Started By
Message

re: The Inadvertent Whistle Call Last Night

Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:16 am to
Posted by tigerforever7
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2012
1047 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:16 am to
I did not understand how they decided to “replay the down” but then could still go back and have a replay to change the outcome of the down. If they decide to “replay the down due to an error whistle” then the play technically never happened, right?

How the refs went about the whole situation was pretty shitty too.
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 8:21 am
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
4465 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:20 am to
A team can be awarded the ball after a fumble recovery and an inadvertent whistle was blown IF there was an immediate recovery as part of the flow of the play.

Part of the decision to award the ball to MSU was that there was an immediate recovery. It was not an immediate recovery as part of the flow of the play in my opinion. After the ball was dropped, you can see both an MSU and Ole Miss player near the play pull up and more or less just stand there. It’s those two players that would have met the definition of immediate recovery if they kept playing. Each one had equal opportunity to recover the ball. Another MSU player not near the play trots over and timidly picks up the ball. It was not part of the flow of the play and was not an immediate recovery in my opinion.

To have been fair on the screw up, Ole Miss could have kept the ball but lose the down and distance and spot the ball where it was dropped.
Posted by tigerforever7
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2012
1047 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:23 am to
I agree there was not an immediate recovery. Mingo obviously stopped playing because the whistle, allowing the Miss. State player easy access to recover the fumble. Without the whistle, the outcome could definitely have been different.
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 8:24 am
Posted by REBEL5 AC
Member since Sep 2012
14701 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:23 am to
That’s what I said. Felt like the fair call was 2nd and 12/13
Posted by OeauxMy
Member since Feb 2017
260 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:26 am to
Here is the rule and exception. It says Immediate continuing action. At game speed nothing looked like immediate with that “recovery”.

Live Ball Becomes Dead
ARTICLE 2. a. A live ball becomes a dead ball as provided in the rules or when an official sounds their whistle (even though inadvertently) or otherwise signals the ball dead (A.R. 4-2-1-II and A.R. 4-2-4-I).
b. If an official sounds their whistle inadvertently or otherwise signals the ball
dead during a down (Rules 4-1-3-k, m and n) (A. R. 4-1-2-I-V):
1. When the ball is in player possession, the team in possession may elect to put the ball in play where declared dead or repeat the down.
2. When the ball is loose from a fumble, backward pass or illegal pass, the team in possession may elect to put the ball in play where
possession was lost or repeat the down (Exception: Rule 12-3-3-d).

ARTICLE 3. Reviewable plays involving potential dead balls and loose balls include:
a. Loose ball by a potential passer ruled a fumble.
b. Loose ball by a passer ruled incomplete forward pass when there is clear
recovery or the ball goes out of bounds in the immediate continuing action after the loose ball.

1. If the replay official does not have indisputable video evidence as to
which team recovers, does not have confirmation of the recovery by the officials on the field, or the ball going out of bounds, the ruling of incomplete pass stands.
2. If the replay official rules fumble and the ball is recovered, the ball belongs to the recovering team at the spot of the recovery and any advance is nullified
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 8:29 am
Posted by 1loyalbamafan
alabama
Member since Mar 2015
2688 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:28 am to
quote:

the rules provided for this situation, which we have seen before. the correct call was to call it a fumble, and award the ball to the team who picked it up.


That is how they explained it on tv. That the team recovering the lateral could not advance the ball ( due to inadvertant whistle) but could recover it. Also the Ole Miss reciever tried to go for it but was in the grasp of a tackler. The defensive player did the correct thing in picking up the loose ball.
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 8:33 am
Posted by aerodawg
Starkville, MS
Member since Nov 2014
79 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:28 am to
It’s the same rule that allows for a runner called down by contact to be reviewed and overturned as a fumble. There is a whistle on every one of those plays. As long as there is a clear recovery it goes to the team that recovered the ball regardless of the whistle.
Posted by skirpnasty
Atlantis
Member since Aug 2012
10781 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:28 am to
Summary and explanation of lateral events:
1. Ball thrown at 30, ball caught at 30. Lateral pass.
Opposite line judge calls it right as a fumble. Near
judge fricks up and blows it dead as incomplete.
2. Mississippi State players pick ball up
immediately
3. Refs realize they blew a live ball dead.
4. Refs frick up, and incorrectly declare it an
inadvertent whistle. An inadvertent whistle is only
when a ref accidentally blows their whistle killing
a play. That's not what happened.
5. Correctly changes it to not an inadvertent whistle.
6. Dead ball fumble goes to the team that recovers it
immediately after the play. If not picked up by
either team, than the offense retains possession.
7. MSU picked it up. Their ball. On the field call is a
fumble+recovery by msu.
8. Review has to overturn the Lateral.
9. Review confirms the Lateral.
10. MSU ball
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10822 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Players stopped including the Ole Miss player who could have recovered it.
Then he should have. Ball on the ground you fall on. Then there's no problem. BTW it was a backwards pass even kiffen said so. Not falling on the ball just to be safe is dumb whistle or not
Posted by Inadvertent Whistle
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2015
4375 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:33 am to
quote:

The Inadvertent Whistle Call Last Night


Leave me out of this!
Posted by TroyTider
Florida Panhandle
Member since Oct 2009
3764 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:34 am to
Nothing looked immediate. Good point. Fair would have been to apply possession same as a fumble out of bounds…
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:37 am to
I think they botched the call all the way around. First the early whistle (which wasn’t inadvertent, it was intentional and a bad call). Then, because there wasn’t an immediate recovery, they should not have awarded the ball to MSU. Because MSU gave it back a couple plays later, I don’t think it ultimately impacted the final result of the game.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:40 am to
quote:

then they realized the rules provided for this situation, which we have seen before. the correct call was to call it a fumble, and award the ball to the team who picked it up. it was a dead ball as soon as it was picked up.


If that’s the rule, then you coach players to always go to a loose ball even after a whistle.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:41 am to
quote:

2. Mississippi State players pick ball up immediately
This is the part that didn’t happen and why replay messed it up a second time after the officials messed it up on the field.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Inadvertent Whistle



quote:

The Inadvertent Whistle Call Last Night


Were you drunk dialing again, baw?
Posted by skirpnasty
Atlantis
Member since Aug 2012
10781 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:43 am to
quote:

If that’s the rule, then you coach players to always go to a loose ball even after a whistle.


Every coach from Jr high on does this.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30840 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Nobody knew just what in the hell was going on.



Everybody knew exactly what was going on. SEC refs were just making shite up as they went along even though what they did was clearly not what was supposed to be done. If I was Lane there is zero chance that game continues without me getting tossed.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11449 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Fumble by Ole Miss. I’m not here to cry wolf. I understand it was a backwards pass. At least it looked like it in real time.

I’m genuinely just curious because I’ve never seen anything like that before.
At the very least, it should have an incomplete pass, but initially the on-field ref said no play. If there was a whistle, it came after dude dropped the pass.
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:48 am to
Make-up call from the State-Memphis game last year.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30840 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 8:50 am to
quote:

It’s the same rule that allows for a runner called down by contact to be reviewed and overturned as a fumble. There is a whistle on every one of those plays. As long as there is a clear recovery it goes to the team that recovered the ball regardless of the whistle.


That is the spirit of the rule and when applied correctly makes sense. Last night was applied completely wrong as it was nowhere near an immediate recovery and the whistle clearly impacted the actions of the players surrounding the ball. The refs and SEC office once again disgraced themselves for all to see and once again nothing will change/happen.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter