Started By
Message
SI ranks college football's most talented rosters
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:39 pm
Top 25 Most-Talented Rosters (with Total Team Talent Rating in parentheses)
1. Alabama (345)
2. Ohio State (335)
3. Georgia (333)
4. Penn State (323)
5. Oregon (310)
6. Oklahoma (309)
7. Michigan (305)
8. Clemson (301)
9. Notre Dame (299)
10. Florida (297)
11. Auburn (292)
12. Tennessee (291)
13. Texas A&M (290)
14. Texas (288)
15. tie, Kentucky, Virginia Tech (285)
17. Purdue (284)
18. Indiana (283)
19. Minnesota (280)
20. tie, LSU, South Carolina (279)
22. tie, North Carolina, Washington (278)
24. tie, Mississippi State, Nebraska (275)
LINK
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 6:48 pm
42
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:41 pm to SidewalkTiger
Makes me giggle. That natty looks even better with those rankings.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:42 pm to SidewalkTiger
Don't mind us, just over here sending 2 stars and transfers to the league in the first round.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:43 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
17. Purdue (284) 18. Indiana (283) 19. Minnesota (280) 20. LSU
Im gonna have to call bullshite
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:44 pm to SidewalkTiger
lol no way in hell is that based on the last 4 years of 247. Kentucky and Purdue have better ranked guys than us? ROFL SI trying for major click bait.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:45 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
20. tie, LSU, South Carolina (279)
That doesn't seem right.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:45 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
15. tie, Kentucky, Virginia Tech (285)
17. Purdue (284)
18. Indiana (283)
19. Minnesota (280)
20. tie, LSU, S
yeah there’s just no way this is credible
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:45 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
13. Texas A&M (290)
14. Texas (288)
Now wait just a damn minute.
I was assured earlier that there was a gigantic media conspiracy that overrates every player that has chosen to play for Texas in the history of ever.
Did SI not get the check in the mail?
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:45 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
15. tie, Kentucky, Virginia Tech (285)
Stoops doing work. And I wonder if they factor Josh Allen and Wagner being 2 stars and both led the league past 2 years in the SEC with an sacks?
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:46 pm to SidewalkTiger
What a fake news post. You should be embarrassed
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:46 pm to PurpleandGeauld
Hogs not in the top 3? Yep, bullshite.
Off to take my meds
Off to take my meds
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:49 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
What a fake news post. You should be embarrassed
Don't shoot the messenger
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:50 pm to SidewalkTiger
No
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:50 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
20. tie, LSU, South Carolina (279)
Seems legit
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:52 pm to SidewalkTiger
Last 4 years LSU average class finish is 7.25
Last 4 years Fla average class finish is 11.50
LSU has finished 2nd, 7th, 15th and 5th. That is supposed to put them in 20th place somehow?
Last 4 years Fla average class finish is 11.50
LSU has finished 2nd, 7th, 15th and 5th. That is supposed to put them in 20th place somehow?
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:55 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
12. Tennessee (291)
quote:
20. tie, LSU, South Carolina (279)
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:55 pm to bigDgator
I think they are grading where the recruits show up to campus and how they are developed and whether they get drafted.
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:56 pm to SidewalkTiger
Lsu and USCe tied? WOW
Posted on 1/23/20 at 6:56 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
I think they are grading where the recruits show up to campus and how they are developed and whether they get drafted.
Well they bump up former 2 stars who were hidden gems. They are kinda conflating talented and developed players. There are lightly recruited receivers who will get 1000 yards in college and still never sniff the NFL
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 1/23/20 at 7:00 pm to WildcatMike
He is rating talent potential based on the composite star rating of the assumed roster of each team. It's a forward looking rating. The draft only comes into play when determining if a player is counted or not for the upcoming season (ie, is he still on the team or not).
That doesn't really do much to explain the results, but that's what the link says.
Eta
This is also a Michigan homer, so that probably explains why teams like Indiana, Purdue, and Minn are seemingly way higher than expected. I imagine that subjective and arbitrary boost in rating is largely concentrated in the Big 10.
That doesn't really do much to explain the results, but that's what the link says.
Eta
This is also a Michigan homer, so that probably explains why teams like Indiana, Purdue, and Minn are seemingly way higher than expected. I imagine that subjective and arbitrary boost in rating is largely concentrated in the Big 10.
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 7:04 pm
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News