Started By
Message

re: What is the Most Mismanaged Football Program in the SEC?

Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
28237 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

I'd argue if the accepted culture is average, and they continue to manage to be average then they are not mismanaged.


Their culture mismanages their tremendous resources advantages.
Posted by Lizardman2
Member since Jan 2024
2371 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:10 pm to
A&M

They are top 5 in NIL money spent, with absolutely zero to show for it.
Posted by TAMU-93
Sachse, TX
Member since Oct 2012
1155 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:16 pm to


Total football spending taken from Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database.
Posted by Bill Parker?
Member since Jan 2013
5179 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:19 pm to
Auburn will be in much better shape on August 1st.

Oh shite. It's Auburn.
Posted by Tiger_Claw
Little Rock, AR
Member since Nov 2013
6910 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:52 pm to
This is an interesting question, and lots of folks have their opinions, but let's actually look at the facts to get ourselves to the most accurate answer.

Historical Success vs Current Reality:

- 21 ten-win seasons (3rd most in SEC history)
- 1998 National Champions
- Last SEC Championship Game: 2007 (17 years ago!)
- Only 3 ten-win seasons since 2008

Massive Resources Wasted:

- Major state university with huge fanbase
- 102,455-seat stadium
- Prime recruiting territory
- $52.5M annual SEC revenue sharing

Coaching Carousel of Disasters:

- Lane Kiffin (2009): Left after 1 year for USC
- Derek Dooley (2010-2012): 15-21 record, multiple embarrassments
- Butch Jones (2013-2017): "Champions of Life" became a punchline
- Jeremy Pruitt (2018-2020): Fired for NCAA violations
- 6 coaches in 16 years = zero stability

The Damning Evidence:

- Went from consistent top-10 program to SEC mediocrity
- Multiple coaching hires that set program back years
- NCAA violations under Pruitt
- Recruiting classes destroyed by constant turnover
- Administrative instability and booster interference

Why not Texas A&M? They're newer to SEC (2012) and still building.
Why not Arkansas? Smaller resources, more realistic expectations.
Why not South Carolina? Limited historical success to begin with.

BOTTOM LINE: Tennessee had everything - history, resources, fanbase, location - and systematically destroyed it through 15+ years of terrible decisions. No other SEC program has fallen so far from such heights.

Heupel is showing promise, but one good coach doesn't erase a decade and a half of institutional mismanagement!

So...congratulations to the Tennessee Volunteers!!!!!!!



Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
9471 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Who had the worst ROI?


Easily A&M, they're still paying Jimbo, and bragged about all that oil money going to recruits without any championships
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
10096 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

The answer has to be Auburn


As an outsider, I've never understood how Auburn has managed to be competitive at all.

I mean - everybody in that state is a Bama fan. And then hop over the line and everybody is a Georgia fan.

I tip my hat to Auburn for even making The Iron Bowl a thing. Shite, they're not even named after a state...!? I don't see how they even have a chance, but they've far outdone what should be first glance expectation.
Posted by menu2
Member since Apr 2025
1507 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

2021 - TAM 8-4; Auburn 6-7
2022 - TAM 5-7; Auburn 5-7
2023 - TAM 7-6; Auburn 6-7
2024 - TAM 8-5; Auburn 5-7
Dang I had I no idea it’s been this consistently bad at Auburn lately

Reminds me of Charlie Strong, which was far and away the darkest period for Texas
Posted by MtVernon
Member since Jul 2024
10096 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Reminds me of Charlie Strong, which was far and away the darkest period for Texas


What you say is true - but I blame all that on the Steve Patterson era. Now that guy was a kunt, and is truly the poster child for the darkest days of UT Athletics.
Posted by Monahans
Member since Sep 2019
2099 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 3:04 pm to
It’s gotta be A&M. They’ve spent an insane amount on NIL with nothing to show for it and got completely bent over in the Jimbo contract. Elko was a pedestrian hire after all of it.
Posted by FireDanMullen
Member since Dec 2020
4382 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:07 pm to
Florida and it isn’t close

For everyone pointing to Auburn - Auburn has been a consistent program in the SEC but has never had elite success over multiple years. They have 1 championship in the last 60 years.

Florida had 3 championships in 12 years from 96-2008. Something only Miami, Bama, and Nebraska have accomplished in the last 50 years. The concept Florida cannot maintain playing for championships or even being Mark Richt at Georgia level consistent shows a colossal mismanagement.
Posted by Go Go Gata
Member since Oct 2016
4008 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:12 pm to
A&M
Florida
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted by SL Xpress
Member since Mar 2023
368 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:35 pm to
So if it's a program that has always been mismanaged then the mismanagement becomes normalized and no longer counts?

I think it's hilarious that A&M's historic lack of success is seen as beneficial in terms of their recent lack of success.
Posted by lagniappe09
Northshore
Member since Jul 2009
632 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:37 pm to
I say A&M - with all of those resources ($) and facilities
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
19311 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:40 pm to
That chart answers the question.
Posted by Colonel Ingus
Houston
Member since Nov 2021
5599 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Then you add the $500 million stadium upgrade. The overall football facilities upgrade.

How is that “mismanaging a program”? Nobody really regrets upgrading the stadium or facilities.

If a donor wants to give $20 million of his hard earned money to put his name on the side of a building, you let him.

The Fisher contract was 100% mismanagement. However, everything else I would more so call “underachievement” vs. “mismanagement”.
Posted by FireDanMullen
Member since Dec 2020
4382 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

So if it's a program that has always been mismanaged then the mismanagement becomes normalized and no longer counts? I think it's hilarious that A&M's historic lack of success is seen as beneficial in terms of their recent lack of success.


Good point. One may just call it cursed. There’s about a dozen schools with realistic chances of competing for national titles with the resources available that it takes to actually win championships. A&M is one of them with the ability to have resources and whatever else you want to call it, they are just cursed lol
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
26522 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:01 pm to
God hates their yell leaders.
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
26649 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:17 pm to
Arkansas
Auburn
A&M

In no order.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
54747 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:54 pm to
He's an old man that has nothing.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter