers really mean much. Here's the rankings strictly based on in-state rates:
1. VANDERBILT Cost of attendance: $99,994 (private)
2. OKLAHOMA Cost of attendance: $58,823 (in-state, $40,145)
3. AUBURN Cost of attendance: $63,540 (in-state, $39,516)
4. KENTUCKY Cost of attendance: $60,838 (in-state, $38,344)
5. MISSOURI Cost of attendance: $59,232 (in-state, $36,070)
6. ALABAMA Cost of attendance: $60,400 (in-state, $35,392)
7. TEXAS Cost of attendance: $72,916 (in-state, $35,386)
8. MISSISSIPPI STATE Cost of attendance: $53,422 (in-state, $34,431)
9. ARKANSAS Cost of attendance: $56,256 (in-state, $33,988)
10. OLE MISS Cost of attendance: $52,938 (in-state, $32,148)
11. SOUTH CAROLINA Cost of attendance: $57,412 (in-state, $31,602)
12. TEXAS A&M Cost of attendance: $60,480 (in-state, $30,320)
13. TENNESSEE Cost of attendance: $49,672 (in-state, $30,212)
14. GEORGIA Cost of attendance: $52,156 (in-state, $29,920)
15. LSU Cost of attendance: $45,446 (in-state, $28,770)
16. FLORIDA Cost of attendance: $54,010 (in-state, $25,830)
1. VANDERBILT Cost of attendance: $99,994 (private)
2. OKLAHOMA Cost of attendance: $58,823 (in-state, $40,145)
3. AUBURN Cost of attendance: $63,540 (in-state, $39,516)
4. KENTUCKY Cost of attendance: $60,838 (in-state, $38,344)
5. MISSOURI Cost of attendance: $59,232 (in-state, $36,070)
6. ALABAMA Cost of attendance: $60,400 (in-state, $35,392)
7. TEXAS Cost of attendance: $72,916 (in-state, $35,386)
8. MISSISSIPPI STATE Cost of attendance: $53,422 (in-state, $34,431)
9. ARKANSAS Cost of attendance: $56,256 (in-state, $33,988)
10. OLE MISS Cost of attendance: $52,938 (in-state, $32,148)
11. SOUTH CAROLINA Cost of attendance: $57,412 (in-state, $31,602)
12. TEXAS A&M Cost of attendance: $60,480 (in-state, $30,320)
13. TENNESSEE Cost of attendance: $49,672 (in-state, $30,212)
14. GEORGIA Cost of attendance: $52,156 (in-state, $29,920)
15. LSU Cost of attendance: $45,446 (in-state, $28,770)
16. FLORIDA Cost of attendance: $54,010 (in-state, $25,830)
quote:Went to Italy last May. You'll love it.
It's the expense, not the hassle.
I have a family of five. Tickets and concessions are expensive, yo. And I make very good money. I don't know how people do it on the regular.
My wife and I are planning a trip to Italy later this year. The plane tickets and hotel reservations are not much more than a season of football tickets.
For me, I'm single, so tickets and concessions are not that big of a deal. It's the travel cost that would absolutely eat me alive if I didn't have a friend who lets me stay at her house. Of course, I do give her a ticket to any game she wants to attend, so it's not totally free, but it's still a heck of a deal when you live four hours away and have season tickets for football and baseball.
re: Remember the fist SEC game on CBS
Posted by twk on 8/10/26 at 9:59 am to TheTideMustRoll
quote:The fact that some folks are downvoting this just goes to show how stupid people can be.
Y'all can reminisce over CBS all you like but ABC/ESPN has been a vastly superior product. It's been great getting high-quality conference games in the 11:00, 2:30, and 6:30 timeslots every week, rather than getting a terrible 11:00 game, all the good games simultaneously at 2:30, and a second-rate late game most weeks.
The government is already knee deep in this, through the courts and their interpretation of the anti-trust laws. As much of a Rube Goldberg contraption as this bill may be, the overriding goal is to get the government (courts) OUT of college sports, and an act of Congress is the only way to do that. You can stand on the sidelines and criticize all you like, but doing nothing is effectively saying that the you the mess that has been created by the courts interpreting anti-trust laws passed in the 19th century.
re: WTF Florida? Sumrall is taking up Lanes headline grabbing slack.
