
Started By
Message
re: SEC teams that have lost nattys to teams from different conferences this century.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:56 pm to Uga Alum
Posted on 10/7/26 at 2:56 pm to Uga Alum
You're either ignorant or just being obtuse. Those 2 Clemson teams had DeShaun Watson (who beat us on the last play of the game) and then Trevor Lawrence at QB and were damned good teams. But hey, they were no TCU, right?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:02 pm to Tigers Win Again
quote:
That is pretty impressive to have that many national title game appearances, and titles to go with 6 of them. It's also impressively absurd the number of total championships your school claims because they were named #1 in some defunct, obscure poll. By that logic, LSU could also claim the 1908, 1936, 1962, and 2011 National Championships but choose not to do so.
Bama has an undefeated (2 if you go wayyy back) that they don’t claim.
Also, they were screwed multiple times by sportswriters in the 60’s-70’s out of Titles:
- Notre Dame leap frogging #3 Bama when Bama had just beaten #1 and #2 lost in their respective Bowl Game, and yet ND at #5 was voted National Champions (also had an inferior record compared to Bama).
There are 2-3 more examples just like those where Northern Sportswriters put ND/Penn St/etc ahead of Bama in the final poll out of spite (especially when it came to ever letting them win 3 Natties in a row).
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:04 pm to Cover1Key
How do you claim 1941 national championship? Not trolling, but genuinely wondering?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:06 pm to Tigers Win Again
I agree, Bama needs to scrap the claim to the 1941 Title bc they lost twice in the same season.
They should drop 1941, and claim some of the undefeated seasons instead.
That 1941 two-loss team is the one that is used to propagate the myth that Bama claims so many Titles they don’t deserve.
When in fact, they should legitimately have 3 more that are indisputable.
When you are the only undefeated team then you should be voted National Champions in the “Poll-Era” imo.
They should drop 1941, and claim some of the undefeated seasons instead.
That 1941 two-loss team is the one that is used to propagate the myth that Bama claims so many Titles they don’t deserve.
When in fact, they should legitimately have 3 more that are indisputable.
When you are the only undefeated team then you should be voted National Champions in the “Poll-Era” imo.
This post was edited on 10/7/26 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:13 pm to Cover1Key
Now that explanation I get. Never had any Tide fan give a good, logical explanation for that.
I wish LSU would claim the 1908, 1936, and 1962 ones for sure, but I understand why they don't.
I wish LSU would claim the 1908, 1936, and 1962 ones for sure, but I understand why they don't.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:13 pm to Tideroller
You lost to an ACC team twice for a natty. Yikes!
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:29 pm to Tigers Win Again
quote:
How do you claim 1941 national championship? Not trolling, but genuinely wondering?
There's no Bama fan who's alive who cheers this one.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 3:33 pm to Refrigeraider
quote:
Pipe down
Is this CB radio jargon?
Like over and out?
But for meth heads?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 4:39 pm to halfadolla50
quote:The SEC is playing chess to everyone else's checkers.
I do respect the SEC's new philosophy of you can't lose to a different conference in the championship game, if you don't make the championship game.
Big Brain Stuff
Posted on 10/7/26 at 4:57 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
We haven’t lost to any ACC teams in nattys though. That’s pretty embarrassing.
Not as embarrassing as losing to Notre Dame…
Posted on 10/7/26 at 4:58 pm to Uga Alum
Texas? Or was that in the semis?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:11 pm to RTRcdub
Losing to Clemson is way worse than losing to Notre dame
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:14 pm to mwlewis
quote:
Uga Alum 10/7/26 at 1:21 pm to Bama54
Let’s do number of championships this decade.
Reply1...
411
Posted by mwlewis 10/7/26 at 2:56 pm to Uga Alum
Lets do head to head record this decade.
Hell, just jump to number of claimed nattys and be done. Surely no team in the SEC has claimed a natty that they didn't actually win.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 5:59 pm to Bama54
quote:
Now let’s do # of championships this century
You do it, sport. We ain't gonna do your work for ya.
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:26 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
Losing to Clemson is way worse than losing to Notre dame
Pretty sure losing to a program that hasn’t won shite since the Reagan administration was preparing to exit office is much worse, but whatever helps you cope…
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:26 pm to Uga Alum
Do Heisman winners this century?
Why not bring it back to the 90s and 80s? How was Georgia back then?
Why not bring it back to the 90s and 80s? How was Georgia back then?
Posted on 10/7/26 at 6:30 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
(In football)
Alabama (x2)
Auburn
Sorry if I missed anybody.
I fricking HATE Alabama, and still this is dumb as shite.
they played in the title game 9 times, and won 7....
Georgia has played in the game 3 times, and lost one.
Head to head Georgia vs Bama record is 1-1....
So, Bama has appeared in the game 3x as many times as Georgia. they've won it more than 2x as many times as Georgia.
Bama has a 78% winning percentage in the championship game.
Georgia has a 67% winning percentage in the championship game.
I fricking HATE bama, but you're dumb as shite for starting this thread.

Popular
Back to top

1








