Started By
Message
re: The only way to do the new divisions - Everything else is stupid
Posted on 8/21/21 at 12:23 am to Oilfieldbiology
Posted on 8/21/21 at 12:23 am to Oilfieldbiology
frick balance. Needs to be purely geographical or someone is getting help because they're terrible.
0
Posted on 8/21/21 at 12:36 am to picollo
Absolutely. Whether conference or pod if UT, AM, OU and Mizzou aren't together it's going to look like one of those schools is getting off easy.
It's not LSU's fault that them with the MS schools and Arky make the most sense geographically.
Rivalries are dying every year. New ones have to be made with the reshuffle.
If AM isn't with UT in a pod or conference they should be dogged for forever. I'll basically back UT over AM out of principle for that kind of weak shite.
It's not LSU's fault that them with the MS schools and Arky make the most sense geographically.
Rivalries are dying every year. New ones have to be made with the reshuffle.
If AM isn't with UT in a pod or conference they should be dogged for forever. I'll basically back UT over AM out of principle for that kind of weak shite.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 1:27 am to TigerLunatik
BAMA will never be in the East, never.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 3:04 am to Sao
quote:
Florida
Georgia
Auburn
Alabama
LSU
Texas
Aggy
OU
That would be like a top 12 game every week. Whoever won that division just give them the NC
Posted on 8/21/21 at 3:08 am to BamaWins15
quote:
BAMA will never be in the East, never
Yes you will
Posted on 8/21/21 at 3:19 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
9 game schedule every 8 years if there are. No permanent cross opponents. If you have a permanent one it’s back to every 16.
With Bama and Auburn in the east and a 9 game conference schedule there’s no need for permanent cross division games.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 9:24 am to labamafan
This is accurate. With a 9 game conference schedule, no need for perm rivals.
Not enough people realize that with UT/OU joining that other teams are going to get affected as well.
What was the outcry when Tulane and Georgia Tech left?
Not enough people realize that with UT/OU joining that other teams are going to get affected as well.
What was the outcry when Tulane and Georgia Tech left?
Posted on 8/21/21 at 9:29 am to ShowMeHorns
quote:
And pods make it highly likely you play a team 3 times in a year with a 12 team playoff...I'm a no on pods
For Texas, that would happen how often? Once every 40 years?
This post was edited on 8/21/21 at 9:31 am
Posted on 8/21/21 at 9:30 am to wesman21
quote:
This is accurate. With a 9 game conference schedule, no need for perm rivals.
The only cross rival left out is LSU vs Florida and no cajun honestly wants this to continue even now.
But at least 9 conference games is a must to weed through 16 teams.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 9:32 am to bamameister
Don’t speak for us, Gump.
You hillbillies have been holding progress up for 30 years because of your nobody G’sAF rivalry.
You hillbillies have been holding progress up for 30 years because of your nobody G’sAF rivalry.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 9:38 am to bamameister
The rivalries are dying.
Have to create new geographic ones.
The nonsense of moving teams around for whatever reason- balance, history, is over.
Draw a line down AL/MS and that is your two division conference. OR something similar with pods.
The one thing I think shouldn't happen under any circumstance are in state teams. NO way you split up UT/AM. That looks weak as shite.
Have to create new geographic ones.
The nonsense of moving teams around for whatever reason- balance, history, is over.
Draw a line down AL/MS and that is your two division conference. OR something similar with pods.
The one thing I think shouldn't happen under any circumstance are in state teams. NO way you split up UT/AM. That looks weak as shite.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 10:14 am to Landmass
This is what I proposed back in July:
quote:
8 west
8 east
7 games in division
4 games in other division (rotates to where you play every non-division team every 2 years) - NO PERMANENT OPPONENTS are necessary because the real ones will be within the divisions)
1 non-conference, Ga/Ga. Tech, USCe/Clemson, Fla/FSU, etc.
Back to top ReplyEditRequest AdminReplies (0)
up vote0down vote0
coachcrisp
Alabama Fan
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
23613 posts
Online
Here's what it'll look like:
West: Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M
East: Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee and Vanderbilt
PS- another plus is all the games will have some significance....none of that Akron or Alabama STATE crap!
quote:
8 west
8 east
7 games in division
4 games in other division (rotates to where you play every non-division team every 2 years) - NO PERMANENT OPPONENTS are necessary because the real ones will be within the divisions)
1 non-conference, Ga/Ga. Tech, USCe/Clemson, Fla/FSU, etc.
Back to top ReplyEditRequest AdminReplies (0)
up vote0down vote0
coachcrisp
Alabama Fan
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
23613 posts
Online
Here's what it'll look like:
West: Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M
East: Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee and Vanderbilt
PS- another plus is all the games will have some significance....none of that Akron or Alabama STATE crap!
Posted on 8/21/21 at 6:30 pm to coachcrisp
I would rather drop cupcake games and play as many games in conference to keep just two divisions. If we go to pods, it will end most years in controversy than not. Are we going to do a 3 game conference championship? Pods are stupid and anyone for them hasn't thought about all the problems that pods would bring.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:09 pm to auburn22
quote:This is what I think is the best setup, they may do away with the Conference championship if moving to a 12 team playoff
LSU
A&M
Miss St.
Ole Miss
Texas
Oklahoma
Arkansas
Missouri
Auburn
Alabama
Tenn.
Vandy
Georgia
Florida
USC
Kentucky
Play your 3 division game and 6 others. In 4 years you play at every school's place and they come to you.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:18 pm to schmoo
quote:
This is what I think is the best setup, they may do away with the Conference championship if moving to a 12 team playoff
I would be ok with pods if there was a 12 team playoff and no CCG
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:22 pm to auburn22
This would be the most sensible way to do it so expect this to get canned.
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:30 pm to Sao
quote:
South Carolina
Tennessee
Kentucky
Arkansas
Missouri
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Mississippi State
Vandy could win that!
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:35 pm to schmoo
quote:
LSU
A&M
Miss St.
Ole Miss
Texas
Oklahoma
Arkansas
Missouri
I can see this
quote:
Auburn
Alabama
Tenn.
Vandy
Georgia
Florida
USC
Kentucky
No real way of not stepping on toes of charter members and rivals
Georgia v Auburn
KY vs Tenn
KY vs VU
FL vs TN
SC + AL + AU + GA
UT + UK + VU + UF
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:37 pm to Landmass
quote:
Texas A&M
Mizzou
Texas
Oklahoma
FML
Posted on 8/21/21 at 7:40 pm to auburn22
quote:
LSU
A&M
Miss St.
Ole Miss
Texas
Oklahoma
Arkansas
Missouri
Auburn
Alabama
Tenn.
Vandy
Georgia
Florida
USC
Kentucky
Play your 3 division game and 6 others. In 4 years you play at every schools place and they come to you.
This makes the most sense. But auburn and UGA hate it.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News