FireDanMullen

quote:

---

How is Texas the most overrated when there is Oregon, atm, etc out there? At least we have beaten quality opponents

---

You lost to 2 awful teams. You were a consensus top 5 team and had 2 losses by week 7. Including to a horrendous Oklahoma team and a bad Florida team. You are severely overrated.

Thus far, Ohio state and Texas.

None of it matters though bc Ohio state could probably lose a 3rd game and still make the playoffs.

quote:

---

They were incoming 5 star prospects. They honestly didn't require a lot of coaching up. Alabama loaded up on talent.

---

Lmao more 3 star players go to the NFL than 5 star players.

I see we’re just talking out of our arse now for the sake of how your team is performing?

I am a Florida fan, we haven’t been relevant in 15 years I have no dog in this fight other than I like watching quality football.

No one with eyes and a degree of objectivity can sit here and tell you the quality of play in college football hasn’t gone down but ok man your 24 year old QB has your school in the best spot they’ve been in for the last 70 years so the whole sport is better off lmao got it

quote:

---

Not obvious at all. Games are only 12-15 days a year. A player coached by Nick Saban the other 350 days will come out ahead of someone coached by a lesser staff more often than not.

---

^ this. People don’t understand quality over quantity.

quote:

---

Taking players off the bench at Bama and putting them on the field starting......improves the level of play.....obviously. I mean you just replaced a lower level player with a better one....who wasn't playing for anyone. This isn't rocket surgery. Playing in games is better than not playing in games for a players actual development. Obviously. Being able to find passed over gems at lower levels or at the G5 and have them transfer in to improve higher level programs helps elevate the play.....obviously.

---

Right and every coach across the board has said the level of play has gone drastically down. Anyone with eyes can see that

If you really think the Indiana team with 4 players taken in the first 3 rounds and never lost a game last season could play on the same field with Georgia 2021 or 2022 with 5 players taken in the first round alone or Alabama 2020 I don’t know what to tell you. You can make an argument for parity, making an argument for better overall play is laughable at best. The play quality is awful objectively.

You are obviously stoked bc ole miss is great with a great 24 year old QB. Congrats. I’m not mad about it. But to argue that this quality of football is better is just lying to what your eyes are watching. This shite sucks. The product on the field is garbage. I have no dog in this fight either. Florida hasn’t been relevant in 15 years. The product is just objectively awful. No matter what you want to tell yourself. The smartest coaches in the profession disagree with you.

quote:

---

Maybe letting 23 year olds play in college actually improves the level of play. Maybe?

---

Maybe if that was my point. It wasn’t so I’ll explain.

No teams have real depth anymore. So 1, you cannot practice at the level of intensity that really good teams did. So iron isn’t sharpening iron anymore because you cannot risk injuries and because the “2nd string” cornerback who gets on the field 40% of the snaps and is a big contributor at the star position is now at another school bc he’s getting paid more.

The quality of play is seriously down across the board because there is 0 continuity and depth , which is what builds teams. You get better teams when they have multiple good players making each other better. You get better players and teams when a kid doesn’t bounce around 4 programs in 4 years. Your self indulgent theory that the sole aspect of 23 year old + players making the game better is solely based off having a super star QB. Which is totally not relevant to the entire landscape of college football quality of play going down. And for the record there’s no problem with having 23 year old+ players. That’s not what I’m talking about at all.

quote:

---

The actual quality on the field is actually elevated.

---

Lmao. Ok dude. This is an egregious logic stretch that every coach is disagreeing with but yeah bc your team has a great QB it means the quality of play is better lmao. Unreal

quote:

---

It’s hilarious that Bama & UGA fans are united on this front… Saban got out just at the right time but his long time bag man (Kirby) is still having to deal with it. It’s just so unfair and down right wrong.

---

Intelligent LSU fans are united on this as well. The quality of play fricking sucks.

College football dorks will tell you with a straight face this is a good thing because some teenager that couldn’t care less if you live or die tomorrow is now getting paid millions lmao

The sport sucks arse now. The entire quality is like watching glorified high school football

You’re never going to win a championship at Arkansas. Seems like the AD won’t ever commit to NIL. But if you brought in a service academy coach and ran a triple option offense you’d probably average between 5-7 to 8-4 seasons.

Which is way better than having the worst record in this conference since the expansion in 2012. (.408) win percentage.

I for one think it sucks Arkansas has fallen off a cliff. Would your fans be open to a service academy approach ?