Posted by twk on 7/30/26 at 10:26 am to Sleepy_Tiger
Dan Orlovsky must not have any really old male relatives. When he reaches the point where he can no longer cut his own toenails (and if you live long enough, there's a good chance that will happen to you, as my 98 year old father can attest for the last 3 years), he will have to eat those words. Now, why Sumrall needs them now, I can only imagine. :lol:
For football, all save Kentucky and Vandy
For baseball, all save Auburn, Ole Miss, and UT.
For baseball, all save Auburn, Ole Miss, and UT.
re: Is all this dust coming from Norman?
Posted by twk on 7/27/26 at 7:48 am to Yukons Worst
When I have time on a trip from my home (Wichita Falls) to Norman, I like to stop off at the Meers Store in the Wichita Mountains. The burgers are huge, but the huge bowl of peach cobbler is the real attraction in my mind.
I once spent six years in exile behind the Pine Curtain in Marshall, Texas. I had a magnolia tree in my yard and am convinced that the leaves of the magnolia tree served as the inspiration for whoever invented vinyl.
quote:Best guess: Texas didn't want the end with the tunnel. They have to give OU a few hundred seats in the north endzone to compensate, and I would imagine that the OU fans who get those seats aren't necessarily excited about being stranded in a sea of burnt orange.quote:I've always wondered why it is what it is. Naturally you'd think Texas would sit on the south side and Oklahoma the north.
However I'd be curious if any Texas fans have any stories about why the Cotton Bowl seating is the way it is and always has been.
I'm curious the reason as well.
quote:The big black mark against Williams-Brice is its off campus location. Still a good road trip (good places to stay and eat downtown), but if just road tripping to see great college experiences, I would have it lower on the list than it might otherwise be due to being located in the middle of the fairgrounds in an unattractive part of town.
South Carolina needs to be on the list. It is perennially under rated as a stadium experience. And in the last 15 years they've made very significant improvements to the tailgate scene around the stadium. And unless you are a UGA or Clemson visiting fan, they are very friendly and courteous.
re: SEC expected to adopt pickoff limitations & minimum # of batters a pitcher must face
Posted by twk on 7/16/26 at 9:56 am to lsufball19
quote:I would be interested in seeing the data from this year. My personal experience tells me that while the pitch clock worked to bring game times down initially, they have been creeping back up. As I pointed out in my prior response, pick off moves are now being used as a work around to circumvent the pitch clock, and the trend just keeps getting worse. The limit will stop that.
Can’t find data from this year but the year the pitch clock was added, the average length of SEC games was 2 hours 49 minutes. That was down 21 minutes from the previous year
What takes the most time isn’t the pitching changes. It’s the reviews taking so long. They’ve already capped mound visits, added pitch clocks, and pitching changes are limited to 90 seconds from the time the coach starts walking to the mound. They also made run rules mandatory in SEC games.
The three batter minimum for pitchers is dumb at the college level. And limiting pickoff attempts is just inviting easy stolen bases, which results in more runs, and longer innings
Pitching changes take up a huge amount of time. No one comes to the park to see the coach make pitching changes.
While replay takes up time, it has all but eliminated the long arse, deranged arguments that used to be common, so I think that just about is a wash.
quote:Since the adoption of the pitch clock, a lot of "pick off moves" have been merely done to reset the clock. When you pick with a catcher virtually standing on the bag, you're just trying to reset the clock. It got ridiculous at times this year. The two pick limit will eliminate that.
Endlessly trying to pick off a guy seems to usually result in a stolen base.
re: For those that care about baseball…how did your school do w/ your class & MLB Draft?
Posted by twk on 7/13/26 at 8:08 am to Russianblue
quote:This. The Athletic had an article last week about the recruiting class of 2023. Maybe half of the top 20 prospects that made it to campus had careers that more or less fulfilled expectations, and the top college draft prospects in this years’s draft largely came from outside the top ranks of recruiting.
nobody knows what the’ve got until the games are played. throw a freakish 2026 Oklahoma-like run into the mix and now more than ever, winning a CWS is one part talent, one part coaching and two or three or four parts Baseball Gods.
re: Why do USC and UK have men's soccer teams?
Posted by twk on 7/10/26 at 7:44 am to UKWildcats
quote:Wild arse guess, but I'm thinking that once UK added women's basketball, gym space was the issue. Soccer can be played and practiced just about out in a pasture.
Apparently we had an excellent wrestling team back in the day before Title IX. Why that went bye bye and soccer came along, I have no idea. I'm sure men's soccer got added years after Title IX in order to accommodate the addition of a woman's sport, and they thought soccer is growing and it made more sense than bringing back wrestling. I have no idea.
Popular

0











