Started By
Message
re: States where NFL players were born
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:11 pm to JohnnyRebel
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:11 pm to JohnnyRebel
Have you seen what a large % of those 6x are?
2
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:12 pm to JohnnyRebel
Because about 40% of our male population is 5’3” 160lb hispanics and there aren’t many of those guys in the league.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:12 pm to Colonel Ingus
quote:per capita, Louisiana has over twice as many as Texas according to current population sizes, which explains why A$m can’t beat LSU in their worst year of football in 2 decades.
Wow Texas blowing Louisiana out of the water in yet another statistic.
Suck at math, but great at being slumpbusters
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:13 pm to LSU2a
quote:
I’m kind of shocked that New Jersey has so many. I can’t think of any players from there nor do I remember there being that many top 100 recruits from there.
Rashaan Gary.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:13 pm to Mr Sausage
Even if half of Texas are Mexicans, you’d still be 3 time’s the size of Louisiana, yet not 3x the amount of NFL players. 
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:16 pm to Colonel Ingus
quote:
Wow Texas blowing Louisiana out of the water in yet another statistic.
It's absolutely hilarious that Aggies will talk education smack here (because everyone owns them on the field) and then spout off some low IQ shite like this.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 7:16 pm to JohnnyRebel
quote:
Even if half of Texas are Mexicans, you’d still be 3 time’s the size of Louisiana, yet not 3x the amount of NFL players.
Maybe texas players are more pampered and not as tough.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 8:39 pm to Colonel Ingus
Should be per capita, La would probably be first.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 9:24 pm to SidewalkTiger
“everyone owns”. Right up there with your tired Wake Forest bowl game smack.
Posted on 4/18/22 at 9:51 pm to Mr Sausage
quote:
“everyone owns”. Right up there with your tired Wake Forest bowl game smack.
Wake Forest owns you too.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:14 am to bruce hog
quote:
well these are meaningless less you look at percapita... in that respect louisana doing good
No it isn't and if you really wanna go there,per participant is a better metric and "since 2002" is a really strange timeline.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:28 am to RD Dawg
quote:
No it isn't and if you really wanna go there,per participant is a better metric
You always say this and someone always has to point out to you that there aren't really accurate records kept of how many kids play high school football in any given state.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:37 am to JohnnyRebel
I think Jersey surprises me most.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:38 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
You always say this
Because it's the only rational way to calculate which PARTICIPANTS in
FB actually make it to the highest level.No idea why it's so difficult for you to grasp.
I provided a link to HS FB participants in each state in our last discussion.Took some digging and I really don't have time to do it again.
Anyway,why don't you just post the current numbers for NFL players?
Why since 2002?Lots of population shifts,especially in the south since then.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:46 am to RD Dawg
I’m sure that’s the way it was figured on whatever site had the info
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:49 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Because it's the only rational way to calculate which PARTICIPANTS in
FB actually make it to the highest level.No idea why it's so difficult for you to grasp.
Everyone knows this and everyone agrees with you, there just isn't access to that information.
You're essentially telling a guy with no legs that walking is a much more efficient way to get around.
quote:
I provided a link to HS FB participants in each state in our last discussion.Took some digging and I really don't have time to do it again.
From one random year and it was like 4 years old at that point and not really verifiable.
It just isn't a measured statistic that is available consistently.
quote:
Why since 2002?Lots of population shifts,especially in the south since then.
I didn't make the graphic.
Not sure why this gets under your skin so much.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:57 am to Hback
quote:
think Jersey surprises me most.
Illinois.
Why are they so bad at sports in general?
Posted on 4/19/22 at 8:58 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Why since 2002?
Because 20 years is 2 decades. Nice round numbers.
Posted on 4/19/22 at 9:02 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Illinois.
Why are they so bad at sports in general?
Too busy ducking for cover & avoiding drive bys
This post was edited on 4/19/22 at 9:03 am
Posted on 4/19/22 at 9:03 am to JohnnyRebel
quote:
Texas has like 6 times the population of Louisiana. Why don’t they have 6 times the amount of players in the NFL?
Because mexicans are squatty and prefer kick ball
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News